Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 41, Issue , 2015, Pages 1385-1394

  Frederiks, Elisha R ^a   Stenner, Karen ^a   Hobman, Elizabeth V ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Behavior change; Behavioral economics; Energy conservation; Energy consumption; Household energy use; Psychology

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES;

BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; BEHAVIOUR CHANGES; CONSUMER DECISION MAKING; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CONSUMPTION; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY USE; POLICY MAKERS; PSYCHOLOGY; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY;

ENERGY UTILIZATION;

EID: 84908409001     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.026     Document Type: Review

References (161)

1. Sligo FX, Jameson AM. The knowledge-behavior gap in use of health information. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2000;51:858-69.
2. Kennedy T, Regehr G, Rosenfield J, Roberts SW, Lingard L. Exploring the gap between knowledge and behavior: a qualitative study of clinician action following an educational intervention. Acad Med 2004;79:386-93.
3. Courtenay-Hall P, Rogers L. Gaps in mind: problems in environmental knowledge-behaviour modelling research. Environ Educ Res 2002;8:283-97.
4. Blake J. Overcoming the 'value-action gap' in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Int J Justice Sustainability 1999;4:257-78.
5. Boulstridge E, Carrigan M. Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap J Commun Manage 2000;4:355-68.
6. Flynn R, Bellaby P, Ricci M. The 'value-action gap' in public attitudes towards sustainable energy: the case of hydrogen energy. Sociol Rev 2010;57:159-80.
7. Huddart-Kennedy E, Beckley TM, McFarlane BL, Nadeau S. Why we don't walk the talk: understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Hum Ecol Rev 2009;16:151-60.
8. Sheeran P. Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur J Soc Psychol 2011;12:1-36.
9. Sheeran P, Abraham C. Mediator of moderators: temporal stability of intention and the intention-behavior relation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2003;29:205-15.
10. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 2002;8:239-60.
11. Abrahamse W, Steg L. Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: the role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Hum Ecol Rev 2011;18:30-40.
12. Lutzenhiser L. Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annu Rev Energy Environ 1993;18:247-89.
13. Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, Rothengatter T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Environ Psychol 2005;25:273-91.
14. Schultz PW. Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior: lots of tools but few instructions. Eur Psychol 2013;23:1-11 (Sep).
15. Mellstrom C, Johannesson M. Crowding out in blood donation: was Titmuss right? J Eur Econ Assoc 2008;6:845-63.
16. Menges R, Schroeder C, Traub S. Altruism, warm glow and the willingness-to-donate for green electricity: an artefactual field experiment. Environ Resour Econ 2005;31:431-58.
17. Frey B, Goette L. Does pay motivate volunteers? Working paper series no 7. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich; 1999.
18. Frey B, Jegen R. Motivation crowding theory: a survey of empirical evidence. J Econ Surv 2001;15:589-611.
19. Ariely D. Predictably irrational: the hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, US: HarperCollins; 2008.
20. Shogren JF, Taylor LO. On behavioral-environmental economics. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2008;2:26-44.
21. DiClemente DF, Hantula DA. Applied behavioral economics and consumer choice. J Econ Psychol 2003;24:589-602.
22. Wilson C, Dowlatabadi H. Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2007;32:169-203.
23. Pollitt MG, Shaorshadze I. The role of behavioural economics in energy and climate policy. In: Fouquet R, editor. Handbook on Energy and Climate Change. Edward Elgar; 2013.
24. Simon HA. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 1955;69:99-118.
25. Simon HA. Models of man: social and rational. New York, NY: Wiley; 1957.
26. Becker GS. Irrational Behaviour and Economic Theory. J Polit Economy 1962;70:1-13.
27. Krugman P. Neo Fights (Slightly Wonkish and Vague). The New York Times. Published 28 August 2012. The New York Times. New York: The New York Times; 2012.
28. Blume LE, Easley D. Rationality. 2nd ed.The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics; 2008.
29. Coleman JS, Fararo TS. Rational choice theory: advocacy and critique. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications; 1992.
30. Goode WJ. Rational choice theory. Am Sociol 1997;28:22-41.
31. Weintraub ER. Neoclassical economics. The concise encyclopedia of economics. Library of Economics and Liberty; 1993.
32. Henry JF. The making of neoclassical economics. Oxon, UK: Routledge; 2011.
33. Kahneman D. A psychological perspective on economics. Am Econ Rev 2003;93:162.
34. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev 2003;93:1449-75.
35. Stern P. What psychology knows about energy conservation. Am Psychol 1992;47:1224.
36. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W. Heuristic decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 2011;62:451-82.
37. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
38. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn Psychol 1973;5:207-32.
39. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974;185:1124-31.
40. Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload J Consum Res 2010;37:409-25.
41. Greifeneder R, Scheibehenne B, Kleber N. Less may be more when choosing is difficult: choice complexity and too much choice. Acta Psychol 2010;133:45-50.
42. Iygnar S, Lepper M. When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol 2000;79:995-1006.
43. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J Econ Perspect 1991;5:193-206.
44. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertainty 1988;1:7-59.
45. Pichert D, Katsikopoulos KV. Green defaults: information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 2008;28:63-73.
46. Brennan T. Consumer preference not to choose: methodological and policy implications. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future (RFF); 2006 (Discussion paper 05-51).
47. Hartman RS, Doane MJ, Woo C. Consumer rationality and the status quo. Q J Econ 1991;106:141-62.
48. Madrian BC, Shea DF. The power of suggestion: inertia in 401 (k) participation and savings behavior. Q J Econ 2001;116:1149-87.
49. Brown R. Consideration of the origin of Herbert Simon's theory of satisficing (1933-1947). Manage Decis 2004;42:1240-56.
50. Schwartz B, Ward A, Monterosso J, Lyubomirsky S, White K, Lehman DR. Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002;83:1178-97.
51. Sharfir E, Simonson I, Tversky A. Reason-based choice. Cognition 1993;49:11-36.
52. Tversky A, Shafir E. Choice under conflict: the dynamics of deferred decision. Psychol Sci 1992;3:358-61.
53. Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler G. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. J Polit Economy 1990;98:1325-48.
54. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;47:263-91.
55. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty 1992;5:297-323.
56. Thaler RH. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ 1980;1:39-60.
57. Viscusi WK, Magat WA, Huber J. An investigation of the rationality of consumer valuations of multiple health risks. RAND J Econ 1987;18:465-79.
58. Weber BJ, Chapman GB. Playing for peanuts: why is risk seeking more common for low-stakes gambles. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 2005;97:31-46.
59. Prelec D, Loewenstein L. Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach. Manage Sci 1991;37:770-86.
60. Garland H, Newport S. Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 1991;48:55-69.
61. Arkes HR, Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 1985;35:124-40.
62. Arkes HR, Ayton P. The sunk cost and Concorde effects: are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychol Bull 1999;125:591-600.
63. Garland H. Throwing good money after bad: the effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. J Appl Psychol 1990;75:728.
64. Loewenstein G, Thaler RH. Anomalies: intertemporal choice. J Econ Perspect 1989;3:181-93.
65. Thaler RH. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econ Lett 1981;8:201-7.
66. Lynch Jr JG, Zauberman G. When do you want it? Time, decisions, and public policy J Public Policy Marketing 2006;25:67-78.
67. Critchfield TS, Kollins SH. Temporal discounting: basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior. J Appl Behav Anal 2001;34:101-122.
68. Jacquet J, Hagel K, Hauert C, Marotzke J, Röhl T, Milinski M. Intra-and intergenerational discounting in the climate game. Nat Clim Change 2013.
69. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 2002;40:351-401.
70. Feldman DC. The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad Manage Rev 1984;9:47-55.
71. Hackman JR. Group influences on individuals in organizations. In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM, editors. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1992. p. 234-45.
72. Cialdini RB, Trost MR. Social influence: social norms, conformity and compliance. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, editors. The handbook of social psychology. 4th ed.. New York, US: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 151-92.
73. Cialdini RB. Influence: science and practice. 5th ed.. United States: Pearson Educational Incorporated; 2003.
74. Corneo G, Snobs Jeanne O. bandwagons, and the origin of social customs in consumer behavior. J Econ Behav Organ 1997;32:333-47.
75. Zanna M, Olson JM, Herman CP. Social influence: the Ontario symposium. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2014.
76. Pratkanis AR. The science of social influence. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2007.
77. Olson JM, Herman CP, Zanna MP. Relative deprivation and social comparison: the Ontario symposium. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2014.
78. Smith HJ, Pettigrew TF, Pippin GM, Bialosiewicz S. Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2012;16: 3203-32.
79. Andreoni J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J 1990;100:464-77.
80. Stern P. Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. J Consum Policy 1999;22:461-78.
81. Dwyer WO, Leeming FC, Cobern MK, Porter BE, Jackson JM. Critical review of behavioural interventions to preserve the environment: research since 1980. Environ Behav 1993;25:275-321.
82. Winett RA, Kagel JH, Battalio RC, Winkler RC. Effects of monetary rebates, feedback, and information on residential electricity conservation. J Appl Psychol 1978;63:73-80.
