Oscillatory control of bHLH factors in neural progenitors

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 531-538

  Imayoshi, Itaru ^a,b,c   Kageyama, Ryoichiro ^a,b,c  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

BHLH; Fate determination; Multipotent; Neural progenitor cell; Oscillation

Indexed keywords

BASIC HELIX LOOP HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ADULT STEM CELL; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL FATE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL RENEWAL; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NEURAL STEM CELL; OSCILLATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STABLE EXPRESSION; ANIMAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; NEURAL STEM CELLS;

EID: 84912532027     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: 1878108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.07.006     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Caviness V.S., et al. Numbers, time and neocortical neuronogenesis: a general developmental and evolutionary model. Trends Neurosci. 1995, 18:379-383.
2. Fishell G., Kriegstein A.R. Neurons from radial glia: the consequences of asymmetric inheritance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2003, 13:34-41.
3. Borrell V., Gotz M. Role of radial glial cells in cerebral cortex folding. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014, 27:39-46.
4. Breunig J.J., et al. Neural stem cells: historical perspective and future prospects. Neuron 2011, 70:614-625.
5. Imayoshi I., Kageyama R. bHLH factors in self-renewal, multipotency, and fate choice of neural progenitor cells. Neuron 2014, 82:9-23.
6. Ming G.L., Song H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron 2011, 70:687-702.
7. Aimone J.B., et al. Resolving new memories: a critical look at the dentate gyrus, adult neurogenesis, and pattern separation. Neuron 2011, 70:589-596.
8. Lepousez G., et al. The impact of adult neurogenesis on olfactory bulb circuits and computations. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2013, 75:339-363.
9. Ross S.E., et al. Basic helix-loop-helix factors in cortical development. Neuron 2003, 39:13-25.
10. Bertrand N., et al. Proneural genes and the specification of neural cell types. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:517-530.
11. Meijer D.H., et al. Separated at birth? The functional and molecular divergence of OLIG1 and OLIG2. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13:819-831.
12. Shimojo H., et al. Oscillations in notch signaling regulate maintenance of neural progenitors. Neuron 2008, 58:52-64.
13. Imayoshi I., et al. Oscillatory control of factors determining multipotency and fate in mouse neural progenitors. Science 2013, 342:1203-1208.
14. Pierfelice T., et al. Notch in the vertebrate nervous system: an old dog with new tricks. Neuron 2011, 69:840-855.
15. Ables J.L., et al. Not(ch) just development: Notch signalling in the adult brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 12:269-283.
16. Kageyama R., et al. The Hes gene family: repressors and oscillators that orchestrate embryogenesis. Development 2007, 134:1243-1251.
17. Kopan R., Ilagan M.X. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 2009, 137:216-233.
18. Hatakeyama J., et al. Hes genes regulate size, shape and histogenesis of the nervous system by control of the timing of neural stem cell differentiation. Development 2004, 131:5539-5550.
19. Imayoshi I., et al. Hes genes and neurogenin regulate non-neural versus neural fate specification in the dorsal telencephalic midline. Development 2008, 135:2531-2541.
20. Nelson B.R., et al. Dynamic interactions between intermediate neurogenic progenitors and radial glia in embryonic mouse neocortex: potential role in Dll1-Notch signaling. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:9122-9139.
21. Hatakeyama J., et al. Cadherin-based adhesions in the apical endfoot are required for active Notch signaling to control neurogenesis in vertebrates. Development 2014, 141:1671-1682.
22. Kageyama R., et al. Dynamic Notch signaling in neural progenitor cells and a revised view of lateral inhibition. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1247-1251.
23. Kriegstein A.R., Alvarez-Buylla A. The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 32:149-184.
24. Wilkinson G., et al. Proneural genes in neocortical development. Neuroscience 2013, 253:256-273.
25. Schuurmans C., et al. Sequential phases of cortical specification involve Neurogenin-dependent and -independent pathways. EMBO J. 2004, 23:2892-2902.
26. Castro D.S., et al. Proneural bHLH and Brn proteins coregulate a neurogenic program through cooperative binding to a conserved DNA motif. Dev. Cell 2006, 11:831-844.
27. Fode C., et al. A role for neural determination genes in specifying the dorsoventral identity of telencephalic neurons. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:67-80.
