NEXUS: An extensible file format for systematic information

Systematic Biology

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 590-617

  Maddison, David R ^a   Swofford, David L ^b   Maddison, Wayne P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

^c University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer program; File format; NEXUS; Systematics

Indexed keywords

DNA; RNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, GENETIC; DNA; PHYLOGENY; RNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0031350056     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2413497     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE. 1986. 7-Bit American Standard Code for Information Interchange, Standard ANSI X3.4-1986. American National Standards Institute, New York.
2. BANDELT, H.-J., AND A. W. M. DRESS. 1992. Split decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:242-252.
3. DONOGHUE, M. J., T. ERIKSSON, W. PIEL, K. RICE, AND M. SANDERSON. 1996. TreeBASE. A database of phylogenetic knowledge. World Wide Web: http:// herbaria.harvard.edu/treebase/
4. FARRIS, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19:83-92.
5. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1993. PHYLIP: Phylogeny inference package, version 3.5c. Distributed by the author, Department of Genetics, Univ. Washington, Seattle.
6. FISHER, D. C. 1992. Stratigraphic parsimony. Pages 124-129 in MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution (W. P. Maddison and D. R. Maddison, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
7. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimal change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20:406-116.
8. HARTIGAN, J. A. 1973. Minimum mutation fits to a given tree. Biometrics 29:53-65.
9. HUSON, D. H., AND R. WETZEL. 1994. SplitsTree, version 1.01. Distributed by the authors, Univ. Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
10. LEWIS, P. O., AND D. ZAYKIN. 1996. Genetic Data Analysis: Software for the analysis of discrete genetic data. World Wide Web: http://biology.unm.edu/ ~lewisp/gda.html
11. MADDISON, W. P:, AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
12. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1997. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.07. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
13. OSAWA, S., T. H. JUKES, K. WATANABE, AND A. MUTO. 1992. Recent evidence for the evolution of the genetic code. Microbiol. Rev. 56:229-264.
14. PAGE, R. D. M. 1993. COMPONENT, version 2.0. The Natural History Museum, London.
15. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1989. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.0. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
16. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
17. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND W. P. MADDISON. 1987. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Math. Biosci. 87:199-229.
18. WETZEL, R. 1994. The split decomposition algorithm. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.