Ultrasound treatment increases transfection efficiency of low molecular weight chitosan in fibroblasts but not in KB cells

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Kedjarune Leggat, Ureporn ^a   Supaprutsakul, Chanyapat ^a   Chotigeat, Wilaiwan ^a  

^a PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHITOSAN DERIVATIVE; LIPOFECTAMINE; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT CHITOSAN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHITOSAN; DNA; LUCIFERASE; MICROSPHERE;

ARTICLE; CELL STRAIN KB; COMPLEX FORMATION; CYTOTOXICITY; DEACETYLATION; DEPOLYMERIZATION; DNA BINDING; FIBROBLAST; GENE DELIVERY SYSTEM; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LOW FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MTT ASSAY; PARTICLE SIZE; PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; TOOTH PULP; ULTRASOUND; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGAR GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; CELL DEATH; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; KB CELL LINE; MALE; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CELL DEATH; CELL LINE; CHITOSAN; DENTAL PULP; DNA; ELECTROPHORESIS, AGAR GEL; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; KB CELLS; LUCIFERASES; MALE; MICROSPHERES; MIDDLE AGED; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT; STATIC ELECTRICITY; TRANSFECTION; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 84907282225     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092076     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Dang JM, Leong KW (2006) Natural polymers for gene delivery and tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58: 487-499. (Pubitemid 43928168)
2. Baldrick P (2010) The safety of chitosan as a pharmaceutical excipient. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 56: 290-299.
3. Wang JJ, Zeng ZW, Xiao RZ, Xie T, Zhou GL, et al. (2011) Recent advances of chitosan nanoparticles as drug carriers. Int J Nanomedicine 6: 765-774.
4. Shi C, Zhu Y, Ran X, Wang M, Su Y, et al. (2006) Therapeutic potential of chitosan and its derivatives in regenerative medicine. J Surg Res 133: 185-192.
5. Duceppe N, Tabrizian M (2010) Advances in using chitosan-based nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo drug and gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 7: 1191-1207.
6. Thibault M, Nimesh S, Lavertu M, Buschmann MD (2010) Intracellular trafficking and decondensation kinetics of chitosan-pDNA polyplexes. Mol Ther 18: 1787-1795.
7. Hsu SH, Ho TT, Tseng TC (2012) Nanoparticle uptake and gene transfer efficiency for MSCs on chitosan and chitosan-hyaluronan substrates. Biomaterials 33: 3639-3650.
8. Bernkop-Schnurch A, Dunnhaupt S (2012) Chitosan-based drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm.
9. Ramesan RM, Sharma CP (2012) Modification of chitosan nanoparticles for improved gene delivery. Nanomedicine (Lond) 7: 5-8.
10. Erbacher P, Zou S, Bettinger T, Steffan AM, Remy JS (1998) Chitosan-based vector/DNA complexes for gene delivery: biophysical characteristics and transfection ability. Pharm Res 15: 1332-1339. (Pubitemid 28427918)
11. Turan K, Nagata K (2006) Chitosan-DNA nanoparticles: the effect of cell type and hydrolysis of chitosan on in vitro DNA transfection. Pharm Dev Technol 11: 503-512. (Pubitemid 44852432)
12. Douglas KL, Piccirillo CA, Tabrizian M (2008) Cell line-dependent internalization pathways and intracellular trafficking determine transfection efficiency of nanoparticle vectors. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 68: 676-687. (Pubitemid 351318216)
13. Mao S, Shuai X, Unger F, Simon M, Bi D, et al. (2004) The depolymerization of chitosan: effects on physicochemical and biological properties. Int J Pharm 281: 45-54. (Pubitemid 39024262)
14. Richardson SC, Kolbe HV, Duncan R (1999) Potential of low molecular mass chitosan as a DNA delivery system: biocompatibility, body distribution and ability to complex and protect DNA. Int J Pharm 178: 231-243. (Pubitemid 29078577)
15. Nimesh S, Thibault MM, Lavertu M, Buschmann MD (2010) Enhanced gene delivery mediated by low molecular weight chitosan/DNA complexes: effect of pH and serum. Mol Biotechnol 46: 182-196.
16. Zhu WL, Cheng HX, Han N, Liu DL, Zhu WX, et al. (2008) Messenger RNA expression of translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) in liver regeneration and cancer. Anticancer Res 28: 1575-1580. (Pubitemid 351892932)
17. Duceppe N, Tabrizian M (2009) Factors influencing the transfection efficiency of ultra low molecular weight chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles. Biomaterials.
18. Alameh M, Dejesus D, Jean M, Darras V, Thibault M, et al. (2012) Low molecular weight chitosan nanoparticulate system at low N:P ratio for nontoxic polynucleotide delivery. Int J Nanomedicine 7: 1399-1414.
