Supervision pedagogies: narratives from the field

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 107-118

  Guerin, Cally ^a   Kerr, Heather ^a   Green, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

doctoral education; narrative; supervisor development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908061291     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2014.957271     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amundsen, C., and L. McAlpine. 2009. “‘Learning Supervision’: Trial by Fire.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (3): 331–342. doi:10.1080/14703290903068805.
2. Barnacle, R., and I. Mewburn. 2010. “Learning Networks and the Journey of ‘Becoming Doctor’.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (4): 433–444. doi:10.1080/03075070903131214.
3. Bitzer, E., and R. Albertyn. 2011. “Alternative Approaches to Postgraduate Supervision: A Planning Tool to Facilitate Supervisory Processes.” South African Journal of Higher Education 25 (5): 875–888.
4. Boud, D., and A. Lee. 2005. “‘Peer Learning’ as Pedagogic Discourse for Research Education.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (5): 501–516. doi:10.1080/03075070500249138.
5. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
6. Chase, S. E. 2005. “Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Voices.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed., edited by N. M. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 651–680. Thousand Oaks and London: SAGE.
7. Emilsson, U. M., and E. Johnsson. 2007. “Supervision of Supervisors: On Developing Supervision in Postgraduate Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 26 (2): 163–179. doi:10.1080/07294360701310797.
8. Gardner, S. K., and B. Barnes. 2014. Advising and Mentoring Doctoral Students: A Handbook. Amazon Kindle.
9. Gardner, S. K., J. Jansujwicz, K. Hutchins, B. Cline, and V. Levesque. 2012. “Interdisciplinary Doctoral Student Socialization.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 377–396.
10. Gatfield, T. 2005. “An Investigation into PhD Supervisory Management Styles: Development of a Dynamic Conceptual Model and its Managerial Implications.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (3): 311–325. doi:10.1080/13600800500283585.
11. Giblett, R. 1992. “The Desire for Disciples.” Paragraph 15: 136–155.
12. Grant, B. 2003. “Mapping the Pleasures and Risks of Supervision.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 24 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/01596300303042.
13. Green, B. 2005. “Unfinished Business: Subjectivity and Supervision.” Higher Education Research and Development 24 (2): 151–163. doi:10.1080/07294360500062953.
14. Group of Eight (Go8). 2013. The Changing PhD: Discussion Paper. Retrieved from http://www.go8.edu.au/university-staff/go8-policy-_and_-analysis/2013/the-changing-phd
15. Guerin, C. 2013. “Rhizomatic Research Cultures, Writing Groups and Academic Researcher Identities.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 8: 137–150.
16. Guerin, C., I. Green, and W. Bastalich. 2011. “Big Love: Managing a Team of Research Supervisors.” In Connecting the Local, Regional and International in Doctoral Education, edited by V. Kumar, and A. Lee, 138–153. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
17. Guerin, C. and I. Green. 2013. “‘They’re the Bosses’: Feedback in Team Supervision.” Journal of Higher and Further Education. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039.
18. Halse, C. 2011. “‘Becoming a Supervisor’: The Impact of Doctoral Supervision on Supervisors’ Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (5): 557–570. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.594593.
19. Halse, C., and J. Malfroy. 2010. “Retheorizing Doctoral Supervision as Professional Work.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 79–92. doi:10.1080/03075070902906798.
20. Higher Education Standards Panel. 2011. “Defining Quality Research Training.” Accessed December 19. http://docs.education.gov.au/documents/defining-quality-research-training-australia
21. Humphrey, R., N. Marshall, and L. Leonardo. 2012. “The Impact of Research Training and Research Code of Practice on Submission of Doctoral Degrees: An Exploratory Cohort Study.” Higher Education Quarterly 66 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00499.x.
22. Johnson, L., A. Lee, and B. Green. 2000. “The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, Rationality and Postgraduate Pedagogy.” Studies in Higher Education 25 (2): 135–147. doi:10.1080/713696141.
23. Kiley, M. 2013. “Coursework in Australian Doctoral Education: What’s Happening, Why, and Future Directions?.” Office of Teaching and Learning Project. Accessed December 11. http://chelt.anu.edu.au/doctoral-coursework
