Joint supervision and the PhD: Safety net or panacea?

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 259-271

  Pole, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956025144     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293980230303     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. BURGESS, R. G., HOCKEY, J. & POLE, C. (1992) Becoming a Postgraduate Science Student. ESRC End of Award Report, reference no: T007401011 (Swindon, ESRC).
2. BURGESS, R. G. (Ed.) (1994) Postgraduate Education and Training in the Social Sciences: processes and products (London, Jessica Kingsley).
3. BURGESS, R. G., POLE, C. J. & HOCKEY, J. (1994) Strategies for managing and supervising the social science PhD, in: R. G. BURGESS (Ed.) Postgraduate Education and Training in the Social Sciences: processes and products (London, Jessica Kingsley).
4. CRYER, P. (1996) The Research Student's Guide to Success (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
5. DELAMONT, S. & EGGLESTON, J. (1983) A necessary isolation?, in: J. EGGLESTON & S. DELAMONT (Eds) Supervision of Students for Research Degrees (Birmingham, BERA).
6. ELTON, L. & POPE, M. (1989) Research supervision: the value of collegiality, Cambridge Journal of Education, 19, pp. 267-275.
7. ESRC (1991) Postgraduate Training Guidelines (Swindon, ESRC).
8. ESRC (1994) ESRC Studentship Handbook (Swindon, ESRC).
9. HMSO (1993) Realising our Potential -- Strategy for Science Engineering and Technology. White Paper (London, HMSO).
10. HMSO (1995) Progress through Partnership: Report from the Steering Group of The Technology Foresight Programme (London, Office of Science and Technology).
11. HOCKEY, J. (1994) New territory: problems of adjusting to the first year of a social science PhD, Studies in Higher Education, 19, pp. 177-190.
12. HOCKEY, J. (1995a) Getting too close: a problem and possible solution in social science PhD supervision, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 23(2), pp. 199-210.
13. HOCKEY, J. (1995b) Change and the social science PhD: supervisors' responses, Oxford Review of Education, 21(2), pp. 195-206.
14. HOCKEY, J. (1996) Strategies and tactics in the supervision of UK social science PhD students, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, pp. 481-500.
15. NATIONAL POSTGRADUATE COMMITTEE (1995) Guidelines for the Conduct of Research Degree Appeals (Troon, Ayrshire, Brandon House).
16. PARRY, O., ATKINSON, P. & DELAMONT, S. (1994) Disciplinary identities and doctoral work, in: R. BURGESS (Ed.) Postgraduate Education and Training in the Social Sciences (London, Jessica Kingsley).
17. PHILLIPS, E. M. & PUGH, D. S. (1994) How to Get a PhD, 2nd edition (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
18. POLE, C., SPROKKEREEF, A. & BURGESS, R. (1997) Supervision of doctoral students in the natural sciences: expectations and experiences, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), pp. 49-64.
19. ROBBINS, LORD (1963) Higher Education, CMND 2154 (London, HMSO).
20. SERC (1992) Research Student and Supervisor: an approach to good supervisor practice (Swindon, SERC).
21. Swinnerton-Dyer, P. (1982) Report of the Working Party on Postgraduate Education (London, HMSO).
22. WINFIELD, G. (1987) The Social Science PhD, The ESRC Enquiry on Submission Rates. The Report (London, ESRC).
23. WRIGHT, J. & LODWICK, R. (1989) The process of the PhD: a study of the first year of doctoral study, Research Papers in Education, 4, pp. 22-56.