Landscape structure and genetic architecture jointly impact rates of niche evolution

Ecography

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1218-1229

  Schiffers, Katja ^a,b   Schurr, Frank M ^d,e   Travis, Justin M J ^f   Duputié, Anne ^g   Eckhart, Vincent M ^h   Lavergne, Sébastien ^a,b   Mcinerny, Greg ^i,j   Moore, Kara A ^k   Pearman, Peter B ^c   Thuiller, Wilfried ^a,b   Wüest, Rafael O ^a,b,c   Holt, Robert D ^l  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^d INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^g Univ Lille   (France)

^h GRINNELL COLLEGE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^j MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84913616465     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00768     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aguilée R. et al. 2013. How does pollen versus seed dispersal affect niche evolution?- Evolution 67: 792-805.
2. Alleaume-Benharira M. et al. 2006. Geographical patterns of adaptation within a species' range: interactions between drift and gene flow. - J. Evol. Biol. 19: 203-215.
3. Angert A. L. et al. 2008. Using experimental evolution to investigate geographic range limits in monkeyflowers. - Evolution 62: 2660-2675.
4. Atkins K. E. and Travis J. M. J. 2010. Local adaptation and the evolution of species' ranges under climate change. - J. Theor. Biol. 266: 449-457.
5. Behrman K. D. and Kirkpatrick M. 2011. Species range expansion by beneficial mutations. - J. Evol. Biol. 24: 665-675.
6. Bell G. and Gonzalez A. 2011. Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations experiencing environmental deterioration. - Science 332: 1327-1330.
7. Bocedi G. et al. 2012. Projecting species' range expansion dynamics: sources of systematic biases when scaling up patterns and processes. - Methods Ecol. Evol. 3: 1008-1018.
8. Bourguet D. et al. 2004. Fitness costs of insecticide resistance in natural breeding sites of the mosquito Culex pipiens. - Evolution 58: 128-135.
9. Bridle J. and Vines T. 2007. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail?- Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 140-147.
10. Bridle J. et al. 2010. Why is adaptation prevented at ecological margins? New insights from individual-based simulations. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 485-494.
11. Brooker R. W. et al. 2007. Modelling species' range shifts in a changing climate: the impacts of biotic interactions, dispersal distance and the rate of climate change. - J. Theor. Biol. 245: 59-65.
12. Brown J. S. and Pavlovic N. B. 1992. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effects of migration on habitat specialization. - Evol. Ecol. 6: 360-382.
13. Bürger R. 2000. The mathematical theory of selection, recombination, and mutation. - Wiley.
14. Case T. and Taper M. 2000. Interspecific competition, environmental gradients, gene flow, and the coevolution of species' borders. - Am. Nat. 155: 583-605.
15. Davis M. B. and Shaw R. G. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. - Science 292: 673-679.
16. Day T. 2000. Competition and the effect of spatial resource heterogeneity on evolutionary diversification. - Am. Nat. 155: 790-803.
17. Dytham C. 2009. Evolved dispersal strategies at range margins. - Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1407-1413.
18. Dytham C. and Travis J. 2006. Evolving dispersal and age at death. - Oikos 113: 530-538.
19. Fisher R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. - Clarendon Press.
20. Fortin M.-J. et al. 2005. species' geographic ranges and distributional limits: pattern analysis and statistical issues. - Oikos 108: 7-17.
21. Fournier-Level A. et al. 2011. A map of local adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. - Science 334: 86-89.
22. Frean M. et al. 2013. The effect of population structure on the rate of evolution. - Proc. R. Soc. B 280: 20130211.
23. Futuyma D. and Moreno G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 207-233.
24. Garcia-Ramos G. and Kirkpatrick M. 1997. Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. - Evolution 51: 21-28.
25. Gastner M. T. et al. 2009. Transition from connected to fragmented vegetation across an environmental gradient: scaling laws in ecotone geometry. - Am. Nat. 174: E23-E39.
26. Gomulkiewicz R. et al. 1999. The effects of density dependence and immigration on local adaptation and niche evolution in a black-hole sink environment. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 55: 283-296.
27. Gomulkiewicz R. et al. 2010. Genetics, adaptation, and invasion in harsh environments. - Evol. Appl. 3: 97-108.
28. Greene D. F. et al. 2004. An evaluation of alternative dispersal functions for trees. - J. Ecol. 92: 758-766.
29. Haldane J. B. S. 1957. The cost of natural selection. - J. Genet. 55: 511-524.
30. Hedrick P. W. 2006. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: the age of genomics. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 67-93.
31. Hoffmann A. A. et al. 2003. Low potential for climatic stress adaptation in a rainforest drosophila species. - Science 301: 100-102.
32. Holt R. D. 1996. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism. - Evol. Ecol. 10: 1-11.
