Robotic therapy: The tipping point

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 91, Issue 11 SUPPL.3, 2012, Pages

  Krebs, Herman Igo ^a,c   Hogan, Neville ^a,b  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Assistive Technology; Robotic Therapy

Indexed keywords

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COST CONTROL; DISABLED PERSON; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SELF HELP;

COST CONTROL; DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; ROBOTICS; SELF-HELP DEVICES; STROKE;

EID: 84871877378     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: 15377385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826bcd80     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Christensen CM, Suárez FF, Utterback JM: Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries, Wp. Cambridge, MA, International Center for Research on the Management of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996, pp. 33
2. Christensen CM: The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, The Management of Innovation and Change Series Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press, 1997, pp. xxiv
3. Gladwell M: The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, ed 1. Boston, MA, Little, Brown, 2000, pp. viii
4. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, et al: Robot-aided neu-rorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998;6:75-87
5. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, et al: The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997; 54:443-6
6. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI: Effects of robotassisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-21
7. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, et al, Nursing American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular, and Council the Stroke: Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010;41: 2402-48
8. Group Management of Stroke Rehabilitation Working: Va/Dod clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010;47:1-43
9. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al: Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1772-83
10. Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al: Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1692-8
11. Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, et al: Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:305-10
12. Dobkin BH: Progressive staging of pilot studies to improve phase iii trials for motor interventions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23:197-206
13. Wagner TH, Lo AC, Peduzzi P, et al: An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Stroke 2011;42:2630-2
14. Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, et al: Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study. Stroke 2008;39:1786-92
15. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, et al: Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:5-13
16. Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL, et al: Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2026-36
17. Dobkin BH, Duncan PW: Should body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26: 308-17