Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; Does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 22, 2010, Pages 1799-1809

  Molier, Birgit I ^a   Van Asseldonk, Edwin H F ^b   Hermens, Hermie J ^a,b   Jannink, Michiel J A ^a,b  

^a ROESSINGH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arm; feedback; motor learning; stroke

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARM; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PARESIS; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

ARM; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; PARESIS; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 77956897746     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638281003734359     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. American Heart Association. Web Page. http://www.american heart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3018163. Last accessed November 2007.
2. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003;34:2181-2186.
3. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:823-830.
4. Schaechter JD. Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Prog Neurobiol 2004;73:61-72.
5. Hodics T, Cohen LG, Cramer SC Functional imaging of intervention effects in stroke motor rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87(12 Suppl 2):S36-S42.
6. Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N., Anders S, Cohen LG Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain 2003;126 (Part 4):866-872.
7. Kaelin-Lang A., Sawaki L, Cohen LG Role of voluntary drive in encoding an elementary motor memory. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:1099-1103.
8. Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, Bohannon R. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17:220-226.
9. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:187-211; discussion 212-219.
10. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens H.J., Ijzerman MJ Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:171-184.
11. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-121.
12. Kahn LE, Lum PS, Rymer W.Z., Reinkensmeyer DJ Robotassisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: does it matter what the robot does? J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43: 619-630.
13. Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:52-61.
14. Crosbie JH, Lennon S, Basford J.R., McDonough SM Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1139-1146; discussion 1147-1152.
15. Schmidt RA, Lee TD Motor control and Learning, a behavioral emphasis. 4th ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign. 2005.
16. van Vliet P.M., Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28: 831-840.
17. Woodford H, Price C. EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD004585.
18. Jovell AJ, Navarro-Rubio MD. [Evaluation of scientific evidence]?. Med Clin (Barc) 1995;105:740-743.
19. Jack D, Boian R, Merians A.S., Tremaine M., Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, Recce M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2001;9:308-318.
20. Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R., Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich S.V., Recce M., Poizner H. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther 2002;82:898-915.
21. Deutsch JE, Merians AS, Adamovich S, Poizner H., Burdea GC Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:371-386.
22. Merians AS, Poizner H, Boian R., Burdea G, Adamovich S. Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: does it improve functional recovery poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006;20:252-267.
23. Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, Cho Y.W., Park CM, Cho SH, Lee HY, Kim TH Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2218-2223. (Pubitemid 41566224)
24. Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 2006;37: 1237-1242.
25. Fischer HC, Stubblefield K, Kline T., Luo X, Kenyon RV, Kamper DG Hand rehabilitation following stroke: a pilot study of assisted finger extension training in a virtual environment. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:1-12.
26. Carey JR, Durfee WK, Bhatt E, Nagpal A., Weinstein SA, Anderson KM, Lewis SM Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:216-232.
27. Cirstea MC, Levin MF Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:398-411.
28. Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W., Stokes E. The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:395-405.
29. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ A Randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:505-514.
30. Eckhouse RH J.r., Morash RP, Maulucci RA Sensory feedback and the impaired motor system. J Med Syst 1990;14:93-105.
31. Winstein CJ, Merians AS, Sullivan KJ Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 1999;37:975-987.
32. Maulucci RA, Eckhouse RH Retraining reaching in chronic stroke with real-time auditory feedback. NeuroRehabilitation 2001;16:171-182.
33. Broeren J, Claesson L, Goude D., Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community-dwelling persons with stroke. The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26: 289-296.
34. Bourbonnais D, Bilodeau S, Lepage Y., Beaudoin N, Gravel D, Forget R. Effect of force-feedback treatments in patients with chronic motor deficits after a stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:890-897.
35. Ellis MD, Holubar BG, Acosta A.M., Beer RF, Dewald JP Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke. Muscle Nerve 2005;32: 170-178.
36. Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S., Shah P, Smith R, Rahman T., Cramer SC, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006; 14:378-389.
37. Stewart JC, Yeh SC, Jung Y, Yoon H., Whitford M, Chen SY, Li L, McLaughlin M., Rizzo A, Winstein CJ Intervention to enhance skilled arm and hand movements after stroke: a feasibility study using a new virtual reality system. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:21.
38. Holden MK, Dyar TA, Dayan-Cimadoro L. Telerehabilita-tion using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007;15:36-42.
39. Broeren J, Rydmark M, Bjorkdahl A., Sunnerhagen KS Assessment and training in a 3-dimensional virtual environment with haptics: a report on 5 cases of motor rehabilitation in the chronic stage after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:180-189.
40. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S., Mazzone A, Delconte C, Carrozza M.C., Dario P., Minuco G. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:50-63.
41. Casadio M, Giannoni P, Morasso P., Sanguineti V. A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:217-228.
42. Piron L, Tonin P, Trivello E., Battistin L, Dam M. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Med Inform Internet Med 2004;29:119-125.
43. Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1247-1250.
44. Van Peppen R.P., Hendriks HJM, Van Meeteren NLU, Helders PJM, Kwakkel G. The development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in The Netherlands: a systematic review of available evidence. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:767-783.
45. Schmidt RA, Wulf G. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: implications for training and simulation. Hum Factors 1997;39:509-525.
46. Winstein C, Schmidt R. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990;16:677-691.
47. Wulf G, Schmidt RA, Deubel H. Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1993;19:1134-1150.
48. Wulf G, Schmidt R. The learning of generalized motor programs: reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1989;15:748-757.