An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications

Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 311-325

  Gatfield, Terry ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Management styles; Research supervisory styles; Supervision; Supervision grid; Supervisory practices

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844592274     PISSN: 1360080X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600800500283585     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Altbach, P. G., Kelly, D. H., & Lulat, T. (1993). Research on foreign students and international study. Prager: New York.
2. Alpert, F., & Eyssell, T. H. (1995). Getting the most form your doctoral program: Advice for the Ph.D. student in finance. Journal of Financial Education, 21, 12-20.
3. Anderson, J. (1988). The supervisory process in speech, language pathology and audiology. Boston: College Hill Press.
4. Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
5. Callaghan, R. E., Fleenor, C. P., & Knudson, H. R. (1986). Understanding organizational behaviour. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
6. Carpenter, D. R., & Hudacek, S. (1996). On doctoral education in nursing: the voice of the student. New York: National League for Nursing Press.
7. Davis, G. B., & Barker, C. A. (1979). Writing the doctoral dissertation: A systematic approach. New York: Barron's Educational Series, Inc..
8. Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (1997). Supervising the Ph.D.: A guide to success. Buckinham, England: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
9. Dick, R. (1990). Convergent interviewing. Brisbane, Australia: Interchange.
10. Ellis, M., & Dell, D. (1986). Dimensionality of supervisor roles: Supervisors' perceptions of supervision. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 33, 282-291.
11. Fiedler, F. E. (1972). Effects of leadership training and experience: A contingency model interpretation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 455-472.
12. Grant, B. (1999, July). Walking on a rackety bridge: mapping supervision. Paper presented at the HERDSA International Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
13. Gurr, G. M. (2001). Negotiating the rackety bridge - a dynamic model of aligning supervisory style with research student development. Higher Education and Research Development, 20(1), 81-92.
14. Haskins, C. H. (1966). The rise of universities. New York: Cornell.
15. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of organisational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Hogan, R. A. (1964). Issues and approaches in supervision. Psychotherapy, Theory Research and Practice, 1, 139-141.
17. Hunt, D. E. (1971). Matching models in education: The coordination of teaching methods with student characteristics. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
18. Macintyre, S. (1991). The meaning of the clever country. Universities Review, 34(1), 34-37.
19. McNall-Burns, E. (1973). Western civilizations. New York: Norton.
20. Stoltenberg, C. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counsellor complexity model. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 28, 59-65.
21. Department of Education, Science and Training. Selected Higher Education Statistics. (Various Years). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Printers.