19. Supaprutsakul S, Chotigeat W, Wanichpakorn S, Kedjarune-Leggat U (2010) Transfection efficiency of depolymerized chitosan and epidermal growth factor conjugated to chitosan-DNA polyplexes. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21: 1553-1561.
20. Morris VB, Neethu S, Abraham TE, Pillai CK, Sharma CP (2008) Studies on the condensation of depolymerized chitosans with DNA for preparing chitosan-DNA nanoparticles for gene delivery applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.
21. Yuan QY, Huang J, Chu BC, Li XS, Si LY (2011) A visible, targeted highefficiency gene delivery and transfection strategy. BMC Biotechnol 11: 56.
22. Zhang L, Liu Y, Xiang G, Lv Q, Huang G, et al. (2011) Ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction in combination with cationic lipid microbubbles enhances gene delivery. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 31: 39-45.
23. Zhou S, Li S, Liu Z, Tang Y, Wang Z, et al. (2011) Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction mediated herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase gene treats hepatoma in mice. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29: 170.
24. Tang ES, Huang M, Lim LY (2003) Ultrasonication of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 265: 103-114. (Pubitemid 37176951)
25. Freshney RI (1985) Induction of differentiation in neoplastic cells. Anticancer Res 5: 111-130.
26. Huang M, Khor E, Lim LY (2004) Uptake and cytotoxicity of chitosan molecules and nanoparticles: effects of molecular weight and degree of deacetylation. Pharm Res 21: 344-353. (Pubitemid 38221982)
27. Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65: 55-63.
28. Thibault M, Astolfi M, Tran-Khanh N, Lavertu M, Darras V, et al. (2011) Excess polycation mediates efficient chitosan-based gene transfer by promoting lysosomal release of the polyplexes. Biomaterials 32: 4639-4646.
29. Khalil IA, Kogure K, Akita H, Harashima H (2006) Uptake pathways and subsequent intracellular trafficking in nonviral gene delivery. Pharmacol Rev 58: 32-45.
30. Koping-Hoggard M, Mel'nikova YS, Varum KM, Lindman B, Artursson P (2003) Relationship between the physical shape and the efficiency of oligomeric chitosan as a gene delivery system in vitro and in vivo. J Gene Med 5: 130-141. (Pubitemid 40309690)
31. Saito A, Miyashita K, Biukovic G, Schrempf H (2001) Characteristics of a Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) extracellular protein targeting chitin and chitosan. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 1268-1273. (Pubitemid 33643570)
32. Buschmann MD, Merzouki A, Lavertu M, Thibault M, Jean M, et al. (2013) Chitosans for delivery of nucleic acids. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65: 1234-1270.
33. Mao S, Sun W, Kissel T (2010) Chitosan-based formulations for delivery of DNA and siRNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62: 12-27.
34. Romoren K, Pedersen S, Smistad G, Evensen O, Thu BJ (2003) The influence of formulation variables on in vitro transfection efficiency and physicochemical properties of chitosan-based polyplexes. Int J Pharm 261: 115-127. (Pubitemid 36962750)
35. Zhao X, Yu SB, Wu FL, Mao ZB, Yu CL (2006) Transfection of primary chondrocytes using chitosan-pEGFP nanoparticles. J Control Release 112: 223-228.
36. Izumisawa T, Hattori Y, Date M, Toma K, Maitani Y (2011) Cell line-dependent internalization pathways determine DNA transfection efficiency of decaarginine-PEG-lipid. Int J Pharm 404: 264-270.
37. Pua EC, Zhong P (2009) Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 28: 64-75.
38. Phillips LC, Klibanov AL, Wamhoff BR, Hossack JA (2010) Targeted gene transfection from microbubbles into vascular smooth muscle cells using focused, ultrasound-mediated delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol 36: 1470-1480.
39. Bai WK, Wu ZH, Shen E, Zhang JZ, Hu B (2012) The improvement of liposome-mediated transfection of pEGFP DNA into human prostate cancer cells by combining low-frequency and low-energy ultrasound with microbubbles. Oncol Rep 27: 475-480.
40. Omata D, Negishi Y, Hagiwara S, Yamamura S, Endo-Takahashi Y, et al. (2012) Bubble liposomes and ultrasound promoted endosomal escape of TAT-PEG liposomes as gene delivery carriers. Mol Pharm 8: 2416-2423.
41. Komamura K, Tatsumi R, Tsujita-Kuroda Y, Onoe T, Matsumoto K, et al. (2011) Cellular Injury of Cardiomyocytes during Hepatocyte Growth Factor Gene Transfection with Ultrasound-Triggered Bubble Liposome Destruction. J Drug Deliv 2011: 453619.
42. Tripathi SK, Goyal R, Kashyap MP, Pant AB, Haq W, et al. (2012) Depolymerized chitosans functionalized with bPEI as carriers of nucleic acids and tuftsin-tethered conjugate for macrophage targeting. Biomaterials 33: 4204-4219.
43. Jreyssaty C, Shi Q, Wang H, Qiu X, Winnik FM, et al. (2012) Efficient Nonviral Gene Therapy Using Folate-Targeted Chitosan-DNA Nanoparticles In Vitro. ISRN Pharm 2012: 369270.