Protein structure quality assessment based on the distance profiles of consecutive backbone Cα atoms

F1000Research

Volumn 2, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Chakraborty, Sandeep ^a   Venkatramani, Ravindra ^a   Rao, Basuthkar J ^a   Asgeirsson, Bjarni ^b   Dandekar, Abhaya M ^c  

^a TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; PREDICTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84914814539     PISSN: 20461402     EISSN: 1759796X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.2-211.v3     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Wise EL Rayment I: Understanding the importance of protein structure to nature's routes for divergent evolution in TIM barrel enzymes. Acc Chem Res. 2004;37(3):149-158. 15023082 10.1021/ar030250v
2. Soding J: Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(7):951-960. 15531603 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125
3. Peng J Xu J: RaptorX: exploiting structure information for protein alignment by statistical inference. Proteins. 2011;79(Suppl 10):161-171. 21987485 10.1002/prot.23175 3226909
4. Zhang Y: Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins. 2007;69(Suppl 8):108-117. 17894355 10.1002/prot.21702
5. Wu S Skolnick J Zhang Y: Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biol. 2007;5:17. 17488521 10.1186/1741-7007-5-17 1878469
6. Rohl CA Strauss CE Misura KM: Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 2004;383:66-93. 15063647 10.1016/S0076-6879(04)83004-0
7. Chen J Brooks CL: Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins. 2007;67(4):922-930. 17373704 10.1002/prot.21345
8. Zhu J Fan H Periole X: Refining homology models by combining replica- exchange molecular dynamics and statistical potentials. Proteins. 2008;72(4):1171-1188. 18338384 10.1002/prot.22005 2761145
9. Raval A Piana S Eastwood MP: Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins. 2012;80(8):2071-2079. 22513870 10.1002/prot.24098
10. Lee MR Tsai J Baker D: Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol. 2001;313(2):417-430. 11800566 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5032
11. Ginalski K Elofsson A Fischer D: 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(8):1015-1018. 12761065 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg124
12. Terashi G Oosawa M Nakamura Y: United3D: a protein model quality assessment program that uses two consensus based methods. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2012;60(11):1359-1365. 23124558 10.1248/cpb.c12-00287
13. Wallner B Elofsson A: Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins. 2007;69(Suppl 8):184-193. 17894353 10.1002/prot.21774
14. Adamczak R Pillardy J Vallat BK: Fast geometric consensus approach for protein model quality assessment. J Comput Biol. 2011;18(12):1807-1818. 21244273 10.1089/cmb.2010.0170
15. McGuffin LJ: Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:345. 17877795 10.1186/1471-2105-8-345 2048972
16. Tanaka S Scheraga HA: Model of protein folding: inclusion of short-, medium-, and long-range interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975;72(10):3802-3806. 1060065 10.1073/pnas.72.10.3802 433083
17. Miyazawa S Jernigan RL: Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules. 1985;18(3):534-552. 10.1021/ma00145a039
18. Sippl MJ: Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1990;213(4):859-883. 2359125 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80269-4
19. Sippl MJ: Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1995;5(2):229-235. 7648326 10.1016/0959-440X(95)80081-6
20. Zhou H Zhou Y: Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 2002;11(11):2714-2726. 12381853 10.1110/ps.0217002 2373736
21. Thomas PD Dill KA: Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol. 1996;257(2):457-469. 8609636 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0175
22. Hamelryck T Borg M Paluszewski M: Potentials of mean force for protein structure prediction vindicated, formalized and generalized. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11):e13714. 21103041 10.1371/journal.pone.0013714 2978081
23. Samudrala R Moult J: An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol. 1998;275(5):895-916. 9480776 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1479
24. Shen MY Sali A: Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 2006;15(11):2507-2524. 17075131 10.1110/ps.062416606 2242414
25. Rajgaria R McAllister SR Floudas CA: A novel high resolution Calpha-Calpha distance dependent force field based on a high quality decoy set. Proteins. 2006;65(3):726-741. 16981202 10.1002/prot.21149
26. Lu H Skolnick J: A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins. 2001;44(3):223-232. 11455595 10.1002/prot.1087
27. Word JM Lovell SC LaBean TH: Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. J Mol Biol. 1999;285(4):1711-1733. 9917407 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2400
28. Samudrala R Levitt M: Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci. 2000;9(7):1399-1401. 10933507 10.1110/ps.9.7.1399 2144680
29. Engh RA Huber R: Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallographica Section A. 1991;47:392-400. 10.1107/S0108767391001071
30. Chen VB Arendall WB Headd JJ: MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 1):12-21. 20057044 10.1107/S0907444909042073 2803126
31. Wiederstein M Sippl MJ: ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W407-410. 17517781 10.1093/nar/gkm290 1933241
