Local adaptation and the evolution of species' ranges under climate change

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 266, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 449-457

  Atkins, K E ^a,b   Travis, J M J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental gradient; Environmental niche; Extinction; Local density dependence; Species' range

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATION; BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; EVOLUTION; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; LOCAL EXTINCTION; NUMERICAL METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; SESSILE SPECIES; STOCHASTICITY;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENOTYPE; HOME RANGE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SESSILE SPECIES; SIMULATION; SPECIES EXTINCTION; SPECIES HABITAT; STOCHASTIC MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77955077603     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.07.014     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alleaume-Benharira M., Pen I.R., Ronce O. Geographical patterns of adaptation within a species' range: interactions between drift and gene flow. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2006, 19:203-215.
2. Araujo M.B., Whittaker R.J., Ladle R.J., Erhard M. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2005, 14:529-538.
3. Artzy-Randrup Y., Kondrashov A.S. Sympatric speciation under incompatibility selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:11619-11624.
4. Ayres M.P., Scriber J.M. Local adaptation to regional climates in Papilio canadensis (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Ecological Monographs 1994, 64:465-482.
5. Bakkenes M., Alkemade J.R.M., Ihle F. Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology 2002, 8:390-407.
6. Bolnick D.I. Multi-species outcomes in a common model of sympatric speciation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2006, 241:734-744.
7. Broennimann O., Thuiller W., Hughes G., Midgley G.F., Alkemades J.M.R., Guisan A. Do geographic distribution, niche property and life form explain plants' vulnerability to global change?. Global Change Biology 2006, 12:1079-1093.
8. Brooker R.W., Travis J.M.J., Clark E.J., Dytham C. Modelling species' range shifts in a changing climate: the impacts of biotic interactions, dispersal distance and the rate of climate change. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2007, 245:59-65.
9. Burton, O.J., Phillips, B.L., Travis, J.M.J., in press. Trade-offs and the evolution of life-histories during range expansion. Ecology Letters. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01505.x.
10. Burton O.J., Travis J.M.J. The frequency of fitness peak shifts is increased at expanding range margins due to mutation surfing. Genetics 2008, 179:941-950.
11. Burton O.J., Travis J.M.J. Landscape structure and boundary effects determine the fate of mutations occurring during range expansions. Heredity 2008, 101:329-340.
12. Burton O.J., Phillips B.L., Travis J.M.J. The dynamics of climate-induced range shifting; perspectives from simulation modelling. Oikos 2009, 118:131-137.
13. 2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Global Change Biology 2001, 7:357-373.
14. Davis M.B., Shaw R.G., Etterson J.R. Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 2005, 86:1704-1714.
15. Doebeli, M., Dieckmann, U., 2003. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421 (6920), 259-264.
16. Dytham C. Evolved dispersal strategies at range margins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 276:1407-1413.
17. Excoffier L., Ray N. Surfing during population expansions promotes genetic revolutions and structuration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2008, 23:347-351.
18. Feminella J.W., Matthews W.J. Intraspecific differences in thermal tolerance of Etheostoma spectible (agassiz) in constant versus fluctuating environments. Journal of Fish Biology 1984, 25:455-461.
19. Garcia-Ramos G., Rodriguez D. Evolutionary speed of species' invasions. Evolution 2002, 56:661-668.
20. Gavin D.G., Hu F.S. Bioclimatic modelling using Gaussian mixture distributions and multiscale segmentation. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2005, 14:491-501.
21. Hampe A. Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2004, 13:469-471.
22. Kirkpatrick M., Barton N.H. Evolution of a species' range. American Naturalist 1997, 150:1-23.
23. Klopfstein S., Currat M., Excoffier L. The fate of mutations surfing on the wave of a range expansion. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006, 23:482-490.
24. Lambrechts M.M., Perret P., Blondel J. Adaptive differences in the timing of egg laying between different populations of birds result from variation in photoresponsiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1996, 263:19-22.
