Clinical application of a modular ankle robot for stroke rehabilitation

NeuroRehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 85-97

  Forrester, Larry W ^a,b   Roy, Anindo ^a,b,c   Goodman, Ronald N ^a,b   Rietschel, Jeremy ^a,b   Barton, Joseph E ^a,b   Krebs, Hermano Igo ^b,d   Macko, Richard F ^a,b,e  

^a VA RRandD Maryland Exercise   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

^e BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

hemiparetic gait; lower extremity robotics; motor learning; rehabilitation robotics; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ANKLE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC PATIENT; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; GAIT; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; LOCOMOTION; MOTOR CONTROL; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PILOT STUDY; ROBOTICS; TRAINING; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ANKLE; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 84883883235     PISSN: 10538135     EISSN: 18786448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130931     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Barbeau, H., & Visintin, M. (2003). Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(10), 1458-1465.
2. Bowden, M. G., Balasubramanian, C. K., Neptune, R. R., &Kautz, S. A. (2006). Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke, 37(3), 872-876.
3. Boyce, B. A., Coker, C. A., & Bunker, L. K. (2006). Implications for variability of practice from pedagogy and motor learning perspectives: Finding a common ground. Quest, 58(3), 330-343.
4. Burgar, C. G., Lum, P. S., Scremin, A. M., Garber, S. L., Van der Loos, H. L., Kenney, D., &Shor, P. (2011). Robot-assisted upperlimb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 48, 445-458.
5. Colombo, G., Joerg, M., Schreier, R., & Dietz, V. (2000). Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6), 693-700.
6. Colombo, G., Joerg, M., Schreier, R., & Dietz, V. (2000). Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6), 693-700.
7. De Vico Fallani, F., Astolfi, L., Cincotti, F., Mattia, D., la Rocca, D., Maksuti, E., & Nagy, Z.(2009). Evaluation of the brain network organization from EEG signals: A preliminary evidence in stroke patient. The Anatomical Record, 292(12), 2023-2031.
8. Dennis, M. S., Lo, K. M., McDowall, M., &West, T. (2002). Fractures after stroke: Frequency, types, and associations. Stroke, 33(3), 728-734.
9. Duncan, P.W., Sullivan, K. J., Behrman, A. L., Azen, S. P., Wu, S. S., Nadeau, S. E., & Hayden, S. K.(2011). Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(21), 2026-2036.
10. Engelmann, J. B., & Pessoa, L. (2007). Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention. Emotion, 7(3), 668-674.
11. Forrester, L. W., Roy, A., Krebs, H. I., & Macko, R. F. (2011). Performance-based ankle robotics training improves hemiparetic gait after stroke: A preliminary report. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 369-377.
12. Forrester, L., Roy, A., Krywonis, A., Krebs, H. I., &Macko, R. (2012). Poster 90 feasibility for using ankle robotics in the acute phase of stroke: A controlled pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(10), e40.
13. Forster, A., & Young, J. (1995). Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: A systematic inquiry. British Medical Journal, 311(6997), 83-86.
14. Goodman, R. N., Forrester, L., Macko, R., &Roy, A. (2012). Poster 29 cortical and biomechanical dynamics of lower extremity robotics training at different levels of motivational incentive. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(10), e22.
15. Gordon, D., Robertson, E., & Winter, D. A. (1980). Mechanical energy generation, absorption and transfer amongst segments during walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 13(10), 845-854.
16. Grillner, S. (1975). Locomotion in vertebrates: Central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiological Reviews, 55(2), 247-304.
17. Grillner, S., &Wallen, P. (1985). Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 8(1), 233-261.
18. Halsband, U., & Lange, R. K. (2006). Motor learning in man: A review of functional and clinical studies. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 99(4-6), 414-424.
19. Hassid, E., Rose, D., Commisarow, J., Guttry, M., & Dobkin, B. H. (1997). Improved gait symmetry in hemiparetic stroke patients induced during body weight-supported treadmill stepping. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 11(1), 21-26.
20. Hatfield, B. D., Haufler, A. J., Hung, T. M., &Spalding, T.W. (2004). Electroencephalographic studies of skilled psychomotor performance. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 21(3), 144-156.