83. Katzev RD, Johnson TR. Comparing the effects of monetary incentives and foot-in-the-door strategies in promoting residential electricity conservation. J Appl Soc Psychol 1984;14:12-27.
84. Lepper MR, Greene D, Nisbett RE. Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the" overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973;28(1):129.
85. Merritt AC, Effron DA, Monin B. Moral self-licensing: when being good frees us to be bad. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 2010;4:344-57.
86. Monin B, Miller DT. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;81:33-43.
87. Deci EL. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1971;18:105-15.
88. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull 1999;125:627-68.
89. Handgraaf MJJ, Van Lidth de Jeude MA, Appelt KC. Public praise vs. private pay: effects of rewards on energy conservation in the workplace. Ecol Econ 2013;86:86-92.
90. Titmuss RM. The gift relationship: from human blood to social policy. New York, NY: New Press; 1997.
91. Gneezy U, Rustichini A. Pay enough or don't pay at all. Q J Econ 2000;115:791-810.
92. Stroebe W, Frey BS. Self-interest and collective action: the economics and psychology of public goods. Br J Soc Psychol 1982;21:121-37.
93. Kerr NL. Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983;45.
94. Simms A, Nichols T. Social loafing: a review of the literature. J Manage 2014;15:59.
95. Kerr NL, Bruun SE. Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983;44:78-94.
96. Earle TC, Cvetkovich GT. Social trust: toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1995.
97. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Anal 2003;23:961-72.
98. Renn O, Levine D. Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson RE, Stallen PJM, editors. Communicating risks to the public. The Hague: Kluwer; 1991. p. 175-218.
99. Siegrist M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Anal 2000;20:195-203.
100. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich M, Roth C. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Anal 2000;20:353-62.
101. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G. Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Anal 2000;20:713-9.
102. Terwel B, Harnick F, Ellemers N, Daamen D. Going beyond the properties of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technology: how trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011;5:181-8.
103. Terwel B, Harnick F, Ellemers N, Daamen D. Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). Risk Anal 2009;29:1129-40.
104. Terwel B, Harnick F, Ellemers N, Daamen D. How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: the case of carbon dioxide capture and storage. J Environ Psychol 2009;29:290-9.
105. Costanzo M, Archer D, Aronson E, Pettigrew T. Energy conservation behavior: the difficult path from information to action. Am Psychol 1986;41:521-8.
106. Gabrielcik A, Fazio RH. Priming and frequency estimation: a strict test of the availability heuristic. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1984;10:85-9.
107. Taylor SE. The availability bias in social perception and interaction. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, editors. Judgment under uncertainty Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 190-200.
108. McCalley LT. From motivation and cognition theories to everyday applications and back again: the case of product-integrated information and feedback. Energy Policy 2006;34:129-37.
109. Todd A, Cappers P, Goldman C. Residential customer enrollment in time-based rate and enabling technology programs. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; 2013.
110. Wood W, Tam L, Witt MG. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005;88:918-33.
111. Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Marketing 2006;25:90-103.
112. Osbaldiston R, Schott JP. Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: a meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environ Behav 2012;44:257-99.
113. Steg L, Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 2009;29:309-17.
114. Iyengar SS, Jiang W, Huberman G. How much choice is too much: determinants of individual contributions in 401 K retirement plans. Philadelphia, US: University of Pennsylvania; 2003 (Pension research council working paper 2003-10).
115. Davis JJ. The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism Mass Commun Q 1995;72:285-99.
116. Loroz S. The interaction of message frames and reference points in prosocial persuasive appeals. Psychol Marketing 2007;24:1001-23.
117. Cheng T, Woon DK, Lynes JK. The use of message framing in the promotion of environmentally sustainable behaviors. Soc Marketing Q 2011;17:48-62.
118. Obermiller C. The baby is sick/the baby is well: a test of environmental communication appeals. J Advertising 1995;24:55-70.
119. Gonzales MH, Aronson E, Costanzo M. Using social cognition and persuasion to promote energy conservation: a quasi-experiment. J Appl Soc Psychol 1988;18:1049-66.
120. Kuliasha MA, Zucker A, Ballew KJ. Technologies for a greenhouse-constrained society. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 1992.
121. Hirst E, Brown M. Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resour Conserv Recycl 1990;3:267-81.
122. Schiffman LG, Kanuk LL. Consumer behavior. 10th ed.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2009.