28. Parras C.M., et al. Divergent functions of the proneural genes Mash1 and Ngn2 in the specification of neuronal subtype identity. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:324-338.
29. Castro D.S., et al. A novel function of the proneural factor Ascl1 in progenitor proliferation identified by genome-wide characterization of its targets. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:930-945.
30. Castro D.S., Guillemot F. Old and new functions of proneural factors revealed by the genome-wide characterization of their transcriptional targets. Cell Cycle 2011, 10:4026-4031.
31. Rowitch D.H., Kriegstein A.R. Developmental genetics of vertebrate glial-cell specification. Nature 2010, 468:214-222.
32. Sloan S.A., Barres B.A. Mechanisms of astrocyte development and their contributions to neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014, 27:75-81.
33. Zhou Q., Anderson D.J. The bHLH transcription factors OLIG2 and OLIG1 couple neuronal and glial subtype specification. Cell 2002, 109:61-73.
34. Lu Q.R., et al. Common developmental requirement for Olig function indicates a motor neuron/oligodendrocyte connection. Cell 2002, 109:75-86.
35. Takebayashi H., et al. The basic helix-loop-helix factor olig2 is essential for the development of motoneuron and oligodendrocyte lineages. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:1157-1163.
36. Sun Y., et al. Phosphorylation state of Olig2 regulates proliferation of neural progenitors. Neuron 2011, 69:906-917.
37. Namihira M., Nakashima K. Mechanisms of astrocytogenesis in the mammalian brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2013, 23:921-927.
38. Hirata H., et al. Instability of Hes7 protein is crucial for the somite segmentation clock. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:750-754.
39. Harima Y., Kageyama R. Oscillatory links of Fgf signaling and Hes7 in the segmentation clock. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2013, 23:484-490.
40. Hirata H., et al. Oscillatory expression of the bHLH factor Hes1 regulated by a negative feedback loop. Science 2002, 298:840-843.
41. Bonev B., et al. MicroRNA-9 modulates Hes1 ultradian oscillations by forming a double-negative feedback loop. Cell Rep. 2012, 2:10-18.
42. Tan S.L., et al. MicroRNA9 regulates neural stem cell differentiation by controlling Hes1 expression dynamics in the developing brain. Genes Cells 2012, 17:952-961.
43. Sriuranpong V., et al. Notch signaling induces rapid degradation of Achaete-Scute Homolog 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:3129-3139.
44. Vinals F., et al. BMP-2 decreases Mash1 stability by increasing Id1 expression. EMBO J. 2004, 23:3527-3537.
45. Knuckles P., et al. Drosha regulates neurogenesis by controlling neurogenin 2 expression independent of microRNAs. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:962-969.
46. Ali F., et al. Cell cycle-regulated multi-site phosphorylation of Neurogenin 2 coordinates cell cycling with differentiation during neurogenesis. Development 2011, 138:4267-4277.
47. Hindley C., et al. Post-translational modification of Ngn2 differentially affects transcription of distinct targets to regulate the balance between progenitor maintenance and differentiation. Development 2012, 139:1718-1723.
48. Ali F.R., et al. The phosphorylation status of Ascl1 is a key determinant of neuronal differentiation and maturation in vivo and in vitro. Development 2014, 141:2216-2224.
49. Lee S.K., et al. Olig2 and Ngn2 function in opposition to modulate gene expression in motor neuron progenitor cells. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:282-294.
50. Novitch B.G., et al. Coordinate regulation of motor neuron subtype identity and pan-neuronal properties by the bHLH repressor Olig2. Neuron 2001, 31:773-789.
51. Casarosa S., et al. Mash1 regulates neurogenesis in the ventral telencephalon. Development 1999, 126:525-534.
52. Kamakura S., et al. Hes binding to STAT3 mediates crosstalk between Notch and JAK-STAT signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6:547-554.
53. Yoshiura S., et al. Ultradian oscillations of Stat, Smad, and Hes1 expression in response to serum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:11292-11297.
54. Silva-Vargas V., et al. Adult neural stem cells and their niche: a dynamic duo during homeostasis, regeneration, and aging. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2013, 23:935-942.
55. Ninkovic J., Gotz M. Fate specification in the adult brain - lessons for eliciting neurogenesis from glial cells. Bioessays 2013, 35:242-252.
56. Imayoshi I., et al. Genetic methods to identify and manipulate newly born neurons in the adult brain. Front. Neurosci. 2011, 5. 10.3389/fnins.2011.00064.
57. Ponti G., et al. Cell cycle and lineage progression of neural progenitors in the ventricular-subventricular zones of adult mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:E1045-E1054.
58. Alonso M., et al. Activation of adult-born neurons facilitates learning and memory. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:897-904.
