The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 314-328

  Kunar, Melina A ^a   Flusberg, Stephen ^b   Wolfe, Jeremy M ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 42949179129     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.2.314     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
2. CHUN, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
3. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
4. HICK, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
5. HILLSTROM, A., & LOGAN, G. D. (1998). Decomposing visual search: Evidence of multiple item-specific skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1385-1398.
6. HYMAN, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188-196.
7. KUNAR, M. A., FLUSBERG, S. J., HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2007). Does contextual cueing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 816-828.
8. KUNAR, M. A., FLUSBERG, S. J., & WOLFE, J. M. (2006). Contextual cuing by global features. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1204-1216.
9. KUNAR, M. A., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2006). Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: Evidence from the "top-up" procedure. Memory & Cognition, 34, 459-474.
10. KUNAR, M. A., MICHOD, K. O., & WOLFE, J. M. (2005). When we use context in contextual cueing: Evidence from multiple target locations [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 412a.
11. LOGAN, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 189-207.
12. LOGAN, G. D. (1992). Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 317-339.
13. LOGAN, G. D., TAYLOR, S. E., & ETHERTON, J. L. (1999). Attention and automaticity: Toward a theoretical integration. Psychological Research, 62, 165-181.
14. OLIVA, A., WOLFE, J., & ARSENIO, H. (2004). Panoramic search: The interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 1132-1146.
15. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10,437-442.
16. SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
17. STERNBERG, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1-32.
18. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130-134.
19. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
20. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
21. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
22. WOLFE, J. M. (1998). What do 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33-39.
23. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.
24. WOLFE, J. M., KLEMPEN, N., & DAHLEN, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Perfor mance, 26, 693-716.