25. Lawton, J., 2000. In: Hutchings, M.J., John, E., Stewart, A.J.A. (Eds.), Ecological Consequences of Heterogeneity. Cambridge University Press (concluding Remarks: a Review of Some Open Questions).
26. McNeilly T., Antonovic J. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations 4: barriers to gene flow. Heredity 1968, 23:205.
27. Midgley G.F., Hannah L., Millar D., Rutherford M.C., Powrie L. Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2002, 11:445-451.
28. Morales P., Sykes M.T., Prentice I.C., Smith P., Smith B., Bugmann H., Zierl B., Friedlingstein P., Viovy N., Sabate S., Sanchez A., Pla E., Gracia C.A., Sitch S., Arneth A., Ogee J. Comparing and evaluating process-based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes. Global Change Biology 2005, 11:2211-2233.
29. Olsson M., Uller T. Thermal environment, survival and local adaptation in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2003, 5:431-437.
30. Parmesan C., Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 2003, 421:37-42.
31. Pearson R.G., Dawson T.P. Predicting the impact of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2003, 12:361-371.
32. Pearson R.G., Dawson T.P., Berry P.M. A spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecological Modelling 2002, 154:289-300.
33. Pease C.M., Lande R., Bull J.J. A model of population growth, dispersal and evolution in a changing environment. Ecology 1989, 70:1657-1664.
34. Pertoldi C., Bach L.A. Evolutionary aspects of climate-induced changes and the need for multidisciplinarity. Journal of Thermal Biology 2007, 32:118-124.
35. Peterson A.T., Ortega-Huerta M.A., Bartley J., Sanchez-Cordero V., Soberon J., Buddemeier R.H., Stockwell D.R.B. Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 2002, 416:626-629.
36. Phillips B.L., Brown G.P., Webb J.K., Shine R. Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 2006, 439:7078.
37. Polechová J., Barton N., Marion G. Species' range: adaptation in space and time. American Naturalist 2009, 174:E186-E204.
38. Riihimaki M., Podolsky R., Kuitten H., Koelewijn H., Savolainen O. Studying genetics of adaptive variation in model organisms: flowering time variation in Arabidopsis lyrata. Genetica 2005, 123:63-74.
39. Santamaria L., Figuerola J., Pilon J.J., Mjelde M., Green A.J., Boer T.D., King R.A., Gornall R.J. Plant performance across latitude: the role of plasticity and local adaptation in an aquatic plant. Ecology 2003, 84:2454-2461.
40. Schwarz M.W., Iverson L.R., Prasad A.M., Matthews S.N., O'Connor R.J. Predicting extinctions as a result of climate change. Ecology 2006, 87:1611-1615.
41. Takenaka A. Local coexistence of tree species and the dynamics of global distribution pattern along an environmental gradient: a simulation study. Ecological Research 2004, 20:297-304.
42. Termansen M., McClean C.G., Preston C.D. The use of genetic algorithms and Bayesian classification to model species distributions. Ecological Modelling 2006, 192:410-424.
43. Thomas C.D., Cameron A., Green R.E., Bakkenes M., Beaumont L.J., Collingham Y.C., Erasmus B.F.N., de Siqueira M.F., Grainger A., Hannah L., Hughes L., Huntley B., van Jaarsveld A.S., Midgley G.F., Miles L., Ortega-Huerta M.A., Peterson A.T., Phillips O.L., Williams S.E. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 2004, 427:145-147.
44. Thuiller W., Lavorel S., Araujo M.B. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2005, 102:8245-8250.
45. Travis J.M.J., Brooker R.W., Clark E.J., Dytham C. The distribution of positive and negative species interactions across environmental gradients on a dual-lattice model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2006, 241:896-902.
46. Travis J.M.J., Dytham C. Dispersal evolution during invasions. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2002, 4:1119-1129.
47. Travis J.M.J., Munkemuller T., Burton O.J., Best A.S., Dytham C., Johst K. Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007, 24:2334-2343.
48. Travis J.M.J., Mustin K., Benton T.G., Dytham C. Accelerating invasion rates result from the evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2009, 259:151-158.
49. Walther G.-R., Post E., Convey P., Menzel A., Parmesan C., Beebee T.J.C., Fromentin J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg O., Bairlein F. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 2002, 416:389-395.
50. Woodward F.I., Beerling D.J. The dynamics of vegetation change: health warnings for equilibrium 'dodo' models. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 1997, 6:413-418.
51. Yukilevich R., True J.R. Divergent outcomes of reinforcement speciation: the relative importance of assortative mating and migration modification. American Naturalist 2006, 167:638-654.