A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing under fuzzy environment

Applied Soft Computing Journal

Volumn 25, Issue , 2014, Pages 519-529

  Avikal, Shwetank ^a   Jain, Rajeev ^b   Mishra, P K ^b  

^a GRAPHIC ERA HILL UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b MOTILAL NEHRU NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Fuzzy AHP; Heuristic; Kano model; Line balancing; MCDM; Product disassembly; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

FUZZY AHP; HEURISTIC; KANO MODEL; LINE BALANCING; MCDM; PRODUCT DISASSEMBLY; TOPSIS;

SOFT COMPUTING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84908355358     PISSN: 15684946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. A. Gungor, and S.M. Gupta Disassembly line in product recovery Int. J. Prod. Res. 40 11 2002 2569 2589
2. A. Gungor, and S.M. Gupta Disassembly sequence plan generation using a branch-and-bound algorithm Int. J. Prod. Res. 39 3 2001 481 509
3. A. Gungor, and S.M. Gupta A solution approach to the disassembly line problem in the presence of task failures Int. J. Prod. Res. 39 7 2001 1427 1467
4. A.D.J. Lambert Disassembly sequencing: a survey Int. J. Prod. Res. 41 2003 3721 3759
5. A.J.D. Lambert Linear programming in disassembly/clustering sequence generation Comput. Ind. Eng. 36 1999 723 738
6. A. Koc, I. Sabuncuoglu, and E. Erel Two exact formulations for disassembly line balancing problems with task precedence diagram construction using an AND/OR graph IIE Trans. Oper. Eng. 41 2009 866 881
7. A.R. Singh, P.K. Mishra, Rajeev Jain, and M.K. Khurana Robust strategies for mitigating operational and disruption risks: a fuzzy AHP approach Int. J. Multicriteria Decis. Mak. 2 1 2012 1 28
8. A. Chaudha, R. Jain, A.R. Singh, and P.K. Mishra Integration of Kano's model into quality function deployment (QFD) Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 53 2011 689 698
9. C. Berger, R. Blauth, D. Boger, C. Bolster, G. Burchill, W. DuMouchel, F. Pouliot, R. Richter, A. Rubinoff, D. Shen, M. Timko, and D. Walden Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality Cent. Qual. Manage. J. 2 4 1993 2 36
10. C.L. Hwang, and K. Yoon Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications 1981 Springer Heidelberg
11. I. Chamodrakas, I. Leftheriotis, and D. Martakos In-depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS Appl. Soft Comput. 11 2011 900 907
12. F.T. Altekin, L. Kandiller, and N.E. Ozdemirel Profit-oriented disassembly-line balancing Int. J. Prod. Res. 46 10 2008 2675 2693
13. F.T.S. Chan, N. Kumar, M.K. Tiwari, H.C.W. Lau, and K.L. Choy Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach Int. J. Prod. Res. 46 14 2007 3825 3857
14. F. Torfi, R.Z. Farahani, and S. Rezapour Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives Appl. Soft Comput. 10 2010 520 528
15. G. Tontini Integrating the Kano model and QFD for designing new products Total Qual. Manage. 18 6 2007 599 612
16. H.C. Yadav, R. Jain, A.R. Singh, and P.K. Mishra Robust design approach with fuzzy-AHP for product design to enhance aesthetic quality Int. J. Design Eng. 5 1 2012 65 90
17. H.C. Yadav, R. Jain, S. Shukla, and P.K. Mishra Prioritized aesthetic attributes of product a fuzzy-AHP approach Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 4 4 2012 1281 1291
18. H. Deng Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair wise comparison Int. J. Approximate Reason. 21 3 1999 215 231
19. K. De Brucker, A. Verbeke, and C. Macharis The applicability of multicriteria-analysis to the evaluation of intelligent transport systems (ITS) Res. Transport. Econ. 8 2004 151 179
20. K. Matzler, and H.H. Hinterhuber How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of the customer satisfaction into quality function deployment Technovation 18 1 1998 25 38
21. L.A. Zadeh Fuzzy sets Inform. Control 8 3 1965 338 353
22. L.S. Homem de Mello, and A.C. Sanderson And/or graph representation of assembly plans IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 6 1990 188 199
23. L. Turcksin, A. Bernardini, and C. Macharis A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 20 2011 954 965
