Rhizomatic research cultures, writing groups and academic researcher identities

International Journal of Doctoral Studies

Volumn 8, Issue , 2013, Pages 137-150

  Guerin, Cally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Academic identities; Doctoral writing groups; Interdisciplinar ity; Research cultures; Rhizomatic knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888154645     PISSN: 15568881     EISSN: 15568873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.28945/1897     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adkins, B. (2009). PhD pedagogy and the changing knowledge landscapes of universities. Higher Educa-tion Research & Development, 28(2), 165-177.
2. Althusser, L. (2008). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. On Ideology, (pp. 1-60). (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: Verso. (Originally published in 1970.).
3. Amorim, A., & Ryan, C. (2005). Deleuze, action research and rhizomatic growth. Educational Action Re-search, 13(4), 581-593.
4. Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 807-827.
5. Barnacle, R. (2005). Research education ontologies: Exploring doctoral becoming. Higher Education Re-search & Development, 24(2), 179-188. (Pubitemid 40727538)
6. Barnacle, R., & Mewburn, I. (2010). Learning networks and the journey of 'becoming doctor'. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 433-444.
7. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University & Society for Research into Higher Educa-tion.
8. Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4-18. (Pubitemid 43246145)
9. Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). 'Peer learning' as pedagogic discourse for research education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 501-516. (Pubitemid 41441510)
10. Boud, D., & Tennant, M. (2006). Putting doctoral education to work: Challenges to academic practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(3), 293-306.
11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychol-ogy, 3(2), 77-101.
12. Brew, A., Boud, D., & Namgung, S. U. (2011). Influences on the formation of academics: The role of the doctorate and structured development opportunities. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 51-66.
13. Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (Eds). (2010). Tackling wicked problems through the transdis-ciplinary imagination. Abingdon, UK: Earthscan.
14. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of 'sex'. New York and London: Routledge.
15. Costley, C., & Lester, S. (2012). Work-based doctorates: Professional extension at the highest levels. Stud-ies in Higher Education, 37(3), 257-269.
16. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. B. Mas-sumi. London: Athlone Press. (Original work published 1980.).
17. Denholm, C. & Evans, T. (Eds.). (2006). Doctorates downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Aus-tralian and New Zealand. Camberwell, VIC: ACER.
18. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks & London: Sage.
19. Devos, A. (2004). The project of self, the project of others: Mentoring, women and the fashioning of the academic subject. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 67-80. (Pubitemid 38597929)
20. Evans, D., Gruba, P., & Zobel, J. (2011). How to write a better thesis. Carlton, Vic: Melbourne University Press.
21. Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.) Thousand Oaks & London: Sage.
22. Gardner, S. K., Jansujwicz, J., Hutchins, K., Cline, B., & Levesque, V. (2012). Interdisciplinary doctoral student socialization. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 377-394. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume7/ IJDSv7p377-394Gardner0385.pdf.
23. Grellier, J. (2013). Rhizomatic mapping: Spaces for learning in higher education. Higher Education Re-search and Development, 32(1), 83-95.
24. Guerin, C., Xafis, V., Doda, D.V., Gillam, M., Larg, A., Luckner, H., Jahan, N., Widayati, A. & Xu, C. (2013) Diversity in collaborative research communities: A multicultural, multidisciplinary thesis writ-ing group in Public Health. Studies in Continuing Education 35(1): 65-81. DOI:10.1080/0158037X.2012. 684375.
25. Harman, K. M. (2004). Producing 'industry-ready' doctorates: Australian Cooperative Research Centre approaches to doctoral education. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(3), 387-404. (Pubitemid 39414804)
26. Hopwood, N. (2010). A sociocultural view of doctoral students' relationships and agency. Studies in Con-tinuing Education, 32(2), 103-117.
27. Hyland, J. (2008). Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. Journal of English Text Construc-tion, 1(1), 5-22.
28. Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. New York and London: Routledge.
29. Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187-200. (Pubitemid 36419832)
30. Lee, A., & Danby, S. (Eds). (2012). Reshaping doctoral education: International approaches and pedago-gies. London: Routledge.
31. Le Grange, L. L. L. (2011). Sustainability and higher education: From arborescent to rhizomatic thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(7), 742-754. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00503.x.
32. McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63-74.
33. McCulloch, A., & Thomas, L. (2012). Widening participation to doctoral education and research degrees: A research agenda for an emerging policy issue. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 214-227. DOI:10.1080/07294360.2012.662630.
34. Miller, N., & Brimicombe, A. (2004). Mapping research journeys across complex terrain with heavy bag-gage. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(3), 405-417.
35. Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
36. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks & London: Sage.
37. Pearson, M., Evans, T., & Macauley, P. (2008). Growth and diversity in doctoral education: Assessing the Australian experience. Higher Education, 55, 357-372.
38. Pearson, M., Cumming, J., Evans, T., Macauley, P., & Ryland, K. (2011). How shall we know them? Cap-turing the diversity of difference in Australian doctoral candidates and their experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 527-542 .
39. Petersen, E. B. (2007). Negotiating academicity: Postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 475-487.
40. Petre, M., & Rugg, G. (2010). The unwritten rules of PhD research. (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
41. Pilbeam, C., & Denyer, D. (2009). Lone scholar or community member? The role of student networks in doctoral education in a UK management school. Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 301-318.
42. Rizvi, F. (2010). International students and doctoral studies in transnational spaces. In M. Walker & P. Thomson (Eds), The Routledge doctoral supervisor's companion: Supporting effective research in education and the social sciences (pp. 158-70). London: Routledge.
43. Robinson-Pant, A. (2010). Internationalisation of higher education: Challenges for the doctoral supervisor. In M. Walker & P. Thomson (Eds), The Routledge doctoral supervisor's companion: Supporting effec-tive research in education and the social sciences (pp. 147-57). London: Routledge.
44. Ryan, C., Amorim, A. C., & Kusch, J. (2010). Writing ourselves reflectively. Reflective Practice: Interna-tional and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 11(2), 115-125.
45. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
46. Smagorinsky, P., Augustine, S. M., & Gallas, K. (2006). Rethinking rhizomes in writing about research. The Teacher Educator, 42(2), 87-105.
47. Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed). Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 20. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
48. Taylor, C., Downs, Y., Baker, R., & Chikwa, G. (2011). 'I did it my way': Voice, visuality and identity in doctoral students' reflexive videonarratives on their doctoral research journeys. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 34(2), 193-210.
49. Thomson, P., & Walker, M. (Eds). (2010). The Routledge doctoral student's companion: Supporting effec-tive research in education and the social sciences. London: Routledge.
50. Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 305-316 .
51. Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (Eds). (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st century: Rethink-ing the significance of disciplines in higher education (International Studies in Higher Education). Ab-ingdon, UK: Routledge.
52. Wallace, M., & Wray, A. (2006). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.