21. Hesse, S., & Uhlenbrock, D. (2000). A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6), 701-708.
22. Hesse, S., Bertelt, C., Jahnke, M. T., Schaffrin, A., Baake, P., Malezic, M., &Mauritz, K. H. (1995). Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke, 26(6), 976-981.
23. Hesse, S., Bertelt, C., Schaffrin, A., Malezic, M., & Mauritz, K. H. (1994). Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(10), 1087.
24. Hornby, T. G., Campbell, D. D., Kahn, J. H., Demott, T., Moore, J. L., & Roth, H. R. (2008). Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke:Arandomized controlled study. Stroke, 39(6), 1786-1792.
25. Hosp, J. A., Pekanovic, A., Rioult-Pedotti, M.S., &Luft, A. R. (2011). Dopaminergic projections from midbrain to primary motor cortex mediate motor skill learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(7), 2481-2487.
26. Ichinose, W. E., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Aoyagi, D., Lin, J. T., Ngai, K., Edgerton, V. R., & Bobrow, J. E. (2003). A robotic device for measuring and controlling pelvic motion during locomotor rehabilitation. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2003. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (Vol. 2, pp. 1690-1693). IEEE.
27. Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1), 35-45.
28. Kanis, J., Oden, A., & Johnell, O. (2001). Acute and long-term increase in fracture risk after hospitalization for stroke. Stroke, 32(3), 702-706.
29. Kawato, M., &Wolpert, D. (1998). Internal models for motor control. Sensory Guidance of Movement, 218, 291-307.
30. Khanna, I., Roy, A., Rodgers, M. M., Krebs, H. I., Macko, R. M., & Forrester, L.W. (2010). Effects of unilateral robotic limb loading on gait characteristics in subjects with chronic stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 7(1), 1-8.
31. Krakauer, J.W. (2006). Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Current Opinion in Neurology, 19(1), 84-90.
32. Krebs, H. I., Hogan, N., Aisen, M. L., & Volpe, B. T. (1998). Robotaided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 6(1), 75-87.
33. Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., Lynch, D., & Hogan, N. (2005). Stroke rehabilitation: An argument in favor of a robotic gym. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (USA), Chicago, USA, pp. 219-222.
34. Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., Williams, D., Celestino, J., Charles, S. K., Lynch, D., &Hogan, N. (2007). Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: A robot for wrist rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 15(3), 327-335.
35. LeDoux, J.E. (2003). Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. Penguin.
36. Ljung, L. (1999). System Identification. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
37. Lo, A. C., Guarino, P. D., Richards, L. G., Haselkorn, J. K., Wittenberg, G. F., Federman, D. G., &Peduzzi, P. (2010). Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(19), 1772-1783.
38. Luft, A. R., Macko, R. F., Forrester, L. W., Villagra, F., Ivey, F., Sorkin, J. D., &Hanley, D. F. (2008). Treadmill exercise activates subcortical neural networks and improves walking after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 39(12), 3341-3350.
39. Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Kenney, D. E., & Van der Loos, H. F. (1999). Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46(6), 652-662.
40. Lutz, A., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., &Varela, F. J. (2002). Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(3), 1586-1591.
41. Macko, R. F., Ivey, F. M., Forrester, L. W., Hanley, D., Sorkin, J. D., Katzel, L. I., & Goldberg, A. P. (2005). Treadmill exercise rehabilitation improves ambulatory function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized, controlled trial. Stroke, 36(10), 2206-2211.
42. Mattia, D., Spanedda, F., Babiloni, F., Romigi, A., & Marciani, M. G. (2003). Quantitative EEG patterns following unilateral stroke: A study in chronic stage. International Journal of Neuroscience, 113(4), 465-482.
43. Mehrholz, J., Werner, C., Kugler, J., & Pohl, M. (2007). Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Sys Rev, (4), CD006185. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub2
44. Mima, T., Toma, K., Koshy, B., & Hallett, M. (2001). Coherence between cortical and muscular activities after subcortical stroke. Stroke, 32(11), 2597-2601.
45. Mirelman, A., Bonato, P., & Deutsch, J. E. (2009). Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke, 40(1), 169-174.
