What Drives Politicians' Online Popularity? An Analysis of the 2010 U.S. Midterm Elections

Journal of Information Technology and Politics

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 208-222

  Vaccari, Cristian ^a,b   Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Online campaigning; online engagement; political blogs; social media; U.S. congressional elections

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876302070     PISSN: 19331681     EISSN: 1933169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2012.758072     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abramowitz, A. 2011. The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Bennett, W. L. and Iyengar, S. 2008. A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4): 707-731.
3. Bimber, B. and Davis, R. 2003. Campaigning online: The Internet in U.S. elections, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Cogburn, D. and Espinoza-Vasquez, F. 2011. From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1-2): 189-213.
5. Druckman, J., Kifer, M. and Parkin, M. 2007. The technological development of congressional candidate Web sites: How and why candidates use Web innovations. Social Science Computer Review, 25: 425-442.
6. Duverger, M. 1954. Political parties, London: Methuen.
7. Esterling, K., Lazer, D. and Neblo, M. 2011. Representative communication: Web site interactivity and distributional path dependence in the U.S. Congress. Political Communication, 28(4): 409-439.
8. Foot, K. A. and Schneider, S. M. 2006. Web campaigning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Gibson, R. K. and McAllister, I. 2011. Do online election campaigns win votes? The 2007 Australian "YouTube" election. Political Communication, 28(2): 227-244.
10. Gonzalez-Bailon, S. 2009. Opening the black box of link formation: Social factors underlying the structure of the Web. Social Networks, 31(4): 271-280.
11. Gulati, G. and Williams, C. 2008, August. What is a social network worth? Facebook and vote share in the 2008 Presidential primaries, Boston, Massachussetts: Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting.
12. Gulati, G. and Williams, C. 2010a. Congressional candidates' use of YouTube in 2008: Its frequency and rationale. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(2-3): 93-109.
13. Gulati, G., & Williams, C. (2010b). Communicating with constituents in 140 characters or less: Twitter and the diffusion of technology innovation in the United States Congress. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1628247 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1628247)
14. Gulati, G., & Williams, C. (2011). Social media in the 2010 Congressional elections. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1817053 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1817053)
15. Haynes, A. and Pitts, B. 2009. Making an impression: New media in the 2008 Presidential nomination campaigns. P.S. Political Science and Politics, 42(1): 53-58.
16. Herrnson, P. S., Stokes-Brown, A. K. and Hindman, M. 2007. Campaign politics and the digital divide: Constituency characteristics, strategic considerations, and candidate Internet use in state legislative elections. Political Research Quarterly, 60(1): 31-42.
17. Hibbing, J. R. and Theiss-Morse, E. 2002. Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Howard, P. N. 2006. New media campaigns and the managed citizen, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Jacobson, G. 2009. The politics of Congressional elections, 7th, New York: Pearson/Longman.
20. Karpf, D. 2012. The MoveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21. Keen, J. (2006, October 17). Politicians' campaigns invade MySpace. USA Today http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2006-10-16-politicians-social-sites_x.htm (http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2006-10-16-politicians-social-sites_x.htm)
22. Kohut, A., Doherty, C., Dimock, M. and Keeter, S. 2011. Internet gains on television as public's main news source, Washington, DC: Pew Center for the People and the Press.
23. Kreiss, D. 2012. Taking our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24. Margolis, M. and Resnick, D. 2000. Politics as usual: The cyberspace "revolution.", Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Margolis, M., Resnick, D. and Levy, J. 2003. "Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle". In Political parties and the Internet: Net gain?, Edited by: Gibson, R. K., Nixon, P. and Ward, S. 53-69. London: Routledge.
26. Nahon, K., Hemsley, J., Walker, S. and Hussain, M. 2011. Fifteen minutes of fame: The power of blogs in the lifecycle of viral political information. Policy & Internet, 3(1): 1-28.
27. Nielsen, R. K. 2011. Mundane Internet tools, mobilizing practices, and the coproduction of citizenship in political campaigns. New Media & Society, 13(5): 755-771.
28. Nielsen, R. K. and Vaccari, C. 2011. Do people "like" candidates on Facebook? Not really: From direct to institutional and indirect effects of social media in politics, Seattle, Washington: Paper presented at the American Political Science Annual Meeting.
29. Prior, M. 2007. Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections, New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Sides, J., & Farrell, H. (2010). The Kos bump: The political economy of campaign fundraising in the Internet age. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1643672 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1643672)
31. Smith, A. 2011a. The Internet and campaign 2010, Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life.
32. Smith, A. 2011b. 22% of online Americans used social networking or Twitter for politics in 2010 campaign, Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life.
33. Steger, W. P., Williams, C. B., & Andolina, M. (2010). Political use of social networks in 2008. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1669535 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1669535)
34. Wallsten, K. 2010. "Yes we can": How online viewership, blog discussion, campaign statements, and mainstream media coverage produced a viral video phenomenon. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(2-3): 163-181.
35. Vaccari, C. 2013. A tale of two e-parties: Candidate websites in the 2008 U.S. Presidential primaries. Party Politics, 19(1): 19-40.
36. Xenos, M., & Pole, A. (2011). Online campaigning revisited: Candidates' use of digital media in the 2010 midterm elections. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1901869 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1901869)