On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 952-964

  Abla, Dilshat ^a,b,e   Katahira, Kentaro ^a,c,d   Okanoya, Kazuo ^a,b,c  

^a RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^e XINJIANG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 44449131435     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20058     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321-324.
2. Brent, M. R. (1999). Speech segmentation and word discovery: A computational perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 294-301.
3. Brent, M. R., & Cartwright, T. A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61, 93-125.
4. Christiansen, M. H., Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: A connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 221-268.
5. Christophe, A., Dupoux, E., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1994). Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1570-1580.
6. Cunillera, T., Toro, J. M., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2006). The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1123, 168-178.
7. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604.
8. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 458-467.
9. Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 178-186.
10. Goodsitt, J. V., Morgan, J. L., & Kuhl, P. K. (1993). Perceptual strategies in speech segmentation. Journal of Child Language, 20, 229-252.
11. Hauser, M. D., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: Statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 78, 53-64.
12. Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words influent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1-23.
13. Kim, M. S., Kim, J. J., & Kwon, J. S. (2001). The effect of immediate and delayed word repetition on event-related potential in a continuous recognition task. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 387-396.
14. Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, 35-42.
15. Kooijman, V., Hagoort, P., & Cutler, A. (2005). Electrophysiological evidence for prelinguistic infants' word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 109-116.
16. Korzyukov, O., Alho, K., Kujala, A., Gumenyuk, V., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Virtanen, J., et al. (1999). Electromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex generated by sensory-memory based processing of tone-frequency changes. Neuroscience Letters, 276, 169-172.
17. Kutas, M., & Iragui, V. (1998). The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 456-471.
18. McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703-704.
19. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
21. Pena, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2002). Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298, 604-607.
22. Petten, C. V., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interaction between sentence context and word frequency in event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380-393.
23. Phillips, N. A., Klein, D., Mercier, J., & de Boysson, C. (2006). ERP measures of auditory word repetition and translation priming in bilinguals. Brain Research, 1125, 116-131.
24. Pons, F. (2006). The effects of distributional learning on rats' sensitivity to phonetic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 97-101.
25. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
26. Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27-52.
27. Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621.
28. Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2003a). An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 228-240.
29. Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2003b). An ERP study of continuous speech processing: II. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in non-native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 214-227.
30. Sanders, L. D., Newport, E. L., & Neville, H. J. (2002). Segmentation nonsense: An event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 700-703.
31. Seidenberg, M. S., MacDonald, M. C., & Saffran, J. R. (2002). Does grammar start where statistics stop? Science, 298, 553-554.
32. Toro, J. M., Sinnett, S., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2005). Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention. Cognition, 97, B25-B34.
33. Toro, J. M., & Trobalón, J. B. (2005). Statistical computations over a speech stream in a rodent. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 867-875.
34. Turk-Browne, N. B., Junge, J., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552-564.
35. Vasey, M. W., & Thayer, J. F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate resolution. Psychophysiology, 24, 479-486.