32. Vriend G: WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graph. 1990;8(1):52-56. 2268628 10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-V
33. Richardson J Richardson D: The zen of model anomalies - correct most of them. Treasure the meaningful valid few. Live serenely with the rest! Advancing Methods for Biomolecular Crystallography, Springer Netherlands.2013;1-10. 10.1007/978-94-007-6232-9_1
34. Hennig M Jansonius JN Terwisscha van Scheltinga AC: Crystal structure of concanavalin B at 1.65 A resolution. An "inactivated" chitinase from seeds of Canavalia ensiformis. J Mol Biol. 1995;254(2):237-246. 7490746 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0614
35. Wilson DK Bohren KM Gabbay KH: An unlikely sugar substrate site in the 1.65 A structure of the human aldose reductase holoenzyme implicated in diabetic complications. Science. 1992;257(5066):81-84. 1621098 10.1126/science.1621098
36. Zhang Y: I-TASSER: fully automated protein structure prediction in CASP8. Proteins. 2009;77(Suppl 9):100-13. 19768687 10.1002/prot.22588 2782770
37. Wang G Dunbrack RL Jr: PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(12):1589-91. 12912846 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224
38. Kryshtafovych A Monastyrskyy B Fidelis K: Casp prediction center infrastructure and evaluation measures in casp10 and casp roll. Proteins. 2013. 24038551 10.1002/prot.24399
39. Lovell SC Davis IW Arendall WB: Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi, psi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins. 2003;50(3):437-450. 12557186 10.1002/prot.10286
40. Chakraborty S Minda R Salaye L: Active site detection by spatial conformity and electrostatic analysis-unravelling a proteolytic function in shrimp alkaline phosphatase. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e28470. 22174814 10.1371/journal.pone.0028470 3234256
41. Rendon-Ramirez A Shukla M Oda M: A Computational Module Assembled from Different Protease Family Motifs Identifies PI PLC from Bacillus cereus as a Putative Prolyl Peptidase with a Serine Protease Scaffold. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70923. 23940667 10.1371/journal.pone.0070923 3733634
42. Helland R Larsen RL Asgeirsson B: The 1.4 Å crystal structure of the large and cold-active Vibrio. sp. alkaline phosphatase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1794(2):297-308. 18977465 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.09.020
43. Chakraborty S Asgeirsson B Minda R: Inhibition of a cold-active alkaline phosphatase by imipenem revealed by in silico modeling of metallo- β-lactamase active sites. FEBS Lett. 2012;586(20):3710-3715. 22982109 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.08.030
44. Honig B Nicholls A: Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science. 1995;268(5214):1144-1149. 7761829 10.1126/science.7761829
45. Bashford D Karplus M: pKa's of ionizable groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model. Biochemistry. 1990;29(44):10219-10225. 2271649 10.1021/bi00496a010
46. Baker NA Sept D Joseph S: Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(18):10037-10041. 11517324 10.1073/pnas.181342398 56910
47. Chakraborty S Rao BJ: A measure of the promiscuity of proteins and characteristics of residues in the vicinity of the catalytic site that regulate promiscuity. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32011. 22359655 10.1371/journal.pone.0032011 3281107
48. Shen MY Sali A: Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 2006;15(11):2507-2524. 17075131 10.1110/ps.062416606 2242414
49. Kryshtafovych A Fidelis K Tramontano A: Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9. Proteins. 2011;79(Suppl 10):91-106. 21997462 10.1002/prot.23180 3226935
50. Benkert P Tosatto SC Schomburg D: QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins. 2008;71(1):261-277. 17932912 10.1002/prot.21715
51. Tosatto SC: The victor/FRST function for model quality estimation. J Comput Biol. 2005;12(10):1316-1327. 16379537 10.1089/cmb.2005.12.1316
52. Bagaria A Jaravine V Huang YJ: Protein structure validation by generalized linear model root-mean-square deviation prediction. Protein Sci. 2012;21(2):229-238. 22113924 10.1002/pro.2007 3324767
53. Zhou J Yan W Hu G: Svr caf: An integrated score function for detecting native protein structures among decoys. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2013; In press. 24115148 10.1002/prot.24421
54. Moult J: A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005;15(3):285-289. 15939584 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.05.011
55. Kryshtafovych A Barbato A Fidelis K: Assessment of the assessment: Evaluation of the model quality estimates in CASP10. Proteins. 2013. 23780644 10.1002/prot.24347
56. Benkert P Biasini M Schwede T: Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(3):343-350. 21134891 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq662 3031035
57. Handl J Knowles J Lovell SC: Artefacts and biases affecting the evaluation of scoring functions on decoy sets for protein structure prediction. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(10):1271-1279. 19297350 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp150 2677743
58. Chakraborty S Rao BJ Asgeirsson B: The electrostatic profile of consecutive cβ atoms applied to protein structure quality assessment. F1000Research. 2013;2: 243. 10.12688/f1000research.2-243.v2
59. Konagurthu AS Whisstock JC Stuckey PJ: MUSTANG: a multiple structural alignment algorithm. Proteins. 2006;64(3):559-574. 16736488 10.1002/prot.20921