Controversy and change in how we view L2 writing in international contexts

Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 282-298

  Casanave, Christine Pearson ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908961093     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203819159     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journalof Second Language Writing, 17(1), 102-118.
2. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
4. Cargill, M., O’ Connor, P., & Li, Y. (2011). Educating Chinese scientists to write for international journals: Addressing the divide between science and technology education and English language teaching. English for SpecificPurposes, doi:10.1016/ j.esp.2011.05.003
5. Casanave, C. P. (2003). Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship (But should it be called “post-process”?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 85-102.
6. Casanave, C. P. (2004). Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas anddecisions in research and instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
7. Casanave, C. P. (2009). Training for writing or training for reality? Challenges facing writing teachers and students in language teacher education programs. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 256-277). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal ofSecond Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
9. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-languagewriting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Connor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal ofEnglish for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 291-304.
11. Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
12. Currie, P. (1999). Transferable skills: Promoting student research. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 329-345.
13. Dillard, A. (1989). The writing life. New York: Harper & Row.
14. Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-11.
15. Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
17. Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40-53.
18. Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(4), 329-350.
19. Hayes, J. R., Hatch, J. A., & Silk, C. M. (2000). Does holistic assessment predict writing performance? Estimating the consistency of student performance on holistically scored writing assignments. Written Communication, 17(1), 3-26.
20. Hinds, J. (1983). Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text, 3, 183-195.
21. Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor, & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Horowitz, D. (1986). Process not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 141-144.
23. Huot, B. (1996). Toward a new theory of writing assessment. College Compositionand Communication, 47(4), 549-566.
24. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.
25. Johns, A. M. (1988). The discourse community dilemma: Identifying transferable skills for the academic milieu. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 55-60.
26. Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural communication. Language Learning, 16(1), 1-20.
27. Kramsch, C. (2002). “How can we tell the dancer from the dance?” In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 1-30). New York: Continuum.
28. Kubota, R. (1997). A reevaluation of the uniqueness of Japanese written discourse. Written Communication, 14 (4), 460-480.
29. Kubota, R. (1998). An investigation of L1-L2 transfer in writing among Japanese university students: Implications for contrastive rhetoric. Journal of SecondLanguage Writing, 7(1), 69-100.
30. Kubota, R., & Lehner, A. (2004). Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal ofSecond Language Writing, 13(1), 7-27.
31. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and appliedlinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Leki, I. (2007). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexitiesof academic literacy development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Li, Y. (2006). Negotiating knowledge contribution to multiple discourse communities: A doctoral student of computer science writing for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 159-178.
34. Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politicsand practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.
35. Manchón, R. (Ed.). (2009a). Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
36. Manchón, R. (2009b). Introduction: Broadening the perspective of L2 writing scholarship: The contribution of research on foreign language writing. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, andresearch (pp. 1-19). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
37. Matsuda, P. K. (1997). Contrastive rhetoric in context: A dynamic model of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(1), 45-60.
38. Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317-345.
39. Reichelt, M. (2009). A critical evaluation of writing teaching programmes in different foreign language settings. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreignlanguage contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 183-206). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
40. Reid, J. (1984). The radical outliner and the radical brainstormer. TESOLQuarterly, 18, 529-533.
41. Swales, J. (1988). Discourse communities, genres and English as an international language. World Englishes, 7(2), 211-220.
42. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369.
44. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272.
45. Truscott, J. (2009). Dialogue: Arguments and appearances: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 59-60.
46. Truscott, J. (2010). Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System, 38(2), 329-335.
47. Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journalof Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292-305.
48. Tudor, I. (2003). Learning to live with complexity: An ecological perspective on language teaching. System, 31(1), 1-12.
49. van Lier, L. (2002). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization:Ecological perspectives (pp. 140-164). New York: Continuum.
50. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A socioculturalperspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
51. Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly,16(2), 195-209.
52. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing process of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-187.