33. Holt R. D. 2009. Colloquium papers: bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 19659-19665.
34. Holt R. D. 2011. Evolution in source-sink environments: implications for niche conservatism. - In: Liu J.et al.(eds), Sources, sinks and sustainability. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 23-57.
35. Holt R. and Gaines M. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes - implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. - Evol. Ecol. 6: 433-447.
36. Holt R. and Gomulkiewicz R. 1997. How does immigration influence local adaptation? A reexamination of a familiar paradigm. - Am. Nat. 149: 563-572.
37. Holt R. D. and Barfield M. 2011. Theoretical perspectives on the statics and dynamics of species' borders in patchy environments. - Am. Nat. 178: S6-S25.
38. Holt R. D. et al. 2011. Predation and the evolutionary dynamics of species ranges. - Am. Nat. 178: 488-500.
39. Houle D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. - Genetics 130: 195-204.
40. Hutchinson G. E. 1978. An introduction to population ecology. - Yale Univ. Press.
41. Kassen R. 2002. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. - J. Evol. Biol. 15: 173-190.
42. Kawecki T. J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. - Evol. Ecol. 9: 38-44.
43. Kawecki T. J. 2000. Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of the dispersal rate on the fate of alleles with small and large effects. - Proc. R. Soc. B 267: 1315-1320.
44. Kawecki T. J. 2008. Adaptation to marginal habitats. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39: 321-342.
45. Kellermann V. et al. 2009. Fundamental evolutionary limits in ecological traits drive drosophila species distributions. - Science 325: 1244-1246.
46. Kimbrell T. 2010. Canalization and adaptation in a landscape of sources and sinks. - Evol. Ecol. 24: 891-909.
47. Kimbrell T. and Holt R. D. 2007. Canalization breakdown and evolution in a source-sink system. - Am. Nat. 169: 370-382.
48. Kirkpatrick M. and Barton N. 1997. Evolution of a species' range. - Am. Nat. 150: 1-23.
49. Kunin W. E. et al. 2009. Variation at range margins across multiple spatial scales: environmental temperature, population genetics and metabolomic phenotype. - Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1495-1506.
50. Lavergne S. et al. 2010. Biodiversity and climate change: integrating evolutionary and ecological responses of species and communities- Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41: 321-350.
51. Leimu R. and Fischer M. 2008. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. - PLoS One 3: e4010.
52. Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. - Princeton Univ. Press.
53. Lieberman E. et al. 2005. Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. - Nature 433: 312-316.
54. Malcom J. W. 2011. Smaller gene networks permit longer persistence in fast-changing environments. - PLoS One 6: e14747.
55. McInerny G. et al. 2007. Range shifting on a fragmented landscape. - Ecol. Inform. 2: 1-8.
56. McInerny G. J. et al. 2009. How range shifts induced by climate change affect neutral evolution. - Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1527-1534.
57. Norberg J. et al. 2012. Eco-evolutionary responses of biodiversity to climate change. - Nat. Clim. Change 2: 747-751.
58. North A. et al. 2011. Local adaptation in a changing world: the roles of gene-flow, mutation, and sexual reproduction. - Evolution 65: 79-89.
59. Orr H. A. 2005. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. - Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 119-127.
60. Phillips B. L. 2012. Range shift promotes the formation of stable range edges. - J. Biogeogr. 39: 153-161.
61. Price T. D. and Kirkpatrick M. 2009. Evolutionarily stable range limits set by interspecific competition. - Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1429-1434.
62. Pulliam H. R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. - Ecol. Lett. 3: 349-361.
63. Ronce O. and Kirkpatrick M. 2001. When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. - Evolution 55: 1520-1531.
64. Roughgarden J. 1972. Evolution of niche width. - Am. Nat. 106: 683-718.
65. Roy D. B. and Thomas J. A. 2003. Seasonal variation in the niche, habitat availability and population fluctuations of a Bivoltine thermophilous insect near its range margin. - Oecologia 134: 439-444.
66. Schiffers K. and Travis J. M. J. 2014. ALADYN - a spatially explicit, allelic model for simulating adaptive dynamics. - Ecography 37: 1288-1291
67. Schiffers K. et al. 2012. Limited evolutionary rescue of locally adapted populations facing climate change. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368: 20120083.
68. Sexton J. et al. 2009. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 415-436.
69. Siepielski A. M. et al. 2013. The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection. - Ecol. Lett. 16: 1382-1392.
70. Singer A. et al. 2013. Interspecific interactions affect species and community responses to climate shifts. - Oikos 122: 358-366.
71. Soberón J. 2007. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. - Ecol. Lett. 10: 1115-1123.
72. Svenning J.-C.et al 2014. The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates. - Ecography 37: 1198-1209.