The testing effect

The SAGE Handbook of Applied Memory

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 183-200

  McDermott, Kathleen B ^a   Arnold, Kathleen M ^b   Nelson, Steven M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911809390     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446294703.n11     Document Type: Chapter

References (102)

1. Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 463-470. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80090-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2869%2980090-3
2. Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 415-445. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006
3. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R.A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1063-1087. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
4. Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999). Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 608-629. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.608
5. Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013a). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 940-945. doi:10.1037/a0029199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029199
6. Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013b). Test-potentiated learning in free recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 507-513. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0370-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0370-3
7. Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (in preparation). Does metacognition contribute to test-potentiated learning?
8. Bacon, F. (2000). Novum organum (L. J. M.Silverthorne, Trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Original work published in 1620).
9. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 89-99. doi:10.1080/00220671.1991.10702818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1991.10702818
10. Bartlett, J. C. (1977). Effects of immediate testing on delayed retrieval: Search and recovery operations with four types of cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 719-732. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.6.719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.3.6.719
11. Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & MacLeod, M. D. (2006). Types and consequences of forgetting: intended and unintended. In L.-G.Nilsson and N.Ohta (Eds), Memory and society: Psychological perspectives (pp. 134-158). New York: Routledge and Psychology Press.
12. Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and realted phenomenon. In R. L.Solso (Ed), Information processing and cognition (pp. 123-144). New York: John Wiley.
13. Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M.Gruneberg, P. E.Morris, and R. N.Sykes (Eds), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 396-401). New York: Wiley.
14. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J.Metcalfe and A.Shimamura (Eds), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. F.Healy, S.Kosslyn and R.Shiffrin (Eds), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118-1133. doi:10.1037/a0019902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019902
17. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 13, 273-281. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273
18. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 918-928. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918
19. Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 604-616. doi:10.3758/MC.36.3.604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.604
20. Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1563-1569. doi:10.1037/a0017021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017021
21. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268-276. doi:10.3758/BF03193405 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193405
22. Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students’ retention of U.S. history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 760-771. doi:10.1002/acp.1507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1507
23. Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438-448. doi:10.3758/MC.36.2.438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.438
24. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642. doi:10.3758/BF03202713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03202713
25. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
26. Chan, J. C. K. (2009). When does retrieval induce forgetting and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 153-170. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.004
27. Chan, J. C. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2006). Retrieval-induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 553-571. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.553
28. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
29. Donaldson, W. (1971). Output effects in multitrial free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 577-585. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80031-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2871%2980031-2
30. Duchastel, P. C., & Nungester, R. J. (1982). Testing effects measured with alternate test forms. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 309-313.
31. Estes, W. K. (1955a). Statistical theory of distributed phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62, 369-377. doi:10.1037/h0046888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046888
32. Estes, W. K. (1955b). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154. doi:10.1037/h0048509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0048509
33. Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2010). Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction. Memory & Cognition, 38, 951-961. doi:10.3758/MC.38.7.951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.7.951
34. Gardiner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., & Bleasdale, F. A. (1973). Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Memory & Cognition, 1, 213-216. doi:10.3758/BF03198098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03198098
35. Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6.
36. Glover, J. A. (1989). The ’testing’ phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-399. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.392
37. Greene, R. L. (1989). Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a two-process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 371-377. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.371
38. Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012). When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory & Cognition, 40, 505-513. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0
39. Halamish, V., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 801-812. doi:10.1037/a0023219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023219
40. Hays, M. J., Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2010). The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 797-801. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.797
41. Hays, M. J., Kornell, N., & Bjork, E. L. (2012). When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(1), 290-296. doi:10.1037/a0028468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028468
42. Hintzman, D. L. (2004). Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding. Memory & Cognition, 32, 336-350. doi:10.3758/BF03196863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196863
43. Hintzman, D. L. (2011). Research strategy in the study of memory: Fads, fallacies, and the search for the ’oordinates of truth’. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 253-271. doi:10.1177/1745691611406924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406924
44. Huelser, B. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2012). Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it. Memory & Cognition, 40, 514-527. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0167-z http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0167-z
45. Izawa, C. (1966). Reinforcement-test sequences in paired-associate learning. Psychological Reports, 18, 879-919. doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.879 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.879
46. Izawa, C. (1967). Function of test trials in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 194-209. doi:10.1037/h0024971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0024971
47. Izawa, C. (1968). Effects of reinforcement, neutral and test trials upon paired-associate acquisition and retention. Psychological Reports, 23, 947-959. doi:10.2466/pr0.1968.23.3.947 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1968.23.3.947
48. Izawa, C. (1969). Comparison of reinforcement and test trials in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(3), 600-603. doi:10.1037/h0027905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0027905
49. Izawa, C. (1970). Optimal potentiating effects and forgetting-prevention effects of tests in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 340-344. doi:10.1037/h0028541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028541
50. Izawa, C. (1971). Massed and spaced practice in paired-associate learning: List versus item distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 10-21. doi:10.1037/h0031177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0031177
51. Kang, S. H. K., McDaniel, M. A., & Pashler, H. (2011). Effects of testing on learning of functions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 988-1005.
52. Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528-558. doi:10.1080/09541440601056620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440601056620
53. Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 469-486. doi:10.1037/a0017341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017341
54. Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772-775. doi:10.1126/science.1199327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
55. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007a). Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 704-719. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704
56. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007b). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151-162. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004
57. Katzaroff, D. (1908). Rôle de la récitation comme facteur de la mémorisation. Archives de Psychologie, 7, 224-259.
58. Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 989-998. doi:10.1037/a0015729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015729
59. Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17, 493-501. doi:10.1080/09658210902832915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658210902832915
60. Kul ik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97. doi:10.3102/00346543058001079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001079
61. Lac hman, R., & Laughery, K. R. (1968). Is a test trial a training trial in free recall learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 40-50. doi:10.1037/h0025278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025278
62. LaPorte, R. E., & Voss, J. F. (1975). Retention of prose materials as a function of postacquisition testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 259-266. doi:10.1037/h0076933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076933
63. Mac Leod, M. D., & Macrae, C. N. (2001). Gone but not forgotten: The transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 12, 148-152. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00325
64. Mar sh, E. J., Roediger, H. L., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2007). The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 194-199. doi:10.3758/BF03194051 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194051
65. McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 399-414. doi:10.1037/a0021782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021782
66. McD aniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 494-513. doi:10.1080/09541440701326154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326154
67. McD aniel, M. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 371-385. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.371
68. McDaniel, M. A., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2007). Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 200-206. doi:10.3758/BF03194052 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194052
69. McD aniel, M. A., Wildman, K. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2012). Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: An experimental study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 18-26. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.10.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.10.001
70. McD ermott, K. B. (2006). Paradoxical effects of testing: Repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall. Memory & Cognition, 34, 261-267. doi:10.3758/BF03193404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193404
71. McDermott, K. B., Szpunar, K. K., & Christ, S. E. (2009). Laboratory-based and autobiographical retrieval tasks differ substantially in their neural substrates. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2290-2298. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.025
72. Met calfe, J., Kornell, N., & Finn, B. (2009). Delayed versus immediate feedback in children's and adults’ vocabulary learning. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1077-1087. doi:10.3758/MC.37.8.1077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.8.1077
73. Mor ris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2877%2980016-9
74. Nelson, S.M., Arnold, K.M., Gilmore, A.W., & McDermott, K.B. (2013). Neural signatures of test-potentiated learning in parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 11754-11762. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0960-13.2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0960-13.2013
75. Nelson, S. M., Cohen, A. L., Power, J. D., Wig, G. S., Miezin, F. M., Wheeler, M. E., et al. (2010). A parcelation scheme for human left lateral parietal cortex. Neuron, 67, 156-170. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.05.025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.05.025
76. Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottge, B., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M. A., et al. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning. In I. o. E. S. National Center for Education Research, US Department of Education (Ed), http://ncer.ed.gov
77. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3-8. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3
78. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437-447. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004
79. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330, 335. doi:10.1126/science.1191465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1191465
80. Richland, L. E., Kornell, N., & Kao, L. S. (2009). The pretesting effect: Do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 243-257. doi:10.1037/a0016496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016496
81. Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20-27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
82. Roediger, H. L., III, & Marsh, E. J. (2005). The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1155-1159. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1155
83. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181-210. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.127
84. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
85. Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A., McDermott, K. B., & Agarwal, P. K. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term improvements from quizzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 382-395. doi:10.1037/a0026252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026252
86. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
87. Roediger, H. L., Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55.
88. Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., & Sholar, B. (2010). Tests enhance the transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 233-239. doi:10.1037/a0017678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017678
89. Rosner, S. R. (1970). The effects of presentation and recall trials on organization in multitrial free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 69-74. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80009-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2870%2980009-3
90. Royer, J. M. (1973). Memory effects for test-like events during acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Psychological Reports, 32, 195-198. doi:10.2466/pr0.1973.32.1.195 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1973.32.1.195
91. Runquist, W. N. (1983). Some effects of remembering on forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 11, 641-650. doi:10.3758/BF03198289 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03198289
92. Slamecka, N. J., & Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 153-163. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90112-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2883%2990112-3
93. Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1988). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of prior testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 716-727. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.716
94. Sones, A. M., & Stroud, J. B. (1940). Review, with special reference to temporal position. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 665-676. doi:10.1037/h0054178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0054178
95. Spitzer, H. J. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 641-656. doi:10.1037/h0063404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063404
96. Thompson, C. P., Wenger, S. K., & Bartling, C. A. (1978). How recall facilitates subsequent recall: A reappraisal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 210-221. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.3.210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.3.210
97. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1-12. doi:10.1037/h0080017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080017
98. Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2013). Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 1-15. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0246-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0246-9
99. Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger III, H. L. (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240-245. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00036.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00036.x
100. Whitten, W. B., & Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 465-478. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80040-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2877%2980040-6
101. Young, J. L. (1971). Reinforcement-test intervals in paired-associate learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 58-81. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(71)90023-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496%2871%2990023-X
102. Zaromb, F. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2010). The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhaned organizational processes. Memory & Cognition, 38, 995-1008. doi:10.3758/MC.38.8.995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.995