How does pollen versus seed dispersal affect niche evolution?

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 792-805

  Aguilée, Robin ^a,b   Shaw, Frank H ^c   Rousset, François ^a   Shaw, Ruth G ^d   Ronce, Ophélie ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b École Nationale de Formation Agronomique   (France)

^c HAMLINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Demography; Gene flow; Genetic variance; Local adaptation; Secondary contact; Source sink dynamics

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; EXTINCTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; HABITAT USE; HETEROGENEITY; NICHE; POLLEN; POPULATION GROWTH; RANGE EXPANSION; SEED DISPERSAL; SIMULATION;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; PHENOTYPE; POLLEN; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEED DISPERSAL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; POLLEN; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEED DISPERSAL; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84871867788     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01816.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Antonovics, J., 1968. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. V. Evolution of self-fertility. Heredity 23:219-238.
2. Antonovics, J. 2006. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. X. Long-term persistence of prereproductive isolation at a mine boundary. Heredity 97:33-37.
3. Antonovics, J., T. J. Newman, and B. J. Best 2001. Spatially explicit studies on the ecology and genetics of population margins. Pp. 91-116 in J. Silvertown and J. Antonovics, eds. Integrating ecology and evolution in a spatial context. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK
4. Balkau, B. J., and M. W. Feldman 1973. Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74:171-174.
5. Barton, N. H. 2001. Adaptation at the edge of a species' range. Pp. 365-392 in J. Silvertown and J. Antonovics, eds. Integrating ecology and evolution in a spatial context. Blackwell Science, New York
6. Bradshaw, A. D. 1991. The croonian lecture, 1991: genostasis and the limits to evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 333:289-305.
7. Bridle, J. R., and T. H. Vines 2007. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 140-147.
8. Butlin, R. K., J. R. Bridle, and M. Kawata 2003. Genetics and the boundaries of species' distributions. Pp. 274-295 in T. M. Blackburn and K. J. Gaston, eds. Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK
9. Charlesworth, D. 2003. Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Bio. 358:1051-1070.
10. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth 1995. Quantitative genetics in plants: the effect of breeding system on genetic variability. Evolution 49:911-920.
11. Ellstrand, N. C., H. C. Prentice, and J. F. Hancock 1999. Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 30:539-563.
12. Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, M. D. Eldridge, R. C. Lacy, K. Ralls, M. R. Dudash, and C. B. Fenster 2011. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 25:465-475.
13. Gomulkiewicz, R., and D. Houle 2009. Demographic and genetic constraints on evolution. Am. Nat. 174:E218-E229.
14. Gomulkiewicz, R., R. D. Holt, and M. Barfield 1999. The effects of density dependence and immigration on local adaptation and niche evolution in a black-hole sink environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55:283-296.
15. Holt, R. D. 1996a. Adaptive evolution in source-sink environments: direct and indirect effects of density-dependence on niche evolution. Oikos 75:182-192.
16. Holt, R. D. 1996b. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism. Evol. Ecol. 10:1-11.
17. Holt, R. D. 2009. Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:19659-19665.
18. Holt, R. D., and M. Barfield 2011. Theoretical perspectives on the statics and dynamics of species' borders in patchy environments. Am. Nat. 178:S6-S25.
19. Holt, R. D., and M. S. Gaines 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evol. Ecol. 6:433-447.
20. Holt, R. D., and R. Gomulkiewicz 1997a. The evolution of species' niches: a population dynamics perspective. Pp. 25-50 in E. G. Othmer, F. R. Adler, M. A. Lewis, and J. C. Dallon, eds. Cas studies in mathematical modelling: ecology, physiology and cell biology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
21. Holt, R. D., and R. Gomulkiewicz 1997b. How does immigration influence local adaptation? A reexamination of a familiar paradigm. Am. Nat. 149:563-572.
22. Holt, R. D., R. Gomulkiewicz, and M. Barfield 2003. The phenomenology of niche evolution via quantitative traits in a 'black-hole' sink. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Bio. 270:215-224.