123. San Martín S, Camarero C. How perceived risk affects online buying. Online Inf Rev 2009;33:629-54.
124. Pires G, Stanton J, Eckford A. Influences on the perceived risk of purchasing online. J Consum Behav 2004;4:118-31.
125. Cases A-S. Perceived risk and risk-reduction strategies in Internet shopping. Int Rev Retail, Distrib Consum Res 2002;12:375-94.
126. Derbaix C. Perceived risk and risk relievers: an empirical investigation. J Econ Psychol 1983;3:19-38.
127. Van den Poel D, Leunis J. Consumer acceptance of the internet as a channel of distribution. J Bus Res 1999;45:249-56.
128. Lantos GP. Consumer behavior in action: real-life applications for marketing managers. New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc; 2011.
129. Northcraft G, Neale M. Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes. 1986;37:348-56.
130. Tan H-T, Yates JF. Sunk cost effects: the influences of instruction and future return estimates. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 1995;63:311-9.
131. Simonson I, Staw BM. Deescalation strategies: a comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. J Appl Psychol 1992;77:419.
132. Thaler RH, Benartzi S. Save More Tomorrow™: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J Polit Economy 2004;112:S164-87.
133. Ariely D, Wertenbroch K. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: self-control by precommitment. Psychol Sci 2002;13:219-24.
134. Joshi PD, Fast NJ. Power and reduced temporal discounting. Psychol Sci 2013 (0956797612457950).
135. Daniel TO, Stanton CM, Epstein LH. The future is now: reducing impulsivity and energy intake using episodic future thinking. Psychol Sci 2013.
136. Kim H, Schnall S, White MP. Similar psychological distance reduces temporal discounting. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2013.
137. Hershfield HE, Goldstein DG, Sharpe WF, Fox J, Yeykelis L, Carstensen LL, et al. Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. J Marketing Res 2011;48:S23-37.
138. Allcott H. Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ 2011;95:1082-95.
139. Allcott H, Mullainathan S. Behavioral science and energy policy. Cambridge, MA: Ideas42; 2010.
140. Costa DL, Kahn ME. Energy conservation "nudges" and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. NBER working paper series no. 15939; 2010.
141. Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. Normative social influence is underdetected. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2008;34:913-23.
142. Cialdini RB. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2003;12:105-9.
143. Gockertitz S, Schultz PW, Rendon T, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: the moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. Eur J Soc Psychol 2010;40:514-23.
144. Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V, Cialdini RB. Invoking social norms: a social psychology perspective on improving hotels' linen-reuse programs. Cornell Hotel Restaurant Admin Q 2007;48:145.
145. Smith JR, Louis WR, Terry DJ, Greenaway KH, Clarke MR, Cheng X. Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions J Environ Psychol 2012;32:353-61.
146. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 2007;18:429-34.
147. Ayres I, Raseman S, Shih A. Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. J Law, Econ Organ 2012;29:992-1022.
148. Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Consum Res 2008;35:472-82.
149. Cialdini RB, Demaine L, Sagarin BJ, Barrett DW, Rhaods K, Winter PL. Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Soc Influence 2006;1:3-15.
150. Ostrom E. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Am Polit Sci Rev 1998;92:1-22.
151. Seaver WB, Patterson AH. Decreasing fuel-oil consumption through feedback and social commendation. J Appl Behav Anal 1976;9:147-52.
152. Gunnthorsdottir A, Rapoport A. Embedding social dilemmas in intergroup competition reduces free-riding. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 2006;101:184-99.
153. Twenge JM, Baumeister RF, DeWall CN, Ciarocco NJ, Bartels JM. Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 2007;92:56-66.
154. Craig S, McCann J. Assessing communication effects of energy conservation. J Consum Res 1978;3:82-8.
155. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Prior attitudes, salient value similarity, and dimensionality: toward an integrative model of trust in risk regulation. J Appl Soc Psychol 2006;36:1674-700.
156. Bekker MJ, Cumming TD, Osborne NK, Bruining AM, McClean JI, Leland LS. Encouraging electricity savings in a university residential hall through a combination of feedback, visual prompts, and incentives. J Appl Behav Anal 2010;43:327-31.
157. Tetlow RM, Beaman CP, Elmualim AA, Couling K. Simple prompts reduce inadvertent energy consumption from lighting in office buildings. Building and Environment 2014;81:234-42.
158. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2008.
159. Beretti A, Figuières C, Grolleau G. Behavioral innovations: the missing capital in sustainable development? Ecol Econ 2013;89:187-95.
160. Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin DL. Sinning Saints and Saintly Sinners: The Paradox of Moral Self-Regulation. Psychological Science 2009;20:523-8.
161. Frey B, Meier S. Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: testing "conditional cooperation" in a field experiment. Am Econ Rev 2004;94:1717-22.