The probability of improvement in fisher's geometric model: A probabilistic approach

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 99, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-6

  Ram, Yoav ^a   Hadany, Lilach ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Fitness landscape; Mathematical models; Mutations; Population genetics

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; FISHERY; FITNESS; GEOMETRY; MUTATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; PROBABILITY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PROBABILITY;

EID: 84909978978     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2014.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alfers D., Dinges H. A normal approximation for beta and gamma tail probabilities. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor. Verwandte Geb. 1984, 65:399-420.
2. Bank C., Hietpas R.T., Wong A., Bolon D.N., Jensen J.D. A Bayesian MCMC approach to assess the complete distribution of fitness effects of new mutations: uncovering the potential for adaptive walks in challenging environments. Genetics 2014, 196:1-35.
3. Blanquart F., Achaz G., Bataillon T., Tenaillon O. Properties of selected mutations and genotypic landscapes under Fisher's Geometric Model. Evolution 2014, 10.1111/evo.12545.
4. Burch C.L., Chao L. Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus ϕ6. Genetics 1999, 151:921-927.
5. Dutka J. The incomplete beta function-a historical profile. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 1981, 24:11-29.
6. Eshel I. On the survival probability of a slightly advantageous mutant gene with a general distribution of progeny size-a branching process model. J. Math. Biol. 1981, 12:355-362.
7. Fisher R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 1930, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
8. Gale J.S. Theoretical Population Genetics 1990, Unwin Hyman, London.
9. Hartl D.L., Taubes C.H. Compensatory nearly neutral mutations: selection without adaptation. J. Theoret. Biol. 1996, 182:303-309.
10. Hietpas R.T., Bank C., Jensen J.D., Bolon D.N.A. Shifting fitness landscapes in response to altered environments. Evolution 2013, 67:3512-3522.
11. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Li S. Concise formulas for the area and volume of a hyperspherical cap. Asian J. Math. Stat. 2011, 4:66-70.
13. MacLean R.C., Perron G.G., Gardner A. Diminishing returns from beneficial mutations and pervasive epistasis shape the fitness landscape for rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genetics 2010, 186:1345-1354.
14. Martin G. Fisher's geometrical model emerges as a property of complex integrated phenotypic networks. Genetics 2014, 197:237-255.
15. Martin G., Lenormand T. A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 2006, 60:893-907.
16. Martin G., Lenormand T. The distribution of beneficial and fixed mutation fitness effects close to an optimum. Genetics 2008, 179:907-916.
17. Matuszewski S., Hermisson J., Kopp M. Fisher's geometric model with a moving optimum. Evolution 2014, 68:2571-2588.
18. Melnyk A.H., Kassen R. Adaptive landscapes in evolving populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Evolution 2011, 65:3048-3059.
19. Muller M.E. A note on a method for generating points uniformly on n-dimensional spheres. Commun. ACM 1959, 2:19-20.
20. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions 2010, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert, C.W. Clark (Eds.).
21. Orr H.A. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 1998, 52:935-949.
22. Patwa Z., Wahl L.M. The fixation probability of beneficial mutations. J. R. Soc. Interface 2008, 5:1279-1289.
23. Perfeito L., Sousa A., Bataillon T., Gordo I. Rates of fitness decline and rebound suggest pervasive epistasis. Evolution 2014, 68:150-162.
24. Rice S.H. A geometric model for the evolution of development. J. Theoret. Biol. 1990, 143:319-342.
25. Sousa A., Magalhães S., Gordo I. Cost of antibiotic resistance and the geometry of adaptation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1417-1428.
26. Trindade S., Sousa A., Gordo I. Antibiotic resistance and stress in the light of Fisher's model. Evolution 2012, 66:3815-3824.
27. Venkataram, S., Sellis, D., Petrov, D.A., 2013. Ploidy and the predictability of evolution in Fisher's geometric model. bioRxiv . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/001016.
28. Waxman D. Fisher's geometrical model of evolutionary adaptation-beyond spherical geometry. J. Theoret. Biol. 2006, 241:887-895.
29. Waxman D., Welch J.J. Fisher's microscope and Haldane's ellipse. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:447-457.
30. Weinreich D.M., Knies J.L. Fisher's geometric model of adaptation meets the functional synthesis: data on pairwise epistasis for fitness yields insights into the shape and size of phenotype space. Evolution 2013, 67:2957-2972.