Nanoparticle uptake and gene transfer efficiency for MSCs on chitosan and chitosan-hyaluronan substrates

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 3639-3650

  Hsu, Shan hui ^a   Ho, Tung Tso ^a   Tseng, Ting Chen ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Chitosan; Endocytosis; Gene transfection; Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); Nanoparticles (NPs)

Indexed keywords

BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; CELL CULTURE SUBSTRATE; CELL VIABILITY; CELLULAR IMAGING; CYTOSKELETAL; ENDOCYTIC PATHWAYS; ENDOCYTOSIS; ENDOCYTOSIS PATHWAY; GENE DELIVERY; GENE TRANSFECTION; INTRACELLULAR UPTAKE; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; PLASMID DNA; PLASMID TRANSFECTION; STEM CELL LABELING; SURFACE-MODIFIED; TISSUE-CULTURE POLYSTYRENES; TRANSFECTION AGENTS; TRANSFER EFFICIENCY; TRANSGENE EXPRESSION;

BIOMOLECULES; CYTOLOGY; FLOWCHARTING; GENE THERAPY; GENE TRANSFER; IRON OXIDES; NANOPARTICLES; PARAMAGNETISM; POLYSTYRENES; STEM CELLS; SUBSTRATES; TISSUE CULTURE;

CHITOSAN;

