Joint supervision practices in doctoral education - A student experience

Journal of Further and Higher Education

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 427-446

  Lahenius, Katja ^a   Ikävalko, Heini ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

doctoral education; joint supervision; qualitative research; students' experiences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901240308     PISSN: 0309877X     EISSN: 14699486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2012.706805     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abiddin, N. Z., and M. West. 2007. "Supervision practices for foreign graduate research students." American Journal of Applied Sciences 4 (6): 362-70.
2. Armstrong, S. J. 2004. "The impact of supervisors' cognitive styles on the quality of research supervision in management education." British Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 599-616.
3. Barnes, B., and A. Austin. 2009. "The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor's perspective." Innovative Higher Education 33 (5): 297-315.
4. Bitusikova, A. 2009. Reforming doctoral education in Europe. Academe Online 95, no. 1. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2009/JF/Feat/bitu.htm.
5. Burnett, P. C. 1999. "The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model." Counselor Education and Supervision 39 (1): 46-52.
6. Frame, I. A., and L. Allen. 2002. "A flexible approach to PhD research training." Quality Assurance in Education 10 (2): 98-103.
7. Frischer, J., and K. Larsson. 2000. "Laissez-faire in research education - an inquiry into a Swedish doctoral program." Higher Education Policy 13 ((June)): 131-55.
8. Gardner, S. K. 2008. "'What's too much and what's too little?': The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education." Journal of Higher Education 79 (3): 326-50.
9. Golde, C. M. 2005. "The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments". Journal of Higher Education 76 (6): 669-700.
10. Green, B. 2005. "Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision." Higher Education Research & Development 24 (2): 151-63.
11. Halse, C., and J. Malfroy. 2010. "Retheorizing Doctoral Supervision as Professional Work." Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 79-92.
12. Hein, S., and G. Lawson. 2008. "Triadic supervision and its impact on the role of the supervisor: A qualitative examination of supervisors' perspectives." Counselor Education & Supervision 48 (1): 16-31.
13. Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. "Three approaches to qualitative content analysis." Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277-88.
14. Insch, G. S., J. E. Moore, and L. D. Murphy. 1997. "Content analysis in leadership research: Examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use." Leadership Quarterly 8 (1): 1-25.
15. Ives, G., and G. Rowley. 2005. "Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students' progress and outcomes." Studies in Higher Education 30 (5): 535-55.
16. Kluever, R. C. 1997. "Students' attitudes toward the responsibilities and barriers in doctoral study." New Directions for Higher Education 1997 (99): 47-56.
17. Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Lee, A. 2008. "How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision." Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267-81.
19. Manathunga, C., and J. Goozée. 2007. "Challenging the dual assumption of the 'always/already' autonomous student and effective supervisor." Teaching in Higher Education 12 (3): 309-22.
20. Martinsuo, M., and V. Turkulainen. 2011. "Personal commitment, support, and progress in doctoral studies." Studies in Higher Education 36 (1): 103-20.
21. McAlpine, L., and J. Norton. 2006. "Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research." Higher Education Research & Development 25 (1): 3-17.
22. Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
23. Miles, M. B., and M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Patton, M. Q. 2002. In Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Pearson, M., and A. Brew. 2002. "Research training and supervision development." Studies in Higher Education 27 (2): 135-50.
26. Phillips, E.M., and D.S. Pugh. 2005. How to Get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. 4th ed., rev. and updated. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
27. Pole, C. 1998. "Joint supervision and the PhD: Safety net or panacea?" Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23 (3): 259-71.
28. Sambrook, S., J. Stewart, and C. Roberts. 2008. "Doctoral supervision... a view from above, below and the middle!." Journal of Further and Higher Education 32 (1): 71-84.
29. Spooner-Lane, R. S., D. J. Henderson, R. A. Price, and G. W. Hill. 2007. "Practice to theory: Co-supervision stories." International Journal of Research Supervision 1 (1): 39-51.
30. Tesch, R. 1990. Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. London: Routledge.
31. Vilkinas, T. 2008. "An exploratory study of the supervision of Ph.d./research students' theses." Innovative Higher Education 32 (5): 297-311.
32. Walker, G. E., C. M. Golde, L. Jones, A. Conklin Bueschel, and P. Hutchings. 2008. The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Wisker, G., G. Robinson, and M. Shacham. 2007. "Postgraduate research success: communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities." Innovations in Education & Teaching International 44 (3): 301-20.
34. Zhao, F. 2003. "Transforming quality in research supervision: A knowledge-management approach". Quality in Higher Education 9 (2): 187-97.