46. Nashner, L. M. (1977). Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance. Experimental Brain Research, 30(1), 13-24.
47. Nolfe, G., Cobianchi, A., Mossuto-Agatiello, L., & Giaquinto, S. (2006). The role of P300 in the recovery of post-stroke global aphasia. European Journal of Neurology, 13(4), 377-384.
48. Olney, S. J., Griffin, M. P., Monga, T. N., & McBride, I. D. (1991). Work and power in gait of stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72(5), 309.
49. Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160-166.
50. Ramnemark, A., Nyberg, L., Borssen, B., Olsson, T., &Gustafson, Y. (1998). Fractures after stroke. Osteoporosis International, 8(1), 92-95.
51. Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Dewald, J. P., & Rymer, W. Z. (1999). Guidance-based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: A pilot study. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 7(1), 1-11.
52. Reisman, D. S., Wityk, R., Silver, K., & Bastian, A. J. (2007). Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke. Brain, 130(7), 1861-1872.
53. Reisman, D. S., Wityk, R., Silver, K., & Bastian, A. J. (2009). Split-belt treadmill adaptation transfers to overground walking in persons poststroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23(7), 735-744.
54. Rijntjes, M. (2006). Mechanisms of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis or aphasia: Newinsights, old questions and the meaning of therapies. Current Opinion in Neurology, 19(1), 76-83.
55. Roy, A., Forrester, L. W., & Macko, R. F. (2011). Short-term ankle motor learning with ankle robotics training in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 48(4), 417-429.
56. Roy, A., Forrester, L.W., Macko, R. F., &Krebs, H. I. (2013). Changes in passive ankle stiffness and its effects on gait function in people with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev, 50(4), XX-XX. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0206
57. Roy, A., Krebs, H. I., Barton, J. E., Macko, R. F., & Forrester, L. W. (2013). Anklebot-assisted locomotor training after stroke: A novel deficit-adjusted approach. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Karlsruhe, Germany, 2167- 2174.
58. Roy, A., Krebs, H. I., Bever, C. T., Forrester, L. W., Macko, R. F., & Hogan, N. (2011). Measurement of passive ankle stiffness in subjects with chronic hemiparesis using a novel ankle robot. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105(5), 2132-2149.
59. Roy, A., Krebs, H. I., Williams, D. J., Bever, C. T., Forrester, L. W., Macko, R. M., & Hogan, N. (2009). Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: A novel robot for ankle rehabilitation. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, 25(3), 569-582.
60. Salomons, T. V., Johnstone, T., Backonja, M. M., & Davidson, R. J. (2004). Perceived controllability modulates the neural response to pain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(32), 7199-7203.
61. Schmidt, H., Sorowka, D., Hesse, S., & Bernhardt, R. (2003). Development of a robotic walking simulator for gait rehabilitation. Biomedizinische Technik, 48(10), 281-286.
62. Schmidt, H., Werner, C., Bernhardt, R., Hesse, S., &Krüger, J. (2007). Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 4(1), 2.
63. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Human Kinetics Publishers.
64. Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Waugh, C. E., Stanton, S. J., Meier, E. A., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2008). Exploring the motivational brain: Effects of implicit power motivation on brain activation in response to facial expressions of emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(4), 333-343.
65. Shadmehr, R., &Wise, S. P. (2005). The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing: A Foundation for Motor Learning. The MIT press.
66. Small, D. M., Gitelman, D., Simmons, K., Bloise, S. M., Parrish, T., & Mesulam, M. M. (2005). Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-downcontrol of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 15(12), 1855-1865.
67. Strens, L. H. A., Asselman, P., Pogosyan, A., Loukas, C., Thompson, A. J., & Brown, P. (2004). Corticocortical coupling in chronic stroke Its relevance to recovery. Neurology, 63(3), 475-484.
68. Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Sport and Physical Activity: A Review and a Look at the Future. Handbook of Sport Psychology, Third Edition, 59-83. 62.
69. Westlake, K. P., & Patten, C. (2009). Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery poststroke. J NeuroEng Rehabil, 6, 18. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-18.