It's a man's world?: Male and female election campaigning on the internet

Journal of Political Marketing

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 41-67

  Carlson, Tom ^a  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Candidate gender; Electioneering; Female candidates; Internet; Web sites

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249707886     PISSN: 15377857     EISSN: 15377865     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J199v06n01_03     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Banwart, M. C., & Kaid, L. L. (2002, August). Videostyle and Webstyle: An Interchannel Comparison of Candidate Self Presentation. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
2. Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 868-876.
3. Braden, M. (1996). Women Politicians and the Media. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.
4. Bystrom, D. G., & Miller, J. L. (1999). Gendered Communication Styles and Strategies in Campaign 1996: The Videostyles of Women and Men Candidates. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The Electronic Election: Perspectives on the 1996 Campaign Communication (pp. 293-302). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Carlson, T. (2000). Kon och politisk marknadsföring: en analys av finländska manliga och kvinnliga riksdagskandidaters TV-reklam (Gender and Political Marketing: An Analysis of Finnish Male and Female Parliamentary Candidates' Political Advertising on Television). Nordicom-Information, 22, 87-102.
6. Carlson, T. (2001). Gender and Political Advertising Across Cultures: A Comparison of Male and Female Political Advertising in Finland and the US. European Journal of Communication, 16, 131-154.
7. Carlson, T., & Djupsund, G. (2001). Old Wine in New Bottles? The 1999 Finnish Election Campaign on the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6: 68-87.
8. D'Alessio, D. (2000). Adoption of the World Wide Web by American Political Candidates, 1996-1998, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 556-568.
9. Devitt, J. (2002). Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Female Gubernatorial Candidates and the Press. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 445-463.
10. European Commission (2002). Flash Eurobarometer 135: Internet and the Public at Large. Brussels: European Commission.
11. European Commission/ZES/FSD (2002-2003). Flash Eurobarometer 135: Internet and the Public at Large 5, May-June 2002 [Electronic Data File]. European Commission, DG Press and Communication, Unit B/1 Opinion Polls, Press Reviews, Europe Direct & EOS Gallup Europe [Originator]. Cologne: Zentralarchiv fr Empirische Sozialforschung [Data Distributor]. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive [Data Distributor].
12. Farrell, D. M. (1996). Campaign Strategies and Tactics. In L. Leduc, R. G. Nieini, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective (pp. 160-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Gibson, R. K., & Ward, S. J. (2000). A Proposed Methodology for Studying the Function and Effectiveness of Party and Candidate Web Sites. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 301-319.
14. Gibson, R. K., & Ward, S. J. (2002). Virtual Campaigning: Australian Parties and the Impact of the Internet. Australian Journal of Political Science, 37, 99-129.
15. Greer, J., & LaPointe, M. (2001, August). Cyber-campaigning Grows Up: A Comparative Content Analysis of Senatorial and Gubernatorial Candidates' Web Sites, 1998-2000. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
16. Ha, L. (2003). Crossing Offline and Online Media: A Comparison of Online Advertising on TV Web Sites and Online Portals. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3.
17. Herrnson, P. S., & Stokes, A. K. (2003, April). Politics and the Digital Divide: District Characteristics and Candidate Internet Use in State Legislative Campaigns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
18. Herrnson, P. S., Lay, J. C., & Stokes, A. K. (2003). Women Running "as Women": Candidate Gender, Campaign issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies. The Journal of Politics, 65, 244-255.
19. Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119-147.
20. Iyengar, S., Valentino, N. A., Ansolabehere, S., & Simon, A. F. (1997). Running as a Woman: Gender Stereotyping in Political Campaigns. In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, Media and Politics (pp. 77-98). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Johnston, A., & White, A. B. (1994). Communication Styles and Female Candidates: A Study of the Political Advertising During the 1986 Senate Elections. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 321-329.
22. Joslyn, R. (1986). Political Advertising and the Meaning of Elections. In L. L. Kaid, D. Nimmo, & K. Sanders (Eds.), New Perspectives on Political Advertising (pp. 139-183). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
23. Kahn, K. F. (1993). Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for U.S. Senate. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 481-502.
24. Kahn, K. F. (1994). Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 162-195.
25. Kahn, K. F. (1996). The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia University Press.
26. Kahn, K. F., & Goldenberg, E. N. (1991). Women Candidates in the News: An Examination of Gender Differences in U.S. Senate Campaign Coverage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 180-199.
27. Kahn, K. F., & Gordon, A. (1997). How Women Campaign for the U.S. Senate: Substance and Strategy. In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, Media and Politics (pp. 59-75). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Kamarck, E. C. (1999). Campaigning on the Internet in the Elections of 1998. In E.C. Kamarck & J. Nye (Eds.), Democracy.com? Governance in a Networked World (pp. 99-123). Hollis, NJ: Hollis Publishing Company.
29. Kern, M., & Edley, P. P. (1994). Women Candidates Going Public: The 30-Second Format', Argumentation and Advocacy, 31, 80-95.
30. Klotz, R. (1998). Virtual Criticism: Negative Advertising on the Internet in the 1996 Senate Races. Political Communication, 75, 347-365.
31. Klotz, R., & Broome, A. (1998). Discussion of Women's Issues in the 1996 Internet Campaign. Women & Politics, 19, 67-86.
32. Lehto, A-M. (2003). "Women Promote Technology: Statements and Comments: Finland." (peeneview.almp.org.Oct. 10, 2003. (peerreview.almp. org/pdf/germany03/FinGER03.pdf)
33. Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Tu, C-C. (1997). Campaigning on the Internet: Parties and Candidates on the World Wide Web in the 1996 Primary Season. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2, 59-78.
34. Matland, R. E. (1994). Putting Scandinavian Equality to the Test: An Experimental Evaluation of Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates in a Sample of Norwegian Voters. British Journal of Political Science, 24, 273-292.
35. Millar, J., & Jagger, N. (2001). Women in ITEC Courses and Careers. London: DTI/DfES.
36. Norris, P. (2000). The Internet in Europe: A New North-South Divide?. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5, 1-12.
37. Norris, P. (2003). Preaching to the Converted? Pluralism, Participation and Party Websites. Party Politics, 9, 21-45.
38. Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 111-121.
39. Skard, T., & Haavio-Mannila, E. (1985). Women in Parliament. In E. Haavio-Mannila et al. (Eds.), Unfinished Democracy: Women in Nordic Politics (pp. 51-80). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
40. Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It. Journal of Communication, 50, 111-132.
41. van Zoonen, L. (2002). Gendering the Internet: Claims, Controversies and Cultures. European Journal of Communication, 17, 5-23.
42. Ward, S. & Gibson, R. (2003). On-line and On Message? Candidate Websites in the 2001 General Election. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 5, 188-205.
43. Wicks, R. H. & Souley, B. (2003). Going Negative: Candidate Usage of Internet Web
44. Sites During the 2000 Presidential Campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 128-144.
45. Williams, C. B., Aylesworth, A., & Chapman, K. J. (2002). The 2000 E-Campaign for U.S. Senate. Journal of Political Marketing, 1, 39-64.