The time it takes to turn a memory into a template

Journal of Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Wilschut, Anna ^a   Theeuwes, Jan ^a   Olivers, Christian N L ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Postcueing; Time course; Visual search; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878347345     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/13.3.8     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523-547.
2. Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional templates in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(25), 9315- 9322.
3. Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A(4), 859-880.
4. Chun, M. M. (2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1407-1409.
5. Dell'Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Toffanin, P., Luria, R., & Jolicoeur, P. (2010). Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory. Neuropsychologia, 48, 419-428.
6. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
7. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433-458.
8. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10(1), 32-39.
9. Fecteau, J. H. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers. Journal of Vision, 7(6):1, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/6/1, doi:10.1167/7.6.1. [PubMed] [Article]
10. Ferber, S., Humphrey, G. K., & Vilis, T. (2005). Segregation and persistence of form in the lateral occipital cortex. Neuropsychologia, 43, 41-51.
11. Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., & van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21(5), 1053- 1069.
12. Knapp, W. H., III, & Abrams, R. A. (2012). Fundamental differences in visual search with verbal and pictorial cues. Vision Research, 71, 28- 36.
13. Kristjánsson, Á ., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5-18.
14. Los, S. A., & Schut, M. L. J. (2008). The effective time course of preparation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 20-55.
15. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of popout: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657-672.
16. Meyers, L. S., & Rhoades, R. W. (1978). Visual search of common scenes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30(2), 297-310.
17. Mortier, K., Theeuwes, J., & Starreveld, P. (2005). Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31(3), 542-557.
18. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15(2), 315-330.
19. Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631-1647.
20. Nobre, A. C., Coull, J., Maquet, P., Frith, C. D., Vandenberghe, R., & Mesulam, M. M. (2004). Orienting attention to locations in perceptual versus mental representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(3), 363-373.
21. Olivers, C. N. L. (2010). The attentional boost and the attentional blink. In J. Coull & A. C. Nobre (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 49-62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Olivers, C. N. L., & Eimer, M. (2011). On the difference between working memory and attentional set. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1553-1558.
23. Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2006). On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 1-28.
24. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220-244.
25. Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78(5), 391-408.
26. Postle, B. R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23-38.
27. Ruff, C. C., Kristjánsson, Á ., & Driver, J. (2007). Readout from iconic memory and selective spatial attention involve similar neural processes. Psychological Science, 18(10), 901-909.
28. Schmidt, J., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2011). Visual search guidance is best after a short delay. Vision Research, 51, 535-545.
29. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 74(11), 1-29.
30. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(1), 130-134.
31. Theeuwes, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2011). On the limits of top-down control of visual selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2092-2103.
32. Vickery, T. J.,King, L.-W.,&Jiang,Y. V. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5(1):8, 81-92, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/1/8, doi:10.1167/5.1.8. [PubMed] [Article]
33. Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751.
34. Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2011). The Time course of attention: Selection is transient. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e27661, doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0027661.
35. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202-238.
36. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411-1426.
37. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Palmer, E. M., Michod, K. O., & Van Wert, M. J. (2010). Getting in to guided search. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Tutorials in visual cognition (pp. 93-120). Hove, Sussex: Psychology Press.
38. Woodman, G. F., & Arita, J. T. (2011). Direct electrophysiological measurement of attentional templates in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 22(2), 212-215.
39. Woodman, G. F., Carlisle, N. B., & Reinhart, R. M. G. (2013). Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?. Journal of Vision, 13(3):1, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/13/3/1, doi:10.1167/13.3.1. [PubMed] [Article]
40. Woodman, G. F., Luck, S. J., & Schall, J. D. (2007). The role of working memory representations in the control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 17, i118-i124.