Impact of available nitrogen and sugar concentration in musts on alcoholic fermentation and subsequent wine spoilage by Brettanomyces bruxellensis

Food Microbiology

Volumn 46, Issue , 2015, Pages 604-609

  Childs, Bradford C ^a   Bohlscheid, Jeffri C ^b   Edwards, Charles G ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b J R SIMPLOT COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brettanomyces bruxellensis; Fermentation; Nitrogen; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sugar

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; NITROGEN;

BRETTANOMYCES; FERMENTATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VITIS; WINE;

BRETTANOMYCES; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; NITROGEN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VITIS; WINE;

EID: 84909957862     PISSN: 07400020     EISSN: 10959998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agenbach W.A. Astudy of must nitrogen content in relation to incomplete fermentations, yeast production and fermentation activity. Proceedings of the South AfricaN Society for Enology and Viticulture, Stellenbosch, South Africa 1977, 66-88. E.F. Beukman (Ed.).
2. Aguilar-Uscanga M., Delia M.L., Strehaiano P. Nutritional requirements of Brettanomyces bruxellensis: growth and physiology in batch culture and chemostat cultures. Can. J. Microbiol. 2000, 46:1046-1050.
3. Alston J.M., Fuller K.B., Lapsley J.T., Soleas G.S. Too much of a good thing? Causes and consequences of increases in sugar content of California wine grapes. J.Wine Econ. 2011, 6:135-159.
4. Barata A., Caldiera J., Botelheiro R., Pagliara D., Malfeito-Ferreira M., Loureiro V. Survival patterns of Dekkera bruxellensis in wines and inhibitory effect of sulphur dioxide. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 121:201-207.
5. Bell S.J., Henschke P.A. Implications of nitrogen nutrition for grapes, fermentation and wine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2005, 11:242-295.
6. Beltran G., Esteve-Zarzoso B., Rozès N., Mas A., Guillamón J.M. Influence of the timing of nitrogen additions during synthetic grape must fermentations on fermentation kinetics and nitrogen consumption. J.Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53:996-1002.
7. Bisson L.F., Butzke C.E. Diagnosis and rectification of stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2000, 51:168-177.
8. Blomqvist J., Nogué V.S., Gorwa-Grauslund M., Passoth V. Physiological requirements for growth and competitiveness of Dekkera bruxellensis under oxygen limited or anaerobic conditions. Yeast 2012, 29:265-274.
9. Conterno L., Joseph C., Arvik T.J., Henick-Kling T., Bisson L.F. Genetic and physiological characterization of Brettanomyces bruxellensis strains isolated from wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2006, 57:139-147.
10. Cramer A.C., Vlassides S., Block D.E. Kinetic model for nitrogen-limited wine fermentations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 77:49-60.
11. Dias L., Pereira-da-Silva S., Tavares M., Malfeito-Ferreira M., Loureiro V. Factors affecting the production of 4-ethyl phenol by the yeast Dekkera bruxellensis in enological conditions. Food Microbiol. 2003, 20:377-384.
12. Dukes B.C., Butzke C.E. Rapid determination of primary amino acids in grape juice using an o-phthaldialdehyde/N-acetyl-L-cysteine spectrophotometric assay. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1998, 49:125-134.
13. Erasmus D.J., van der Merwe G.K., van Vuuren H.J.J. Genome-wide expression analyses: metabolic adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high sugar stress. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003, 3:375-399.
14. Ingledew W.M., Kunkee R.E. Factors influencing sluggish fermentations of grape juice. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1985, 36:65-76.
15. Jensen S.L., Umiker N.L., Arneborg N., Edwards C.G. Identification and characterization of Dekkera bruxellensis, Candida pararugosa, and Pichia guillermondii isolated from commercial red wines. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26:915-921.
16. Jiranek V., Langridge P., Henschke P.A. Amino acid and ammonium utilization by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts from a chemically defined medium. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1995, 46:75-83.
17. Julien A., Roustan J.L., Dulau L., Sablayrolles J.M. Comparison of nitrogen and oxygen demands of enological yeasts: technological consequences. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2000, 46:215-222.
18. Martínez-Moreno R., Morales P., Gonzalez R., Mas A., Beltran G. Biomass production and alcoholic fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a function of nitrogen source. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012, 12:477-485.
19. Mauricio J.C., Salmon J.M. Apparent loss of sugar transport activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae may mainly account for maximum ethanol production during alcoholic fermentation. Biotechnol. Lett. 1992, 14:577-582.
20. Medawar W., Strehaiano P., Delia M. Yeast growth: lag phase modeling in alcoholic media. Food Microbiol. 2003, 20:527-532.
21. Mendes-Ferreira A., Mendes-Faia A., Leão C. Growth and fermentation patterns of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different ammonium concentrations and its implications in winemaking industry. J.Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97:540-545.
22. Mira de Orduña R. Climate change associated effects on grape and wine quality and production. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43:1844-1855.
23. Nishino H., Miyazaki S., Tohjo K. Effect of osmotic pressure on the growth rate and fermentation activity of wine yeasts. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1985, 36:170-174.
24. Oelofse A., Pretorius I.S., du Toit M. Significance of Brettanomyces and Dekkera during winemaking: a synoptic review. South Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2008, 29:128-144.
25. Ough C.S., Huang Z., An D., Stevens D. Amino acid uptake by four commercial yeasts at two different temperatures of growth and fermentation: effects on urea excretion and readsorption. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1991, 41:26-40.
26. Petrie P.R., Sadras V.O. Advancement of grapevine maturity in Australia between 1993 and 2006: putative causes, magnitude of trends and viticultural consequences. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2008, 14:33-45.
27. Sadras V.O., Moran M.A. Elevated temperature decouples anthocyanins and sugars in berries of Shiraz and Cabernet Franc. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2012, 18:115-122.
28. Schütz M., Gafner J. Lower fructose uptake capacity of genetically characterized strains of Saccharomyces bayanus compared to strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a likely cause of reduced alcoholic fermentation activity. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1995, 46:175-180.
29. Spayd S.E., Andersen-Bagge J. Free amino acid composition of grape juice from 12 Vitis vinifera cultivars in Washington. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1996, 47:389-402.
30. 2S formation. J.Wine Res. 2013, 24:182-194.
31. Taillandier P., Ramon Portugal F., Fuster A., Strehaiano P. Effect of ammonium concentration on alcoholic fermentation kinetics by wine yeasts for high sugar content. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24:95-100.
32. Ugliano M., Fredrizzi B., Siebert T., Travis B., Magno F., Versini G., Henschke P.A. Effect of nitrogen supplementation and Saccharomyces species on hydrogen sulfide and other volatile sulfur compounds in Shiraz fermentation and wine. J.Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57:4948-4955.
33. Vigentini I., Romano A., Compagno C., Merico A., Molinari F., Tirelli A., Foschino R., Volonterio G. Physiological and oenological traits of different Dekkera/Brettanomyces bruxellensis strains under wine-model conditions. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8:1087-1096.
34. Wang X.D., Bohlscheid J.C., Edwards C.G. Fermentative activity and production of volatile compounds by Saccharomyces grown in synthetic grape juice media deficient in assimilable nitrogen and/or pantothenic acid. J.Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94:349-359.
35. Zuehlke J.M., Edwards C.G. Impact of sulfur dioxide and temperature on culturability and viability of Brettanomyces bruxellensis in wine. J.Food Prot. 2013, 76:2024-2030.