59. Lledo P.M., et al. Adult neurogenesis and functional plasticity in neuronal circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7:179-193.
60. Imayoshi I., et al. Roles of continuous neurogenesis in the structural and functional integrity of the adult forebrain. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1153-1161.
61. Nakashiba T., et al. Young dentate granule cells mediate pattern separation, whereas old granule cells facilitate pattern completion. Cell 2012, 149:188-201.
62. Gu Y., et al. Optical controlling reveals time-dependent roles for adult-born dentate granule cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:1700-1706.
63. Zhao C., et al. Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell 2008, 132:645-660.
64. Imayoshi I., et al. Essential roles of Notch signaling in maintenance of neural stem cells in developing and adult brains. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:3489-3498.
65. Imayoshi I., Kageyama R. The role of Notch signaling in adult neurogenesis. Mol. Neurobiol. 2011, 44:7-12.
66. Nyfeler Y., et al. Jagged1 signals in the postnatal subventricular zone are required for neural stem cell self-renewal. EMBO J. 2005, 24:3504-3515.
67. Veeraraghavalu K., et al. Presenilin 1 mutants impair the self-renewal and differentiation of adult murine subventricular zone-neuronal progenitors via cell-autonomous mechanisms involving notch signaling. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:6903-6915.
68. Ehm O., et al. RBPJkappa-dependent signaling is essential for long-term maintenance of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:13794-13807.
69. Ables J.L., et al. Notch1 is required for maintenance of the reservoir of adult hippocampal stem cells. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:10484-10492.
70. Lugert S., et al. Quiescent and active hippocampal neural stem cells with distinct morphologies respond selectively to physiological and pathological stimuli and aging. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6:445-456.
71. Baek J.H., et al. Persistent and high levels of Hes1 expression regulate boundary formation in the developing central nervous system. Development 2006, 133:2467-2476.
72. Pastrana E., et al. Simultaneous prospective purification of adult subventricular zone neural stem cells and their progeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:6387-6392.
73. Codega P., et al. Prospective identification and purification of quiescent adult neural stem cells from their in vivo niche. Neuron 2014, 82:545-559.
74. Kim E.J., et al. Ascl1 (Mash1) defines cells with long-term neurogenic potential in subgranular and subventricular zones in adult mouse brain. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18472.
75. Mich J.K., et al. Prospective identification of functionally distinct stem cells and neurosphere-initiating cells in adult mouse forebrain. ELife (Cambridge) 2014, 3:e02669.
76. Jessberger S., et al. Directed differentiation of hippocampal stem/progenitor cells in the adult brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:888-893.
77. Takashima Y., et al. Intronic delay is essential for oscillatory expression in the segmentation clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:3300-3305.
78. Noctor S.C., et al. Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:136-144.
79. Miyata T., et al. Asymmetric production of surface-dividing and non-surface-dividing cortical progenitor cells. Development 2004, 131:3133-3145.
80. Haubensak W., et al. Neurons arise in the basal neuroepithelium of the early mammalian telencephalon: a major site of neurogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:3196-3201.
81. Greig L.C., et al. Molecular logic of neocortical projection neuron specification, development and diversity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14:755-769.
82. Doetsch F., et al. Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain. Cell 1999, 97:703-716.
83. Wang X., et al. Spatiotemporal control of gene expression by a light-switchable transgene system. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:266-269.
84. Ma Z., et al. Fine tuning the LightOn light-switchable transgene expression system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 440:419-423.
85. Monk N.A. Oscillatory expression of Hes1, p53, and NF-kappaB driven by transcriptional time delays. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1409-1413.
86. Lewis J. Autoinhibition with transcriptional delay: a simple mechanism for the zebrafish somitogenesis oscillator. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1398-1408.
87. Jensen M.H., et al. Sustained oscillations and time delays in gene expression of protein Hes1. FEBS Lett. 2003, 541:176-177.
88. Harima Y., et al. Accelerating the tempo of the segmentation clock by reducing the number of introns in the Hes7 gene. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:1-7.