Machine learning for Big Data analytics in plants

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 798-808

  Ma, Chuang ^a,d   Zhang, Hao Helen ^b   Wang, Xiangfeng ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b The University of Arizona   (United States)

^c CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Big Data; Large scale datasets; Machine learning; Plants

Indexed keywords

EID: 84915785146     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.08.004     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Principles of Big Data: Preparing, Sharing, and Analyzing Complex Information 2013, Elsevier, Morgan Kaufmann. J.J. Berman (Ed.).
2. Marx V. Biology: the big challenges of big data. Nature 2013, 498:255-260.
3. Brauer E.K., et al. Next-generation plant science: putting big data to work. Genome Bio. 2014, 15:301.
4. Schatz M.C. Computational thinking in the era of big data biology. Genome Bio. 2012, 13:177.
5. Schumacher A., et al. SeqPig: simple and scalable scripting for large sequencing data sets in Hadoop. Bioinformatics 2014, 30:119-120.
6. Nordberg H., et al. BioPig: a Hadoop-based analytic toolkit for large-scale sequence data. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:3014-3019.
7. Langmead B., et al. Searching for SNPs with cloud computing. Genome Bio. 2009, 10:R134.
8. Niemenmaa M., et al. Hadoop-BAM: directly manipulating next generation sequencing data in the cloud. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:876-877.
9. Zou Q., et al. Survey of MapReduce frame operation in bioinformatics. Brief. Bioinform. 2013, 10.1093/bib/bbs088.
10. Statistical and Machine-learning Data Mining: Techniques for Better Predictive Modeling and Analysis of Big Data 2011, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. 2nd edn. B. Ratner (Ed.).
11. Bassel G.W., et al. Systems analysis of plant functional, transcriptional, physical interaction, and metabolic networks. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3859-3875.
12. Bassel G.W., et al. Functional network construction in Arabidopsis using rule-based machine learning on large-scale data sets. Plant Cell 2011, 23:3101-3116.
13. Roy S., et al. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 2010, 330:1787-1797.
14. Bernstein B.E., et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012, 489:57-74.
15. Marbach D., et al. Predictive regulatory models in Drosophila melanogaster by integrative inference of transcriptional networks. Genome Res. 2012, 22:1334-1349.
16. Ma C., et al. Machine learning-based differential network analysis: a study of stress-responsive transcriptiomes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26:520-537.
17. Van Landeghem S., et al. The potential of text mining in data integration and network biology for plant research: a case study on Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25:794-807.
18. Goff S.A., et al. The iPlant collaborative: cyber infrastructure for plant biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2:34.
19. Mjolsness E., DeCoste D. Machine learning for science: state of the art and future prospects. Science 2001, 293:2051-2055.
20. Larranaga P., et al. Machine learning in bioinformatics. Brief. Bioinform. 2006, 7:86-112.
21. Tarca A.L., et al. Machine learning and its applications to biology. PLoS Comput. Bio. 2007, 3:e116.
22. Zhao N., et al. Determining effects of non-synonymous SNPs on protein-protein interactions using supervised and semi-supervised learning. PLoS Comput. Bio. 2014, 10:e1003592.
23. Bordes A., et al. Fast kernel classifiers with online and active learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005, 6:1579-1619.
24. Evaluating Learning Algorithms: A Classification Perspective 2011, Cambridge University Press. N. Japkowicz, M. Shah (Eds.).
25. Pattern Recognition: A Statistical Approach 1982, Prentice Hall. P.A. Devijver, J. Kittler (Eds.).
26. Hall P., et al. Geometric representation of high dimension, low sample size data. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 2005, 67:427-444.
27. Saeys Y., et al. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2507-2517.
28. Taguchi Y.H., Murakami Y. Principal component analysis based feature extraction approach to identify circulating microRNA biomarkers. PloS ONE 2013, 8:e66714.
29. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag. 1901, 2:559-572.
30. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data 2002, John Wiley and Sons. 2nd edn. R.A. Little, D.B. Rubin (Eds.).
31. Liew A.W., et al. Missing value imputation for gene expression data: computational techniques to recover missing data from available information. Brief. Bioinform. 2011, 12:498-513.
32. Aittokallio T. Dealing with missing values in large-scale studies: microarray data imputation and beyond. Brief. Bioinform. 2010, 11:253-264.
33. Haukoos J.S., Newgard C.D. Advanced statistics: missing data in clinical research - part 1: an introduction and conceptual framework. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2007, 14:662-668.
34. Aniba M.R., et al. Issues in bioinformatics benchmarking: the case study of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:7353-7363.
35. Abeel T., et al. Toward a gold standard for promoter prediction evaluation. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:i313-i320.
36. Martin J. Benchmarking protein-protein interface predictions: why you should care about protein size. Proteins 2014, 82:1444-1452.
37. Hwang H., et al. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010, 78:3111-3114.
38. Linn M.C. The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences 2006, 243-264. Cambridge University Press. R.K. Sawyer (Ed.).
39. Blagus R., Lusa L. Class prediction for high-dimensional class-imbalanced data. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:523.
40. Zhao X.M., et al. Protein classification with imbalanced data. Proteins 2008, 70:1125-1132.
41. Gudys A., et al. HuntMi: an efficient and taxon-specific approach in pre-miRNA identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14:83.
42. Chawla N.V., et al. Editorial: special issue on learning from imbalanced data sets. SIGKDD Explorations 2004, 1-6.
43. Zang Q., et al. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53:3244-3261.
44. Furey T.S., et al. Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:906-914.