24. Lahenius, K., and H. Ikävalko. 2012. “Joint Supervision Practices in Doctoral Education – A Student Experience.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 8 (3): 427–446. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2012.706805.
25. Lee, A. 2007. “Developing Effective Supervisors: Concepts of Research Supervision.” South African Journal of Higher Education 21 (4): 680–693.
26. Lee, A. 2008. Supervision Teams: Making Them Work. Issues in Postgraduate Education: Management, Teaching and Supervision, Series 2, No. 6. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
27. Lee, A., and D. Boud. 2003. “Writing Groups, Change and Academic Identity: Research Development as Local Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 28 (2): 187–200. doi:10.1080/0307507032000058109.
28. Manathunga, C. 2012a. “Supervisors Watching Supervisors: The Deconstructive Possibilities and Tensions of Team Supervision.” Australian Universities’ Review 54 (1): 29–37.
29. Manathunga, C. 2012b. “‘Team’ Supervision: New Positionings in Doctoral Education Pedagogies.” In Reshaping Doctoral Education: Changing Programs and Pedagogies, edited by A. Lee, and S. Danby, 42–55. London: Routledge.
30. Manathunga, C., and J. Goozée. 2007. “Challenging the Dual Assumption of the ‘Always/Already’ Autonomous Student and Effective Supervisor.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (3): 309–322. doi:10.1080/13562510701278658.
31. McAlpine, L., and C. Amundsen. 2012. “Challenging the Taken-for-Granted: How Research Analysis Might Inform Pedagogical Practices and Institutional Policies Related to Doctoral Education.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (6): 683–694. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.537747.
32. McCormack, C. 2009. “Stories Return Personal Narrative Ways of Knowing to the Professional Development of Doctoral Supervisors.” Studies in Continuing Education 31 (2): 141–156. doi:10.1080/01580370902927485.
33. McFarlane, J. 2010. “Group Supervision: An Appropriate Way to Guide Postgraduate Students?” Acta Academica 42 (4): 148–170.
34. NAIRTL (National Academy for Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning). 2012. Developing an Institutional Framework for Supporting Supervisors of Research Students. A Practical Guide. http://www.nairtl.ie/workgroupDocs/SupervisorSupport_Guide.pdf
35. Park, C. 2005. “New Variant PhD: The Changing Nature of the Doctorate in the UK.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (2): 189–207. doi:10.1080/13600800500120068.
36. Parker, R. 2009. “A Learning Community Approach to Doctoral Education in the Social Sciences.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (1): 43–54. doi:10.1080/13562510802602533.
37. Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. (1990; 3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks & London: SAGE.
38. Petersen, E. B. 2007. “Negotiating Academicity: Postgraduate Research Supervision as Category Boundary Work.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 475–487. doi:10.1080/03075070701476167.
39. Pole, C. 1998. “Joint Supervision and the PhD: Safety Net or Panacea?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 23 (3): 259–271. doi:10.1080/0260293980230303
40. Samara, A. 2006. “Group Supervision in Graduate Education: A Process of Supervision Skill Development and Text Improvement.” Higher Education Research and Development 25 (2): 115–129. doi:10.1080/07294360600610362.
41. Shulman, L. S. 2005. “Signature Pedagogies in the Professions.” Daedalus 134 (3): 52–59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015.
42. Sinclair, M. 2004. “The Pedagogy of ‘Good’ PhD Supervision: A National Cross-Disciplinary Investigation of PhD Supervision, DEST.” Accessed at dest.gov.au http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/07C6492B-F1BE-45C6-A2836098B6952D29/2536/phd_supervision.pdf
43. Thomas, S. L., and B. S. Malau-Aduli. 2013. “New International Academics’ Narratives of Cross-Cultural Transition.” International Journal of Higher Education 2 (2): 35–52. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p35.
44. Watts, J. H. 2010. “Team Supervision of the Doctorate: Managing Roles, Relationships and Contradictions.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (3): 325–329. doi:10.1080/13562511003740908.
45. Wisker, G., G. Robinson, and M. Shacham. 2007. “Postgraduate Research Success: Communities of Practice Involving Cohorts, Guardian Supervisors and Online Communities.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44 (3): 301–320. doi:10.1080/14703290701486720.