24. L.C. Leung, and D. Cao On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP Eur. J. Oper. Res. 124 2000 102 113
25. L.P. Ding, Y.X. Feng, J.R. Tan, and Y.C. Gao A new multi-objective ant colony algorithm for solving the disassembly line balancing problems Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48 2010 761 771
26. M.C. Lin, C.C. Wang, M.S. Chen, and C.A. Chang Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process Comput. Ind. 59 2008 17 31
27. M.A. Ilgin, and S.M. Gupta Comparison of economic benefits of sensor embedded products and conventional products in a multi-product disassembly line Comput. Ind. Eng. 59 2010 748 763
28. M.K. Tiwari, N. Sinha, S. Kumar, R. Rai, and S.K. Mukhopadhyay A Petri Net based approach to determine strategy of a product Int. J. Prod. Res. 40 5 2001 1113 1129
29. N. Kano, K. Seraku, F. Takahashi, and S. Tshuji Attractive quality and must-be quality J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control 14 2 1984 39 48
30. R.J. Ranky, M. Subramanyam, R.J. Caudill, K. Limaye, and N. Alli Dynamic scheduling and line balancing methods, and software tools for lean and reconfigurable disassembly cells and lines Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Environment Boston, MA 2003 234 239
31. R. Jain, A.R. Singh, and P.K. Mishra Prioritization of supplier selection criteria: a fuzzy-AHP approach MIT Int. J. Mech. Eng. 3 1 2013 34 42
32. L. Ren, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, and Z. Sun Comparative analysis of a novel M-TOPSIS method and TOPSIS Appl. Math. Res. Express 2007 2007 10.1093/amrx/abm005 Article ID abm005, 10 pages
33. S. Agrawal, and M.K. Tiwari A collaborative ant colony algorithm to stochastic mixed-model U-shaped disassembly line balancing and sequencing problem Int. J. Prod. Res. 46 6 2008 1405 1429
34. S. Avikal, P.K. Mishra, and R. Jain An AHP and PROMETHEE methods based environment friendly heuristic for disassembly line balancing problems Interdiscip. Environ. Rev. 14 1 2013 69 85
35. S. Avikal, P.K. Mishra, and R. Jain An fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE methods based heuristic for disassembly line balancing problems Int. J. Prod. Res. 152 5 2014 1306 1317
36. S.M. Gupta, and A.J.D. Lambert Methods for optimum and near optimum disassembly sequencing Int. J. Prod. Res. 46 11 2008 2845 2865
37. S.M. McGovern, and S.M. Gupta 2-Opt heuristic for the disassembly line balancing problem Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing III 2003 Providence, RI 71 84
38. S.M. McGovern, and S.M. Gupta A balancing method and genetic algorithm for disassembly line balancing Eur. J. Oper. Res. 179 2007 692 708
39. S.M. McGovern, and S.M. Gupta Ant colony optimization for disassembly sequencing with multiple objectives Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 30 2006 481 496
40. S.M. McGovern, and S.M. Gupta Combinatorial optimization analysis of the unary NP-complete disassembly line balancing problem Int. J. Prod. Res. 45 18-19 2007 4485 4511
41. Y. Tang, and M.C. Zhou A systematic approach to design and operation of disassembly lines IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 3 3 2006 324 329
42. Z. Gungor, G. Serhadlioglu, and S.E. Kesen A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem Appl. Soft Comput. 9 2009 641 646
43. S.M. Gupta, and K.N. Taleb Scheduling disassembly Int. J. Prod. Res. 32 8 1994 1857 1866
44. L. Martin, and W. Lars Two decades of using Kano's theory of attractive quality: a literature review Qual. Manage. J. 15 1 2008 59 78
45. K.C. Tan, and X.X. Shen Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of Quality Function Deployment Total Qual. Manage. 11 8 2000 1141 1151
46. J.J. Buckley Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis Fuzzy Set Syst. 17 1985 233 247
47. T.L. Saaty Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980 McGraw-Hill New York
48. N. Kano, N. Seraku, F. Takahashi, and S. Tshuji Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality, Best on Quality, IAQ Book Series vol. 7 1996 ASQC Milwaukee, U.S 165 186