45. Zheng W., et al. An ensemble method for prediction of conformational B-cell epitopes from antigen sequences. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2014, 49:51-58.
46. He H., Garcia E.A. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. 2009, 1263-1284.
47. Yousef M., et al. Learning from positive examples when the negative class is undetermined - microRNA gene identification. Algorithms Mol. Bio. 2008, 3:2.
48. Evaluation Learning Algorithm: A Classification Perspective 2011, Cambridge University Press. N. Japkowicz, M. Shah (Eds.).
49. Lertampaiporn S., et al. Heterogeneous ensemble approach with discriminative features and modified-SMOTEbagging for pre-miRNA classification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:e21.
50. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 2006, 27:861-874.
51. Zou C., et al. Cis-regulatory code of stress-responsive transcription in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:14992-14997.
52. Kelchtermans P., et al. Machine learning applications in proteomics research: how the past can boost the future. Proteomics 2014, 14:353-366.
53. Wessels L.F., et al. A protocol for building and evaluating predictors of disease state based on microarray data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3755-3762.
54. Ruffalo M., et al. Accurate estimation of short read mapping quality for next-generation genome sequencing. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:i349-i355.
55. Yip K.Y., et al. Machine learning and genome annotation: a match meant to be?. Genome Bio. 2013, 14:205.
56. DePristo M.A., et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:491-498.
57. Yandell M., Ence D. A beginner's guide to eukaryotic genome annotation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:329-342.
58. Leclercq M., et al. Computational prediction of the localization of microRNAs within their pre-miRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:7200-7211.
59. Sherwood R.I., et al. Discovery of directional and nondirectional pioneer transcription factors by modeling DNase profile magnitude and shape. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:171-178.
60. St Laurent G., et al. Genome-wide analysis of A-to-I RNA editing by single-molecule sequencing in Drosophila. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:1333-1339.
61. Shlyueva D., et al. Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15:272-286.
62. Choi J.H., et al. A machine-learning approach to combined evidence validation of genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:744-750.
63. Palmer L.E., et al. Improving de novo sequence assembly using machine learning and comparative genomics for overlap correction. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:33.
64. Li Y., et al. TrueSight: a new algorithm for splice junction detection using RNA-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:e51.
65. Brenchley R., et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 2012, 491:705-710.
66. Middleton A.M., et al. Modeling regulatory networks to understand plant development: small is beautiful. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3876-3891.
67. Arvey A., et al. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding. Genome Res. 2012, 22:1723-1734.
68. Gitter A., et al. Linking the signaling cascades and dynamic regulatory networks controlling stress responses. Genome Res. 2013, 23:365-376.
69. Petrey D., Honig B. Structural bioinformatics of the interactome. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2014, 43:193-210.
70. Marbach D., et al. Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:796-804.
71. Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Network Analysis 2012, John Wiley and Sons. M. Dehmer, S.C. Basak (Eds.).
72. Lee W.P., Tzou W.S. Computational methods for discovering gene networks from gene data. Brief. Bioinform. 2009, 10:408-423.
73. Lamesch P., et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D1202-D1210.
74. Rhee S.Y., Mutwil M. Towards revealing the functions of all genes in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:212-221.
75. Radivojac P., et al. A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:221-227.
76. Yachdav G., et al. PredictProtein - an open resource for online prediction of protein structural and functional features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:W337-W343.
77. Wang Z., Xu J. Predicting protein contact map using evolutionary and physical constraints by integer programming. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:i266-i273.
78. Faraggi E., Kloczkowski A. A global machine learning based scoring function for protein structure prediction. Proteins 2014, 82:752-759.
79. Bradford J.R., et al. GO-At: in silico prediction of gene function in Arabidopsis thaliana by combining heterogeneous data. Plant J. 2010, 61:713-721.
80. Kaundal R., et al. Combining machine learning and homology-based approaches to accurately predict subcellular localization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:36-54.
81. Reumann S., et al. PredPlantPTS1: a web server for the prediction of plant peroxisomal proteins. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3:194.
82. Lingner T., et al. Identification of novel plant peroxisomal targeting signals by a combination of machine learning methods and in vivo subcellular targeting analyses. Plant Cell 2011, 23:1556-1572.
83. Agrawal G.K., et al. Plant secretome: unlocking secrets of the secreted proteins. Proteomics 2010, 10:799-827.
84. Park Y., Marcotte E.M. Revisiting the negative example sampling problem for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:3024-3028.
85. Ornella L., et al. Genomic-enable prediction with classification algorithm. Heredity 2014, 112:616-626.
86. Ehret D.L., et al. Neural network modeling of greenhouse tomato yield, growth and water use from automated crop monitoring data. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2011, 79:82-89.
87. Verma R., Melcher U. A support vector machine based method to distinguish proteobacterial proteins from eukaryotic plant proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13:S9.
88. Moore J.H., et al. Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:445-455.
89. Eliceiri K.W., et al. Biological imaging software tools. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:697-710.