Integration as a General Boundary Condition on Retrieval-Induced Forgetting

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 608-629

  Anderson, Michael C ^a   McCulloch, Kathleen C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033433390     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.608     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 463-470.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1974). Retrieval of prepositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451-474.
3. Anderson, J R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (1993, November). Strengthening is not enough: Evidence against the blocking theory of retrieval inhibition. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
5. Anderson, M. C., & Bjork, R. A. (1994). Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory: A new taxonomy. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 265-325). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063-1087.
7. Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory. Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed.; pp. 237-313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68-100.
9. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10. Basden, D. R., & Basden, B. H. (1995). Some tests of the strategy disruption interpretation of part-list cuing inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21, 1656-1669.
11. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut norms [Monograph]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 1-46.
12. Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Bjork, R. A. (1989). Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 309-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Blaxton, T. A., & Neely, J. H. (1983). Inhibition from semantically related primes: Evidence of a category-specific retrieval inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 11, 500-510.
15. Bousfield, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology, 49, 229-240.
16. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642.
17. Ciranni, M. A., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998). Retrieval-induced forgetting in episodic memory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Conway, M. A. (1996). Autobiographical memories and autobiographical knowledge. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory (pp. 67-93). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Conway, M. A. (1997). Past and present: Recovered memories and false memories. In M. A. Conway (Ed.), False and recovered memories (pp. 150-191). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20. Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Dagenbach, D., Carr, T. H., & Barnhardt, T. M. (1990). Inhibitory semantic priming of lexical decisions due to failure to retrieve weakly activated codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 328-340.
22. Gardiner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., & Bleasdale, F. A. (1973). Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Memory & Cognition, 1, 213-216.
23. Hogan, R. M., & Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 562-567.
24. Horton, D. L., & Kjeldergaard, P. M. (1961). An experimental analysis of associative factors in mediated generalization. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 75, 1-26.
25. Horton, D. L., & Wiley, R. E. (1967). The effect of mediation on the retention and strength of previously formed associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 36-41.
26. Jenkins, J. (1963). Mediated associations: Paradigms and situations. In C. N. Cofer & B. S. Musgrave (Eds.), Verbal behavior and learning: Problems and processes (pp. 210-257). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Kanungo, R. (1967). Meaning mediation in verbal transfer. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 205-212.
28. Kjeldergaard, P. M. (1968). Transfer and mediation in verbal learning. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.), Verbal behavior and general behavior theory (pp. 1071-1075). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Kroll, N. E., & Klimesch, W. (1992). Semantic memory: Complexity or connectivity? Memory & Cognition, 20, 192-210.
30. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
31. Martin, R. B., & Dean, S. J. (1964). Implicit and explicit mediation in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 21-27.
32. McCloskey, M., & Bigler, K. (1980). Focused memory search in fact retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 8, 253-264.
33. McEvoy, C. L., & Nelson, D. L. (1982). Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 581-634.
34. McGeoch, J. A. (1936). Studies in retroactive inhibition: VII. Retroactive inhibition as a function of the length and frequency of presentation of the interpolated lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 674-693.
35. Melton, A. W., & Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. The American Journal of Psychology, 3, 173-203.
36. Moeser, S. D. (1977). Recognition processes in episodic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31, 41-70.
37. Moeser, S. D. (1979a). Retrieval interference in the independent storage of related episodic traces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33, 182-192.
38. Moeser, S. D. (1979b). The role of experimental design in investigations of the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 125-134.
39. Mueller, C. W., & Watkins, M. J. (1977). Inhibition from part-set cueing: A cue-overload interpretation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 699-710.
40. Myers, J. L., O'Brien, E. J., Balota, D. A., & Toyofuku, M. L. (1984). Memory search without interference: The role of integration. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 217-242.
41. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12, 531-552.
43. Osgood, C. E. (1946). Meaningful similarity and interference in learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 277-301.
44. Osgood, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution. Psychological Review, 56, 132-143.
45. Postman, L. (1964). Studies of learning to learn: Changes in transfer as a function of practice. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 437-447.
46. Postman, L. (1971). Transfer, interference and forgetting. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth and Schlosberg's Experimental psychology (3rd ed.; pp. 1019-1132). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
47. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
48. Radvansky, G. A. (in press). Memory retrieval and suppression: The inhibition of situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
49. Radvansky, G. A., Spieler, D. H., & Zacks, R. T. (1993). Mental model organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 95-114.
50. Radvansky, G. A., Wyer, R. S., Curiel, J. M., & Lutz, M. F. (1997). Situation models and abstract ownership relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1233-1246.
51. Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 940-953.
52. Reder, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1980). A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 447-472.
53. Reder, L. M., & Ross, B. H. (1983). Integrated knowledge in different tasks: The role of retrieval strategy on fan effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 55-72.
54. Roediger, H. L. (1973). Inhibition in recall from cueing with recall targets. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 644-657.
55. Roediger, H. L. (1978). Recall as a self-limiting process. Memory & Cognition, 6, 54-63.
56. Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free-recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45-48.
57. Russell, W., & Storms, L. (1955). Implicit verbal chaining in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 287-293.
58. Rundus, D. (1973). Negative effects of using list items as recall cues. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 43-50.
59. Schooler, J. W., Fiore, S. M., & Brandimonte, M. A. (1997). At a loss for words: Verbal overshadowing of perceptual memories. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 37, 291-339.
60. Schulz, R., Liston, J., & Weaver, G. (1968). The a-b, b-c, a-c mediation paradigm: Recall of a-b following a-c learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 602-607.
61. Shaw, J. S., Bjork, R. A., & Handal, A. (1995). Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 249-253.
62. Slamecka, N. J. (1968). An examination of trace storage in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 504-513.
63. Smith, E. E., Adams, N., & Schorr, D. (1978). Fact retrieval and the paradox of interference. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 438-464.
64. Solso, R. L., & Juel, C. L. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two-through nine-letter English words. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 297-343.
65. Tulving, E. (1962). Subjective organization in free recall of unrelated words. Psychological Review, 69, 344-354.
66. Young, R. K. (1955). Retroactive and proactive effects under varying conditions of response similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 113-117.
67. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.