A novel high resolution Cα-Cα distance dependent force field based on a high quality decoy set

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 726-741

  Rajgaria, R ^a   McAllister, S R ^a   Floudas, C A ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

Force field; High resolution decoys; Linear optimization; Potential model; Protein design potential; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CARBON; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ATOM; FORCE FIELD; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUANTUM MECHANICS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; CARBON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; HYDROPHOBICITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 33750050261     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21149     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181.
2. MacKerell AD, Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Jr, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Mich-Nick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, III, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
3. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Jr, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
4. Momany FA, McGuire RF, Burgess AW, Scheraga HA. Energy parameters in polypeptides. VII. Geometric parameters, partial atomic charges, nonbonded interactions, hydrogen bond interactions, and intrinsic torsional potentials for the naturally occurring amino acids. J Phys Chem 1975;79:2361-2381.
5. Némethy G, Gibson KD, Palmer KA, Yoon CN, Paterlini G, Zagari A, Rumsey S, Scheraga HA. Energy parameters in polypeptides. X. Improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides. J Phys Chem 1992;96:6472-6484.
6. Scott WRP, Hunenberger PH, Trioni IG, Mark AE, Billeter SR, Fennen J, Torda AE, Huber T, Kruger P, VanGunsteren WF. The GROMOS biomolecular simulation program package. J Phys Chem A 1997;103:3596-3607.
7. Novotny J, Rashin AA, Bruccoleri RE. Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 1984;177:788-818.
8. Wang Y, Zhang H, Li W, Scott RA. Discriminating compact non-native structures from the native structures of globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:709-713.
9. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Giffiland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
10. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:945-950.
11. Finkelstein AV, Badretdinov AY, Gutin AM. Why do proteins architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 1995;23:142-150.
12. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. The frequency of ion-pair substructures in proteins is quantitaively related to electrostatic potential: a statistical model for nonbonded interactions. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 1991;9:108-119.
13. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
14. Liwo A, Oldziej S, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Scheraga HA. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein structure simulations. I. Functional forms and parameters of long-range side-chain interaction potentials from protein crystal data. J Comput Chem 1997;18:849-873.
15. Liwo A, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Oldziej S, Scheraga HA. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein structure simulations. II. Parameterization of short-range interactions and determination of weights of energy terms by z-score optimization. J Comput Chem 1997;18:874-887.
16. Liwo A, Kazmierkiewicz R, Czaplewski C, Groth M, Oldziej S, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Pincus MR, Scheraga HA. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein structure simulations. III. Origin of backbone hydrogen bonding cooperativity in united residue potential J Comput Chem 1998;19:259-276.
17. Liwo A, Odziej S, Czaplewski C, Kozlowska U, Scheraga HA. Parametrization of backbone-electrostatic and multibody contributions to the UNRES force field for protein-structure prediction from ab initio energy surfaces of model systems. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:9421-9438.
18. Lu H, Skolnick J. A distance-dependent knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 2001;44:223-232.
19. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
20. Subramaniam S, Tcheng DK, Fenton J. A knowledge-based method for protein structure refinement and prediction. In: States D, Agarwal P, Gaasterland T, Hunter L, Smith R, editors. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology. Boston, MA: AAAI Press; 1996. pp 218-229.
21. DeBolt S, Skolnick J. Evaluation of atomic level mean force potentials via inverse folding and inverse refinement of proteins structures: atomic burial position and pairwise non-bonded interactions. Protein Eng 1996;9:637-655.
22. Loose C, Klepeis JL, Floudas CA. A new pairwise folding potential based on improved decoy generation and side-chain packing. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 2004;54:303-314.
23. Tobi D, Elber R. Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: results from linear optimization. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 2000;41:40-46.
24. Hinds DA, Levitt M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol 1994;243:668-682.
25. Floudas CA, Fung HK, McAllister SR, Mönnigmann M, Rajgaria R. Advances in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design: a review. Chem Eng Sci 2006;61:966-988.
26. Venclovas Č, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Assessment of progress over the CASP experiments. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 2003;53:585-595.
27. Misura KMS, Morozov AV, Baker D. Analysis of anisotropic side-chain packing in proteins and application to high-resolution structure prediction. J Mol Biol 2004;342:651-664.
28. Bradley P, Misura KMS, Baker D. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 2005;309:1868-1871.
29. Tobi D, Shafran G, Linial N, Elber R. On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 2000;40:71-85.
30. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Inter-residue potential in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophillic interactions at close separation. J Mol Biol 1997;266:195-214.
31. ILOG CPLEX User's Manual 9.0; 2003.
32. Dash Optimization. Xpress-MP: Getting Started; 2003.
33. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:7594-7599.
34. Güntert P, Mumenthaler C, Wüthrich K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 1997;273:283-298.
35. Meller J, Wagner M, Elber R. Maximum feasibility guideline in the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. J Comput Chem 2002;23:111-118.
36. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996; 258:367.
37. Loose C, Klepeis JL, Floudas CA. A new pairwise folding potential based on improved decoy generation and side-chain packing. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinformatics 2004;54:303-314.