The signatures of selection for translational accuracy in plant genes

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1117-1126

  Porceddu, Andrea ^a   Zenoni, Sara ^b   Camiolo, Salvatore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coding sequences evolution; Codon bias; Constrained sites

Indexed keywords

CODON;

CODON; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT; PLANT GENE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; ARTICLE; CODING SEQUENCES EVOLUTION; CODON BIAS; CONSTRAINED SITES;

CODON; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; PLANTS; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

CODING SEQUENCES EVOLUTION; CODON BIAS; CONSTRAINED SITES;

EID: 84891587646     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt078     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akashi H. 1994. Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136:927-935.
2. Akashi H. 1998. Translational selection and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 8:688-693.
3. Akashi H. 2003. Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. Genetics 164:1291-1303.
4. Arava Y. 2003. Isolation of polysomal RNA for microarray analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 224:79-87.
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1996. Controlling for false discovery rate: practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc. 57(1):289-300.
6. Bucciantini M, et al. 2002. Inherent toxicity of aggregates implies a common mechanism for protein misfolding diseases. Nature 416:507-511.
7. Bustamante CD, et al. 2002. The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis. Nature 416(4):531-534.
8. Carels N, Bernardi G. 2000. Two classes of genes in plants. Genetics 154:1819-1825.
9. De Castro E, et al. 2006. ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signatures matches and ProRule associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acid Res. 34(Web server issue):W362-W365.
10. De Risi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO. 1997. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278:680-686.
11. dos Reis M, Savva R, Wernisch L. 2004. Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:5036-5044.
12. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint in coding sequence evolution. Cell 134:341-352.
13. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2009. The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis. Nat Rev Genet. 10:715-724.
14. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity 5:113.
15. Goodstein DM, et al. 2012. Phytozome a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acid Res. 40:D1178-D1186.
16. Gray NK, Hentze MW. 1994. Regulation of protein synthesis by mRNA structure. Mol Biol Rep. 19:195-200.
17. Guo X, Bao J, Fan L. 2007. Evidence of selectively driven codon usage in rice: implications for GC content evolution of Graminae genes. FEBS Lett. 58:1015-1021.
18. Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman J R S. 2009. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324:218-223.
19. Jain M, et al. 2007. F-box proteins in rice. Genome-wide analysis, classification, temporal and spatial gene expression during panicle and seed development, and regulation by light and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. 143(4):1467-1483.
20. Kramer EB, Farabaugh PJ. 2007. The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition. RNA 13:87-96.
21. Lee Y, Zhou T, Tartaglia G, Vendruscolo M, Wilke C. 2010. Translationally optimal codons associate with aggregation-prone sites in proteins. Proteomics 10:4163-4171.
22. Lipman DJ, Wilbur WG. 1985. Interaction of silent and replacement changes in eukaryotic coding sequences. J Mol Evol. 21:166-167.
23. Marais G, Duret L. 2001. Synonymous codon usage, accuracy of translation and gene length in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Evol. 52(3):275-280.
24. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich E. 1999. Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. J Mol Biol. 291:177-196.
25. Moura GR, Carreto LC, Santos M. 2009. Genetic code ambiguity an unexpected source of proteome innovation and phenotypic diversity. Curr Opin Microbiol. 12:631-637.
26. Mukhopadhyay P, Basak S, Ghosh G T C. 2008. Differential selective constraints shaping codon usage pattern of housekeeping and tissue-specific homologous genes of rice and Arabidopsis. DNA Res. 15:347-356.
27. Netzer N, et al. 2009. Innate immune and chemically triggered oxidative stress modifies translational fidelity. Nature 462:522-526.
28. Niimura Y, Terabe M, Gojobori T, Miura K. 2003. Comparative analyses at the gene terminal portions in seven eukaryotes genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:5195-5201.
29. Ostlund G, et al. 2010. InParanoid 7:new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D196-D203.
30. Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. 2006. An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 7:337-348.
31. Parker J. 1989. Errors and alternatives in reading the universal genetic code. Microbiol Rev. 53:273-298.
32. Percudani R. 1999. Selection at the wobble position of codons read by the same tRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Evol. 16:1752-1762.
33. Porceddu A, Camiolo S. 2011. Spatial analyses of mono, di and trinucleotide trends in plant genes. PLoS One 6:e22855.
34. Qin H, Wu WB, Comeron JM, Kreitman M, Li WH. 2004. Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Genetics 168:2245-2260.
35. Schmid M, et al. 2005. A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nat Genet. 37:501-506.
36. Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. 2003. Conserved residue clustering and protein structure prediction. Proteins 52:225-235.
37. Servant F, et al. 2002. ProDom: automated clustering of homologous domains. Brief Bioinform. 3:246-251.
38. Sharp PM. 1987. The Codon Adaptation Index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1281-1295.
39. Slotte T, Foxe J P M, Hazzouri JM, Wright S. 2010. Genome-wide evidence for efficient positive and purifying selection in Capsella grandiflora, a plant species with a large effective population size. Mol Biol Evol. 27(8):1813-1821.
40. Stoletzki N, Eyre Walker A. 2007. Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli. Selection for translational accuracy. Mol Biol Evol. 24(2):374-381.
41. Tuller T, et al. 2010. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell 141:344-354.
42. Tuller T, et al. 2011. Composite effects of gene determinants on the translation speed and density of ribosomes. Genome Biol. 12:R110.
43. Wong G K S, et al. 2002. Compositional gradients in graminae genes. Genome Res. 12:851-856.
44. Wright SI, Yau C B K, Looseley M, Meyers B. 2004. Effects of gene expression on molecular evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1719-1726.
45. Zhou T, Mason W, Wilke CO. 2009. Translationally optimal codons associate with structurally sensitive sites in proteins. Mol Biol Evol. 26:1571-1580.