CHITOSAN; CLATHRIN; HYALURONIC ACID; NANOPARTICLE; PLASMID DNA; POLYSTYRENE; RHOA GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CELL LABELING; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; ENDOCYTOSIS; GENE DELIVERY SYSTEM; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE TRANSFER; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; INTERNALIZATION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SPHEROID CELL; TISSUE CULTURE; TRANSGENE; UPREGULATION;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL SURVIVAL; CHITOSAN; ENDOCYTOSIS; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; HYALURONIC ACID; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; MATERIALS TESTING; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; NANOPARTICLES; PLASMIDS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SPHEROIDS, CELLULAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84857787614     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Thanh N.T.K., Green LaW. Functionalisation of nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Nano Today 2010, 5(3):213-230.
2. He C.B., Hu Y.P., Yin L.C., Tang C., Yin C.H. Effects of particle size and surface charge on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2010, 31(13):3657-3666.
3. Thorek D.L.J., Tsourkas A. Size, charge and concentration dependent uptake of iron oxide particles by non-phagocytic cells. Biomaterials 2008, 29(26):3583-3590.
4. Osaka T., Nakanishi T., Shanmugam S., Takahama S., Zhang H. Effect of surface charge of magnetite nanoparticles on their internalization into breast cancer and umbilical vein endothelial cells. Colloid Surf B 2009, 71(2):325-330.
5. Adler A.F., Leong K.W. Emerging links between surface nanotechnology and endocytosis: impact on nonviral gene delivery. Nano Today 2010, 5(6):553-569.
6. Mailander V., Landfester K. Interaction of nanoparticles with cells. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10(9):2379-2400.
7. Josephson L., Tung C.H., Moore A., Weissleder R. High-efficiency intracellular magnetic labeling with novel superparamagnetic-tat peptide conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 1999, 10(2):186-191.
8. Lewin M., Carlesso N., Tung C.H., Tang X.W., Cory D., Scadden D.T., et al. Tat peptide-derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18(4):410-414.
9. Moore A., Josephson L., Bhorade R.M., Basilion J.P., Weissleder R. Human transferrin receptor gene as a marker gene for MR imaging. Radiology 2001, 221(1):244-250.
10. Ahrens E.T., Feili-Hariri M., Xu H., Genove G., Morel P.A. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of iron-oxide particles provides efficient labeling of dendritic cells for in vivo MR imaging. Magnet Reson Med 2003, 49(6):1006-1013.
11. Liu Z.H., Zhang Z.Y., Zhou C.R., Jiao Y.P. Hydrophobic modifications of cationic polymers for gene delivery. Prog Polym Sci 2010, 35(9):1144-1162.
12. Lorenz C., Hadwiger P., John M., Vornlocher H.P., Unverzagt C. Steroid and lipid conjugates of siRNAs to enhance cellular uptake and gene silencing in liver cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2004, 14(19):4975-4977.
13. Kedmi R., Ben-Arie N., Peer D. The systemic toxicity of positively charged lipid nanoparticles and the role of Toll-like receptor 4 in immune activation. Biomaterials 2010, 31(26):6867-6875.
14. Rea J.C., Gibly R.F., Davis N.E., Barron A.E., Shea L.D. Engineering surfaces for substrate-mediated gene delivery using recombinant proteins. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10(10):2779-2786.
15. Chen S., Zhuo R.X., Cheng S.X. Enhanced gene transfection with addition of a cell-penetrating peptide in substrate-mediated gene delivery. J Gene Med 2010, 12(8):705-713.
16. Pannier A.K., Anderson B.C., Shea L.D. Substrate-mediated delivery from self-assembled monolayers: effect of surface ionization, hydrophilicity, and patterning. Acta Biomater 2005, 1(5):511-522.
17. Wang C.H.K., Pun S.H. Substrate-mediated nucleic acid delivery from self-assembled monolayers. Trends Biotechnol 2011, 29(3):119-126.
18. Shiu J.Y., Kuo C.W., Whang W.T., Chen P.L. Observation of enhanced cell adhesion and transfection efficiency on superhydrophobic surfaces. Lab on a Chip 2010, 10(5):556-558.
19. Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 2006, 31(7):603-632.
20. Boca S.C., Potara M., Toderas F., Stephan O., Baldeck P.L., Astilean S. Uptake and biological effects of chitosan-capped gold nanoparticles on Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater 2011, 31(2):184-189.
21. Hu Y.L., Qi W., Han F., Shao J.Z., Gao J.Q. Toxicity evaluation of biodegradable chitosan nanoparticles using a zebrafish embryo model. Int J Nanomed 2011, 6(1):3351-3359.
22. Huang G.S., Dai L.G., Yen B.L., Hsu S.H. Spheroid formation of mesenchymal stem cells on chitosan and chitosan-hyaluronan membranes. Biomaterials 2011, 32(29):6929-6945.
23. Wang W.J., Itaka K., Ohba S., Nishiyama N., Chung U.I., Yamasaki Y., et al. 3D spheroid culture system on micropatterned substrates for improved differentiation efficiency of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2009, 30(14):2705-2715.
24. Bhang S.H., Cho S.W., La W.G., Lee T.J., Yang H.S., Sun A.Y., et al. Angiogenesis in ischemic tissue produced by spheroid grafting of human adipose-derived stromal cells. Biomaterials 2011, 32(11):2734-2747.
25. 4 nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2007, 80(2):333-341.
26. Chang J.C., Hsu S.H., Chen D.C. The promotion of chondrogenesis in adipose-derived adult stem cells by an RGD-chimeric protein in 3D alginate culture. Biomaterials 2009, 30(31):6265-6275.
27. Wang L.H., Rothberg K.G., Anderson R.G.W. Mis-assembly of clathrin lattices on endosomes reveals a regulatory switch for coated pit formation. J Cell Biol 1993, 123(5):1107-1117.
28. Aoki T., Nomura R., Fujimoto T. Tyrosine phosphorylation of caveolin-1 in the endothelium. Exp Cell Res 1999, 253(2):629-636.
29. Liu P.S., Anderson R.G.W. Spatial organization of EGF receptor transmodulation by PDGF. Biochem Bioph Res Co 1999, 261(3):695-700.
30. Araki N., Hamasaki M., Egami Y., Hatae T. Effect of 3-methyladenine on the fusion process of macropinosomes in EGF-stimulated A431 cells. Cell Struct Funct 2006, 31(2):145-157.
31. Kruth H.S., Jones N.L., Huang W., Zhao B., Ishii I., Chang J., et al. Macropinocytosis is the endocytic pathway that mediates macrophage foam cell formation with native low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem 2005, 280(3):2352-2360.
32. Jing Y., Mal N., Williams P.S., Mayorga M., Penn M.S., Chalmers J.J., et al. Quantitative intracellular magnetic nanoparticle uptake measured by live cell magnetophoresis. Faseb J 2008, 22(12):4239-4247.
33. Gheisari Y., Soleimani M., Azadmanesh K., Zeinali S. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: optimization and comparison of five cationic polymer-based gene delivery methods. Cytotherapy 2008, 10(8):815-823.
34. Cukierman E., Pankov R., Stevens D.R., Yamada K.M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294:1708-1712.
35. Kirkham M., Parton R.G. Clathrin-independent endocytosis: new insights into caveolae and non-caveolar lipid raft carriers. Bba-Mol Cell Res 2005, 1746(3):349-363.
36. Bourguignon L.Y.W. Hyaluronan-mediated CD44 activation of RhoGTPase signaling and cytoskeleton function promotes tumor progression. Semin Cancer Biol 2008, 18(4):251-259.
37. Vachon E., Martin R., Plumb J., Kwok V., Vandivier R.W., Glogauer M., et al. CD44 is a phagocytic receptor. Blood 2006, 107(10):4149-4158.
38. De La Fuente M., Seijo B., Alonso M.J. Novel hyaluronic acid-chitosan nanoparticles for ocular gene therapy. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 2008, 49(5):2016-2024.
39. Lee J.L., Wang M.J., Sudhir P.R., Chen J.Y. CD44 engagement promotes matrix-derived survival through the CD44-Src-integrin axis in lipid rafts. Mol Cell Biol 2008, 28(18):5710-5723.