Innovative technologies applied to sensorimotor rehabilitation after stroke;Technologies nouvelles appliquées àla rééducation sensori-motrice après AVC

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 543-551

  Laffont, I ^a,b   Bakhti, K ^a,b   Coroian, F ^a,b   van Dokkum, L ^a,b   Mottet, D ^b   Schweighofer, N ^b,d   Froger, J ^b,c  

^a LAPEYRONIE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTPELLIER   (France)

^c NÎMES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain stimulation; New technologies; Rehabilitation; Robotics; Stroke; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NEUROFEEDBACK; NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; REHABILITATION CARE; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SHORT SURVEY; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; VIRTUAL REALITY; BRAIN; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; INVENTION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROREHABILITATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; STROKE; TRENDS; UPPER LIMB;

BRAIN; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HUMANS; INVENTIONS; NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84911926187     PISSN: 18770657     EISSN: 18770665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.007     Document Type: Short Survey

References (36)

1. Langhorne P., Bernhardt J., Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011, 377:1693-1702.
2. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 11:CD000197.
3. Sunnerhagen K.S., Danielsson A., Rafsten L., Björkdahl A., Axelsson ÅB, Nordin Å., et al. Gothenburg very early supported discharge study (GOTVED) NCT01622205: a block randomized trial with superiority design of very early supported discharge for patients with stroke. BMC Neurol 2013, 13:66.
4. Johansson T., Wild C. Telerehabilitation in stroke care-a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2011, 17:1-6.
5. Rubin M.N., Wellik K.E., Channer D.D., Demaerschalk B.M. Systematic review of telestroke for post-stroke care and rehabilitation. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2013, 15:343.
6. Jones F., Riazi A. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2011, 33:797-810.
7. Reinkensmeyer D.J., Boninger M.L. Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012, 9:17.
8. Kitago T., Krakauer J.W. Motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol 2013, 110:93-103.
9. Nudo R.J., McNeal D. Plasticity of cerebral functions. Handb Clin Neurol 2013, 110:13-21.
10. Pekna M., Pekny M., Nilsson M. Modulation of neural plasticity as a basis for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2012, 43:2819-2828.
11. Schuhfried O., Crevenna R., Fialka-Moser V., Paternostro-Sluga T. Non-invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with central nervous system lesions: an educational review. J Rehabil Med 2012, 44:99-105.
12. Hara Y. Neurorehabilitation with new functional electrical stimulation for hemiparetic upper extremity in stroke patients. J Nippon Med Sch 2008, 75:4-14.
13. Everaert D.G., Stein R.B., Abrams G.M., Dromerick A.W., Francisco G.E., Hafner B.J., et al. Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013, 27:579-591.
14. Mehrholz J., Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted gait training after stroke: a systematic review comparing end-effector and exoskeleton devices. J Rehabil Med 2012, 44:193-199.
15. Krebs H.I., Hogan N. Robotic therapy: the tipping point. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 91:S290-S297.
16. Hammami N., Coroian F.O., Julia M., Amri M., Mottet D., Hérisson C., et al. Isokinetic muscle strengthening after acquired cerebral damage: a literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2012, 55:279-291.
17. Mehrholz J., Hädrich A., Platz T., Kugler J., Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 6:CD006876.
18. Schweighofer N., Choi Y., Winstein C., Gordon J. Task-oriented rehabilitation robotics. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012, 91:S270-S279.
19. Mehrholz J., Elsner B., Werner C., Kugler J., Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 7:CD006185.
20. Forrester L.W., Roy A., Goodman R.N., Rietschel J., Barton J.E., Krebs H.I., et al. Clinical application of a modular ankle robot for stroke rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 2013, 33:85-97.
21. Laver K., George S., Thomas S., Deutsch J.E., Crotty M. Cochrane review: virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2012, 48:523-530.
22. Moreira M.C., de Amorim Lima A.M., Ferraz K.M., Benedetti Rodrigues M.A. Use of virtual reality in gait recovery among post stroke patients-a systematic literature review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2013, 8:357-362.
23. Nirme J., Duff A., Verschure P.F. Adaptive rehabilitation gaming system: on-line individualization of stroke rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011, 2011:6749-6752.
24. Schweighofer N., Han C.E., Wolf S.L., Arbib M.A., Winstein C.J. A functional threshold for long-term use of hand and arm function can be determined: predictions from a computational model and supporting data from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial. Phys Ther 2009, 89:1327-1336.
25. Stanton R., Ada L., Dean C.M., Preston E. Biofeedback improves activities of the lower limb after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother 2011, 57:145-155.
26. Laufer Y., Elboim-Gabyzon M. Does sensory transcutaneous electrical stimulation enhance motor recovery following a stroke? A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011, 25:799-809.
27. Garrison K.A., Aziz-Zadeh L., Wong S.W., Liew S.L., Winstein C.J. Modulating the motor system by action observation after stroke. Stroke 2013, 44:2247-2253.
28. Abdollahi F., Case Lazarro E.D., Listenberger M., Kenyon R.V., Kovic M., Bogey R.A., et al. Error augmentation enhancing arm recovery in individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized crossover design. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014, 28:120-128. 10.1177/1545968313498649.
29. Molier B.I., Van Asseldonk E.H., Hermens H.J., Jannink M.J. Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2010, 32:1799-1809.
30. Daly J.J., Wolpaw J.R. Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2008, 7:1032-1043.
31. Mihara M., Hattori N., Hatakenaka M., Yagura H., Kawano T., Hino T., et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy-mediated neurofeedback enhances efficacy of motor imagery-based training in poststroke victims: a pilot study. Stroke 2013, 44:1091-1098.
32. Feng W.W., Bowden M.G., Kautz S. Review of transcranial direct current stimulation in poststroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2013, 20:68-77.
33. Ayache S.S., Farhat W.H., Zouari H.G., Hosseini H., Mylius V., Lefaucheur J.P. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: motor deficit. Expert Rev Neurother 2012, 12:949-972.
34. Edwardson M.A., Lucas T.H., Carey J.R., Fetz E.E. New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Exp Brain Res 2013, 224:335-358.
35. Hao Z., Wang D., Zeng Y., Liu M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 5:CD008862.
36. Takeuchi N., Izumi S. Noninvasive brain stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and future views. Stroke Res Treat 2012, 2012:584727. 10.1155/2012/584727.