23. Hu, X. S., and R. A. Ennos 1999. Impacts of seed and pollen flow on population genetic structure for plant genomes with three contrasting modes of inheritance. Genetics 152:441-450.
24. Hu, X.-S., and F. He 2006. Seed and pollen flow in expanding a species' range. J. Theor. Biol. 240:662-672.
25. Hu, X.-S., and B. Li 2001. Assessment of the ratio of pollen to seed flow in a cline for genetic variation in a quantitative trait. Heredity 87:400-409.
26. Hu, X.-S., and B. Li 2002. Seed and pollen flow and cline discordance among genes with different modes of inheritance. Heredity 88: 212-217.
27. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. A treatise on limnology. Wiley and Sons, New York
28. Kawecki, T. J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evol. Ecol. 9:38-44.
29. Kawecki, T. J. 2000. Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of the dispersal rate on the fate of alleles with small and large effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Bio. 267:1315-1320.
30. Kawecki, T. J. 2003. Sex-biased dispersal and adaptation to marginal habitats. Am. Nat. 162:415-426.
31. Kawecki, T. J. 2008. Adaptation to marginal habitats. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39:321-342.
32. Knight, T. M., J. A. Steets, J. C. Vamosi, S. J. Mazer, M. Burd, D. R. Campbell, M. R. Dudash, M. O. Johnston, R. J. Mitchell, and T. L. Ashman, 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:467-497.
33. Kremer, A., O. Ronce, J. J. Robledo Arnuncio, F. Guillaume, G. Bohrer, R. Nathan, J. R. Bridle, R. Gomulkiewicz, E. K. Klein, K. Ritland, et al 2012. Long distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 15:378-392.
34. Lopez, S., F. Rousset, F. H. Shaw, R. G. Shaw, and O. Ronce 2008. Migration load in plants: role of pollen and seed dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes. J. Evol. Biol. 21:294-309.
35. Lopez, S., F. Rousset, F. H. Shaw, R. G. Shaw, and O. Ronce 2009. Joint effects of inbreeding and local adaptation on the evolution of genetic load after fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 23:1618-1627.
36. McNeilly, T. 1968. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. III. Agrostis tenuis on a small copper mine. Heredity 23:99-108.
37. McNeilly, T., and J. Antonovics 1968. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. IV. Barriers to gene flow. Heredity 23:205-218.
38. McPeek, M. A., and R. D. Holt 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 140:1010-1027.
39. Nagylaki, T. 1997. The diffusion model for migration and selection in a plant population. J. Math. Biol. 35:409-431.
40. Ouborg, N. J., Y. Piquot, and J. M. V. Groenendael 1999. Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. J. Ecol. 87:551-568.
41. Petit, R. J., J. Duminl, S. Fineschi, A. Hampe, D. Salvini, and G. G. Vendramin 2005. Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Mol. Ecol. 14: 689-701.
42. Polechová, J., N. Barton, and G. Marion 2009. Species' range: adaptation in space and time. Am. Nat. 174:E186-E204.
43. Ravigné, V., I. Olivieri, S. C. González-Martínez, and F. Rousset, 2006. Selective interactions between short-distance pollen and seed dispersal in self-compatible species. Evolution 60:2257-2271.
44. Richards, C. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am. Nat. 155:383-394.
45. Ronce, O., and M. Kirkpatrick 2001. When sources become sinks: migration meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution 55:1520-1531.
46. Ronce, O., F. H. Shaw, F. Rousset, and R. G. Shaw 2009. Is inbreeding depression lower in maladapted population? A quantitative genetics model. Evolution 63:1807-1819.
47. Sakai, A. K., F. W. Allendorf, J. S. Holt, D. M. Lodge, J. Molofsky, K. A. With, S. Baughman, R. J. Cabin, J. E. Cohen, N. C. Ellstrand, et al 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 32:305-332.
48. Sexton, J. P., P. J. McIntyre, A. L. Angert, and K. J. Rice 2009. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:415-436.
49. Thrall, P. H., C. M. Richards, D. E. McCauley, and J. Antonovics 1998. Metapopulation collapse: the consequences of limited gene-flow in spatially structured populations. Pp. 83-104 in J. Bascompte and R. V. Sole, eds. Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Academic Press, New York, NY.
50. Tufto, J. 2001. Effects of releasing maladapted individuals: a demographic-evolutionary model. Am. Nat. 158:331-340.
51. van Valen, L. 1971. Group selection and the evolution of dispersal. Evolution 25:591-598.
52. Wagenius, S. 2004. Style persistence, pollen limitation, and seed set in the common prairie plant Echinacea angustifolia (Asteraceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 165:595-603.
53. Yeaman, S., and M. C. Whitlock 2011. The genetic architecture of adaptation under migration-selection balance. Evolution 65:1897-1911.