메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 154, Issue , 2015, Pages 69-76

Highly reflective reasoners show no signs of belief inhibition

Author keywords

Belief inhibition; Conflict; Dual process theory; Logic; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COGNITION; CONFLICT; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LOGIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; THINKING;

EID: 84916623127     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.008     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (17)

References (30)
  • 1
    • 84950353274 scopus 로고
    • A 3-min reasoning test based on grammatical transformation
    • Baddeley A.D. A 3-min reasoning test based on grammatical transformation. Psychonomic Science 1968, 10:341-342. 10.3758/BF03331551.
    • (1968) Psychonomic Science , vol.10 , pp. 341-342
    • Baddeley, A.D.1
  • 2
    • 77953932430 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making
    • Bonner C., Newell B.R. In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:186-196. 10.3758/MC.38.2.186.
    • (2010) Memory & Cognition , vol.38 , pp. 186-196
    • Bonner, C.1    Newell, B.R.2
  • 3
    • 33646228837 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dual processing in reasoning. Two systems but one reasoner
    • De Neys W. Dual processing in reasoning. Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science 2006, 17:428-433. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01723.x.
    • (2006) Psychological Science , vol.17 , pp. 428-433
    • De Neys, W.1
  • 4
    • 84855408026 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions
    • De Neys W. Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7:28-38. 10.1177/1745691611429354.
    • (2012) Perspectives on Psychological Science , vol.7 , pp. 28-38
    • De Neys, W.1
  • 5
    • 84894298183 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications
    • De Neys W. Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications. Thinking and Reasoning 2014, 20:169-187. 10.1080/1354678.2013.854725.
    • (2014) Thinking and Reasoning , vol.20 , pp. 169-187
    • De Neys, W.1
  • 6
    • 84875812626 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The 'whys' and 'whens' of individual differences in thinking biases
    • De Neys W., Bonnefon J.-F. The 'whys' and 'whens' of individual differences in thinking biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17:172-178. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001.
    • (2013) Trends in Cognitive Sciences , vol.17 , pp. 172-178
    • De Neys, W.1    Bonnefon, J.-F.2
  • 7
    • 70349762441 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Belief inhibition during thinking: Not always winning but at least taking part
    • De Neys W., Franssens S. Belief inhibition during thinking: Not always winning but at least taking part. Cognition 2009, 113:45-61. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.009.
    • (2009) Cognition , vol.113 , pp. 45-61
    • De Neys, W.1    Franssens, S.2
  • 8
    • 38649121155 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking
    • De Neys W., Glumicic T. Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition 2008, 106:1248-1299. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002.
    • (2008) Cognition , vol.106 , pp. 1248-1299
    • De Neys, W.1    Glumicic, T.2
  • 9
    • 0028438275 scopus 로고
    • Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment
    • Denes-Raj V., Epstein S. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66:819-829. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.819.
    • (1994) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , vol.66 , pp. 819-829
    • Denes-Raj, V.1    Epstein, S.2
  • 10
    • 70449368659 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many?
    • Oxford University Press, Oxford & NY, J. Evans, K. Frankish (Eds.)
    • Evans J.St.B.T. How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many?. In Two Minds. Dual Processes and Beyond 2009, 33-54. Oxford University Press, Oxford & NY. J. Evans, K. Frankish (Eds.).
    • (2009) In Two Minds. Dual Processes and Beyond , pp. 33-54
    • Evans, J.1
  • 11
    • 41549146748 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition
    • Evans J.St.B.T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:255-278. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
    • (2008) Annual Review of Psychology , vol.59 , pp. 255-278
    • Evans, J.1
  • 12
    • 0020757857 scopus 로고
    • On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning
    • Evans J.St.B.T., Barston J., Pollard P. On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory and Cognition 1983, 11:295-306. 10.3758/BF03196976.
    • (1983) Memory and Cognition , vol.11 , pp. 295-306
    • Evans, J.1    Barston, J.2    Pollard, P.3
  • 13
    • 33744967334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning
    • Evans J.St.B.T., Curtis-Holmes J. Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 2005, 11:382-389. 10.1080/13546780542000005.
    • (2005) Thinking and Reasoning , vol.11 , pp. 382-389
    • Evans, J.1    Curtis-Holmes, J.2
  • 14
    • 33645810587 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cognitive reflection and decision making
    • Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2005, 19:25-42.
    • (2005) Journal of Economic Perspectives , vol.19 , pp. 25-42
    • Frederick, S.1
  • 16
    • 58149207085 scopus 로고
    • Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!
    • Kyllonen P.C., Christal R.E. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!. Intelligence 1990, 14:389-433. 10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1.
    • (1990) Intelligence , vol.14 , pp. 389-433
    • Kyllonen, P.C.1    Christal, R.E.2
  • 18
    • 77955958079 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conditional reasoning under time constraint: Information retrieval and inhibition
    • Lortie Forgues H., Markovits H. Conditional reasoning under time constraint: Information retrieval and inhibition. Thinking and Reasoning 2010, 16:221-232. 10.1080/13546783.2010.503606.
    • (2010) Thinking and Reasoning , vol.16 , pp. 221-232
    • Lortie Forgues, H.1    Markovits, H.2
  • 19
    • 34447120840 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and instructional set as predictors of critical thinking
    • Macpherson R., Stanovich K.E. Cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and instructional set as predictors of critical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences 2007, 17:115-127. 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.05.003.
    • (2007) Learning and Individual Differences , vol.17 , pp. 115-127
    • Macpherson, R.1    Stanovich, K.E.2
  • 20
    • 33645016441 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Syllogistic reasoning and belief-bias inhibition in school children: Evidence from a negative priming paradigm
    • Moutier S., Plagne-Cayeux S., Melot A.-M., Houdé O. Syllogistic reasoning and belief-bias inhibition in school children: Evidence from a negative priming paradigm. Developmental Science 2006, 9:166-172. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00476.x.
    • (2006) Developmental Science , vol.9 , pp. 166-172
    • Moutier, S.1    Plagne-Cayeux, S.2    Melot, A.-M.3    Houdé, O.4
  • 24
    • 68949185887 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory?
    • Oxford University Press, Oxford & NY, J. Evans, K. Frankish (Eds.)
    • Stanovich K.E. Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory?. In Two Minds. Dual Processes and Beyond 2009, 55-88. Oxford University Press, Oxford & NY. J. Evans, K. Frankish (Eds.).
    • (2009) In Two Minds. Dual Processes and Beyond , pp. 55-88
    • Stanovich, K.E.1
  • 25
    • 0034488449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
    • Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:645-665.
    • (2000) Behavioral and Brain Sciences , vol.23 , pp. 645-665
    • Stanovich, K.E.1    West, R.F.2
  • 27
    • 84862334714 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Belief bias in informal reasoning
    • Thompson V.A., Evans J.St.B.T. Belief bias in informal reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 2012, 18:278-310. 10.1080/13546783.2012.670752.
    • (2012) Thinking and Reasoning , vol.18 , pp. 278-310
    • Thompson, V.A.1    Evans, J.2
  • 29
    • 84856413981 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
    • Toplak M., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition 2011, 39:1275-1289. 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1.
    • (2011) Memory & Cognition , vol.39 , pp. 1275-1289
    • Toplak, M.1    West, R.F.2    Stanovich, K.E.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.