Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 514-527

  Huelser, Barbie J ^a   Metcalfe, Janet ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Associative learning; Errors; Generation; Memory; Metacognition

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CUES; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864440556     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0167-z     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Anderson, J. A. (1973). A theory for the recognition of items from short memorized lists. Psychological Review, 80, 417-438.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451-474.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 22, 261-295.
4. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97-123.
5. Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 237-313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1999). The fan effect: New results and new theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 186-197.
7. Barnes, J. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1959). "Fate" of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97-105.
8. Berger, S. A., Hall, L. K., & Bahrick, H. P. (1999). Stabilizing access to marginal and submarginal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 438-447.
9. Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: A metanalytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35, 201-210.
10. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Institutional impediments to effective training. In D. Druckman & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance (pp. 295-306). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & III Roediger, H. L. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 918-928.
12. Butterfield, B., & Mangels, J. A. (2003). Neural correlates of error detection and correction in a semantic retrieval task. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 793-817.
13. Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 69-84.
14. Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1563-1569.
15. Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1547-1552.
16. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268-276.
17. Carpenter, S. K., & Olson, K. M. (in press). Are pictures good for learning new vocabulary in a foreign language? Only if you think they are not. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
18. Clare, L., & Jones, R. S. P. (2008). Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impairment: A critical review. Neuropsychology Review, 1, 1-23.
19. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
20. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1972). Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension. In L. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition and learning (pp. 117-138)). New York: Wiley.
21. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
22. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 10, 268-294.
23. Cunningham, D., & Anderson, R. C. (1968). Effects of practice time within prompting and confirmation presentation procedures on paired associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 613-616.
24. Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627-661.
25. Fazio, L. K., Huelser, B. J., Johnson, A., & Marsh, E. J. (2010). Receiving right/wrong feedback: Consequences for learning. Memory, 18, 335-350.
26. Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2009). Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 88-92.
27. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
28. Glaser, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research. American Psychologist, 45, 29-39.
29. Grimadli, P. J. & Karpicke, J. D. (in press). When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory & Cognition.
30. Guthrie, E. (1952). The psychology of learning (Revth ed.). New York: Harper.
31. Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96-101.
32. Huelser, B. J. & Metcalfe, J. (2011, November). Performance monitoring offsets, but does not eliminate, the metacognitive illusion that errors hurt learning. Poster presented at the 52nd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, WA.
33. Izawa, C. (1967). Function of test trials in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 194-209.
34. Izawa, C. (1970). Optimal potentiating effects and forgetting-prevention effects of tests in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 340-344.
35. Jarvis, B. G. (2004). DirectRT (Version 2004. 1. 0. 55) [computer software]. New York: Empirisoft Corporation.
36. Kane, J. H., & Anderson, R. C. (1978). Depth of processing and interference effects in the learning and remembering of sentences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 626-635.
37. Kang, S. H. K., Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Carpenter, S. K., & Mozer, M. C. (2011). Does incorrect guessing impair fact learning? Journal of Educational Psychology., 131, 48-59.
38. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
39. Koriat, A. (2008). Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 416-428.
40. Koriat, A., & Ma'ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478-492.
41. Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 989-998.
42. Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17, 493-501.
43. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
44. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
45. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 399-414.
47. McGeoch, J. A. (1942). The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans.
48. Melton, A. W., & Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. American Journal of Psychology, 53, 173-203.
49. Metcalfe, J. (1990). Composite holographic associative recall model (CHARM) and blended memories in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 145-160.
50. Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 159-163.
51. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174-179.
52. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2007). Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors and feedback. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 225-229.
53. Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N., & Finn, B. (2009). Delayed versus immediate feedback in children's and adults' vocabulary learning. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1077-1087.
54. Miele, D. B., & Molden, D. C. (2010). Naïve theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 535-557.
55. Mulligan, N. W., & Lozito, J. P. (2005). Self-generation and memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 175-214). San Diego: Elsevier.
56. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL-effect." Psychological Science, 5, 207-213.
57. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://w3. usf. edu/FreeAssociation/.
58. Osgood, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution. Psychological Review, 56, 132-143.
59. Parlow, J., & Berlyne, D. E. (1971). The effect of prior guessing on incidental learning of verbal associations. Journal of Structural Learning, 2, 55-65.
60. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3-8.
61. Pashler, H., Zarow, G., & Triplett, B. (2003). Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1051-1057.
62. Pavio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1-25.
63. Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration-an extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition Learning, 4, 3-31.
64. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330, 335.
65. Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2002). Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 69-80.
66. Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615-625.
67. Richland, L. E., Kornell, N., & Kao, L. S. (2009). The pretesting effect: Do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 243-257.
68. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
69. Slamecka, N. J., & Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 153-163.
70. Son, L. K. (2004). Spacing one's study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 601-604.
71. Son, L. K., & Kornell, N. (2008). Research on the allocation of study time: Key studies from 1890 to the present (and beyond). In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metamemory (pp. 333-351). Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
72. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-221.
73. Soraci, S. A., Jr., Carlin, M. T., Chechile, R. A., Franks, J. J., Wills, T., & Watanabe, T. (1999). Encoding variability and cuing in generative processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 541-559.
74. Stone, N. J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 437-475.
75. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
76. Veksler, V. D., Grintsvayg, A., Lindsey, R., & Gray, W. D. (2007). A proxy for all your semantic needs. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1878). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from http://cwl-projects. cogsci. rpi. edu/msr/.
77. Webb, L. W. (1917). Transfer of training and retroaction: A comparative study. Psychological Monographs, 24, 1-90.
78. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.