The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning

Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 37-55

  Stein, Mary Kay ^a   Kim, Gooyeon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908983260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203884645     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Ball, D. L. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40-48.
3. Ball, D. L. (2001). Teaching with respect to mathematics and students. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 11-22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8.
5. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (2002). Instructional improvement and the problem of scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
6. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. National Bureau of Economic Research. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
7. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
9. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
10. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
11. Carpenter, T., Hiebert, J., & Moser, J. (1983). The effect of instruction on children's solutions of addition and subtraction work problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 55-72.
12. Coburn, C. E. (2001). Making sense of reading: Logics of reading in the institutional environment and the classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
13. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure, S95-S120.
14. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning. Elementary School Journal, 103, 287-311.
15. Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California's public schools. Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1936-1966.
16. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
17. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159-199.
18. Elmore, R., Peterson, P., & McCarthey, S. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Frank, K., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77, 148-171.
21. Franke, M., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In T. Wood, B. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy in teaching elementary mathematics: The nature of facilitative teaching (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Freeman, D. J., & Porter, A. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 403-421.
23. Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335-397.
24. Gallucci, C. (2003). Communities of practice and the mediation of teachers' responses to standardsbased reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(35). Retrieved January 8, 2008 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n35.
25. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
26. Grossman, P. A., Weinberg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1,012.
27. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-101). New York, NY:Macmillan.
28. Hightower, A. M., Knapp, M., Marsh, J. A., & McLaughlin, M. (Eds.). (2002). School districts and instructional renewal. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
29. Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H, & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning. School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York, NY: Routledge.
30. Leinhardt, G., & Steele, M. D. (2005). Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 87-163.
31. Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers' conceptions of a reform curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 227-252.
32. Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 532-575.
33. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring school. American Education Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798.
34. McLaughlin, M., & Oberman, I. (Eds.). (1996). Teacher learning: New policies, new practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
35. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
37. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
38. Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 315-342.
39. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350.
40. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
41. Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 135-405.
42. Schilling, M. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 312-334.
43. Schneider, R., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221-245.
44. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York, NY: Academic Press.
45. Schoenfeld, A. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in education, 4(1), 1-95.
46. Sherin, M. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119-150.
47. Smith, J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 387-402.
48. Smylie, M. A., & Evans, A. E. (2006). Social capital and the problem of implementation. In M. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 187-208). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
49. Smylie, M. A., & Hart, A. W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd Edition) (pp. 421-441). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
50. Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1997). Teacher learning in a social context: Integrating collaborative and institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fenemma, & B. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 155-191). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
52. Stein, M. K., Kim, G., & Seeley, M. (2006). The enactment of reform mathematics curricula in urban settings: A comparative analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
53. Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 17-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing Standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
55. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York, NY: The Free Press.
56. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 12-16.
57. TERC. (1998). Investigations in number, data, and space (1st Edition). Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.
58. University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (2004). Everyday mathematics (2nd Edition). Chicago, IL: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
59. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind in action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.