Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon

Cognition

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 203-236

  Sonnenstuhl, Ingrid ^a   Eisenbeiss, Sonja ^b   Clahsen, Harald ^c  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

German inflection; Mental lexicon; Morphological priming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MODEL; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; REVIEW; VERBAL MEMORY;

EID: 0033607308     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00033-5     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alegre M., Gordon P. Red rats eater exposes recursion in children's word formation. Cognition. 60:1996;65-82.
2. Baayen H., Piepenbrock R., van Rijn H. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD ROM). 1993;Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Baumann H., Nagengast J., Klaas G. New Experimental Setup (NESU). 1993;MPI für Psycholinguistik, Nijmegen.
4. Butterworth B. Lexical representation. Butterworth B., Language Production. 2:1983;257-294 Academic Press, London.
5. Bybee J. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes. 10:1995;425-455.
6. Cappa S., Ullman M. A neural dissociation in Italian verbal morphology. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience SS. 1998;53.
7. Chialant D., Caramazza A. Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. Feldman L., Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. 1995;55-76 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
8. Chomsky N. The Minima List Program. 1995;321-351 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Clahsen H., Rothweiler M. Inflectional rules in children'srammars: Evidence from German participles. Yearbook of Morphology 1992. 1993;1-34.
10. Clahsen H., Rothweiler M., Woest A., Marcus G. Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition. 45:1992;225-255.
11. Clahsen H., Marcus G.F., Bartke S., Wiese R. Compounding and inflection in German child language. Yearbook of Morphology 1995. 1996;115-142.
12. Clahsen H., Eisenbeiss S., Sonnenstuhl-Henning I. Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics. 23:1997;201-249.
13. Clahsen H. The representation of participles in the German mental lexicon: Evidence for the dual-mechanism model. Yearbook of Morphology 1996. 1997;73-95.
14. Clahsen H. Lexical entries and rules of language: a mulitdisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22:1999;. (in press).
15. Drews E., Zwitserlood P. Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;1098-1116.
16. Elman J., Bates E., Johnson M., Karmiloff-Smith A., Parisi D., Plunkett K. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. 1996;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Feldman L., Fowler C. The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure. Memory and Cognition. 15:1987;1-12.
18. Feldman L. Beyond orthography and phonology: differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;442-470.
19. Forster K.I., Davis C., Schoknecht C., Carter R. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 39:1987;211-251.
20. Fowler C., Napps S., Feldman L. Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition. 13:1985;241-255.
21. Frauenfelder U., Schreuder R. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991. 1992;165-183.
22. Grainger J., Cole P., Segui J. Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;370-384.
23. Gross M., Say T., Kleingers M., Münte T.F., Clahsen H. Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words. Neuroscience Letters. 241:1998;83-86.
24. Jackendoff R. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. 1997;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Kempley S., Morton J. The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology. 73:1982;441-454.
26. Laudanna A., Burani C. Address mechanisms to decomposed lexical entries. Linguistics. 23:1985;775-792.
27. Laudanna A., Burani C. Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. Feldman L., Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. 1995;345-364 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
28. Manelis L., Tharp D. The processing of affixed words. Memory and Cognition. 5:1977;690-695.
29. Marcus G.F., Brinkmann U., Clahsen H., Wiese R., Pinker S. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology. 29:1995;189-256.
30. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L. Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature. 387:1997;592-594.
31. Marslen-Wilson W., Hare M., Older L. Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 1993;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
32. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33.
33. Münte T.F., Say T., Clahsen H., Schiltz K., Kutas M. Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research. 7:1998;241-253.
34. Napps S. Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory and Cognition. 17:1989;729-739.
35. Orsolini M., Marslen-Wilson W. Universals in morphological representation: Evidence from Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes. 12:1997;1-47.
36. Penke M., Weyerts H., Gross M., Zander E., Münte T.F., Clahsen H. How the brain processes complex words: An event-related potential study of German verb inflections. Cognitive Brain Research. 6:1997;37-52.
37. Pinker S., Prince A. The Reality of Linguistic Rules. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammer. Lima S.D., Corrigan R.L., Inversion G.K., The reality of linguistic rules. 1994;John Benjamins, Philadelphia.
38. Pinker S. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. 1999;. Unpublished manuscript.
39. Plaut D., McClelland J., Seidenberg M., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115.
40. Rueckl J., Mikolinski M., Raveh M., Miner C., Mars F. Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;382-405.
41. Rumelhart D., McClelland J. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? McClelland J., Rumelhart D., PDP Research Group, Parallel Distributed Processing. 2:1986;216-271 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Say T. Regular and irregular inflection in the mental lexicon: evidence from Italian. Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics. 2:1998;55-70.
43. Schreuder R., Baayen H. Modeling morphological processing. Feldman L., Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. 1995;131-154 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
44. Seidenberg M., McClelland J. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 96:1989;523-568.
45. Sereno J., Jongman A. Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition. 25:1997;425-437.
46. Stanners R., Neiser J., Hernon W., Hall R. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 18:1979;399-412.
47. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 14:1975;638-647.
48. Taft M., Hambly G. Exploring the cohort model of spoken word recognition. Cognition. 22:1986;259-282.
49. Taft M. Recognition of affixed words and the word-frequency effect. Memory and Cognition. 7:1979;263-272.
50. Taft M. A morphological decomposition model of lexical representation. Linguistics. 26:1988;657-667.
51. Taft M. Interactive activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;271-294.
52. Tenpenny P. Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2:1995;339-363.
53. Ullman M., Corkin S., Coppola M., Hickok G., Growdon J., Koroshetz W., Pinker S. A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 9:1997;266-276.
54. Weyerts H., Penke M., Dohrn U., Clahsen H., Münte T.F. Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German noun plurals. NeuroReport. 8:1997;957-962.
55. Wiese R. Phonological versus morphological rules: on German umlaut and ablaut. Journal of Linguistics. 32:1996;113-165.
56. Winer B. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 1971;McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo.
57. Wunderlich D., Fabri R. Minimalist Morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft. 14:1995;236-294.