Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 93, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 943-949

  Opdam, N J M ^a   Van De Sande, F H ^b   Bronkhorst, E ^a   Cenci, M S ^b   Bottenberg, P ^c   Pallesen, U ^d   Gaengler, P ^e   Lindberg, A ^f   Huysmans, M C D N J M ^a   Van Dijken, J W ^f  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^c VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^f UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

clinical outcomes; clinical studies trials; operative dentistry; resin based composite materials; restorative materials; risk factor(s)

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; RESIN;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; STANDARDS; SURVIVAL; TIME;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES SUSCEPTIBILITY; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84907509367     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: 15440591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034514544217     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Am J Dent. 2004 ; 17: 43-50
2. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 ; 138: 775-783
3. Bottenberg P, Jacquet W, Alaerts M, Keulemans F. A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: five-year results. J Dent. 2009 ; 37: 198-203
4. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, Loguercio AD, Moraes RR, Bronkhorst EM, et al. 22-year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater. 2011 ; 27: 955-963
5. De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 ; 113: 77-82
6. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012 ; 28: 87-101
7. Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Carvalho CA, Franco EB, van Dijken JW, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: a five-year follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 ; 140: 447-454
8. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent. 2001 ; 3: 185-194
9. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012 ; 14: 407-431
10. Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009 ; 34: 11-17
11. Köhler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent. 2000 ; 28: 111-116
12. Krämer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Feilzer AJ, Frankenberger R. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years. Dent Mater. 2011 ; 27: 455-464
13. Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. J Dent. 2007 ; 35: 124-129
14. Lundin SA, Koch G. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years. Swed Dent J. 1999 ; 23: 165-171
15. Lynch CD, Opdam NJ, Hickel R, Brunton PA, Gurgan S, Kakaboura A, et al. Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section: guidance on the use of resin composites for direct restoration of posterior teeth. J Dent. 2014 ; 42: 377-383
16. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int. 1998 ; 29: 483-490
17. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004 ; 29: 481-508
18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 ; 6: e1000097
19. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int. 1998 ; 29: 5-11
20. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007 ; 9: 469-475
21. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res. 2010 ; 89: 1063-1067
22. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003 ; 7: 71-79
23. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW, Halken J, Hallonsten AL, Höigaard R. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up. J Dent. 2013 ; 41: 297-306
24. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yücel T, et al. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent. 1996 ; 9: 167-173
25. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NH. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent. 1999 ; 27: 13-19
26. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SA. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results. Swed Dent J. 1995 ; 19: 173-182
27. Van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Cenci MS. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res. 2013 ; 92: 78S - 83S
28. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000 ; 28: 299-306
29. van Dijken JW. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up. J Dent. 2010 ; 38: 469-474
30. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. Dent Mater. 2011a ; 27: 150-156
31. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Four-year clinical evaluation of Class II nano-hybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. J Dent. 2011b ; 39: 16-25
32. van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities. J Dent. 2006 ; 34: 763-769
33. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent. 2003 ; 31: 395-405
34. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent. 2000 ; 28: 375-382
35. Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent. 1999 ; 11: 135-142
36. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Celis JP, Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater. 1992 ; 8: 310-319