Learning in repeated visual search

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1267-1282

  Hout, Michael C ^a   Goldinger, Stephen D ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME;

EID: 77957666203     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1267     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 1017-1040. doi:10.1080/13506280444000634
2. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
3. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00168
4. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 224-234. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.224
5. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331-335.
6. Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J., & Engle, R. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1042-1050.
7. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
8. de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803-1806. doi:10.1126/science.1056496
9. Endo, N., & Takeda, Y. (2004). Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 293-302.
10. Engle, R. W., Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., & Shisler, R. J. (1995). A resource account of inhibition. Psychological Science, 6, 122-125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00318.x
11. Frith, U. (1974). A curious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 113-116.
12. Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D'Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1298-1300. doi:10.1038/nn1543
13. Hollingworth, A. (2005). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 396-411. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.396
14. Hollingworth, A. (2006). Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 58-69. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.58
15. Hollingworth, A. (2007). Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 31-47. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.31
16. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 113-136. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.113
17. Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2009). Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving oculomotor behaviors: Evidence from eye movements. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Jiang, Y., & Leung, A. W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 100-106.
19. Jiang, Y., & Song, J.-H. (2005). Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: Learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1439-1448. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1439
20. Körner, C., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2007). Finding a new target in an old display: Evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 846-851.
21. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 314-328. doi:10.3758/PP.70.2.314
22. Lavie, N., & de Fockert, J. [W.] (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 669-674.
23. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339
24. Melcher, D. (2006). Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 6, 8-17. doi:10.1167/6.1.2
25. Menneer, T., Barrett, D. J. K., Phillips, L., Donnelly, N., & Cave, K. R. (2007). Costs in searching for two targets: Dividing search across target types could improve airport security screening. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 915-932. doi:10.1002/acp.1305
26. Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2009). The cost of search for multiple targets: Effects of practice and target similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 125-139. doi:10.1037/a0015331
27. Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56-60.
28. Mruczek, R. E. B., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2005). Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1016-1031.
29. Reicher, G. M., Snyder, C. R. R., & Richards, J. T. (1976). Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 522-530. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.522
30. Richards, J. T., & Reicher, G. M. (1978). The effects of background familiarity in visual search: An analysis of underlying factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 499-505.
31. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
32. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654. doi:10.1126/science.153.3736.652
33. Tatler, B. W., Gilchrist, I. D., & Land, M. F. (2005). Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: From fixations to object files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 931-960.
34. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
35. Williams, C. C. (2009, November). Encoding and visual memory: Is task always irrelevant? Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston.
36. Williams, C. C. (2010). Not all visual memories are created equal. Visual Cognition, 18, 201-228.
37. Williams, C. C., Henderson, J. M., & Zacks, R. T. (2005). Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 816-827.
38. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 693-716. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.693
39. Wolfe, J. M., Oliva, A., Butcher, S. J., & Arsenio, H. C. (2002). An unbinding problem? The disintegration of visible, previously attended objects does not attract attention. Journal of Vision, 2(3), 256-271. doi:10.1167/2.3.5
40. Wood, N. L., & Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 243-262. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.3.243