Measuring factors influencing valuation of nonmotorized improvement measures

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 67, Issue , 2014, Pages 195-211

  Ruiz, Tomás ^a   Bernabé, José C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b Gerencia Municipal de Urbanismo   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cycling improvement measures; Nonmotorized transportation; Travel data collection method

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; SURVEYS; TRAVEL TIME;

CONTINGENT VALUATIONS; DATA COLLECTION; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; IMPROVEMENT MEASURE; ORDERED PROBIT MODEL; RANDOM PARAMETERS; SENIOR CITIZENS; TRANSPORTATION MODE;

NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION;

CYCLE TRANSPORT; JOURNEY TO WORK; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION; FUTURE PROSPECT; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 84907061002     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Abraham J.E., McMillan S., Brownlee A.T., Hunt J.D. Investigation of cyclingsensitivities. 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2002, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
2. Abraham, J., McMillan, S., Brownlee, A., Hunt, J.D., 2004. Investigation of cycling sensitivities. In: Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
3. Akar G., Clifton K.J. Influence of individual perceptions and bicycle infrastructure on decision to bike. Transp. Res. Rec. 2009, 2140:165-172.
4. Banister C., Gallant N. Sustainable commuting: a contradiction in terms?. Reg. Stud. 1999, 33(3):274-280.
5. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann W.M., Hanley N.D., Hett T., Jones-Lee M.W., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques 2002, Edward Elgar, MA.
6. Bergström A., Magnusson R. Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter. Transp. Res. Part A 2003, 37:649-666.
7. Betz C.J., Bergstrom J.C., Bowker J.M. A contingent trip model for estimating rail-trail demand. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 2003, 46(1):79-96.
8. Blanco H., Alberti M., Forsyth A., Krizek K.J., Rodriguez D.A., Talen E., Ellis C. Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: emerging research agendas in planning. Prog. Plann. 2009, 71:153-205.
9. Boumans, A., Harms, L., 2004. Part-time employment and travel patterns of women in the Netherlands. In: Paper presented at Conference on Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Chicago, IL, 18-20 November.
10. Bovy P.H.L., Bradley M.A. Route choice analyzed with stated preference approaches. Transp. Res. Rec. 1985, 1037:11-20.
11. Brandenburg C., Matzarakis A., Arnberger A. The effects of weather on frequencies of use by commuting and recreation bicyclists. Advances Tourism Climatology 2004, 12:189-197.
12. Cambridge Systematics, I., 1996. Travel Survey Manual. Federal Highway Administration.
13. Cervero R. California's transit village movement. J. Pub. Transp. 1996, 1(1):103-130.
14. Cervero R., Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity and design. Transp. Res. Part D 1997, 2:199-219.
15. Cervero R., Radisch C. Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighbourhoods. Transp. Policy 1996, 3:127-141.
16. Chatterjee K., Sherwin H., Jain J. Triggers for changes in cycling: the role of life events and modifications to the external environment. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 30:183-193.
17. Davies, D., Halliday, M.E., Mayes, M., Pocock, R.L., 1997. Attitudes to cycling: a qualitative study and conceptual framework. TRL Report 226. Crowthorne: TRL.
18. Davies, A., Laing, R., Miller, D., Chen, W., Horne, P., Morrice, J., Scott, S., 2002. Streetscapes: their contribution to wealth creation and quality of life. Final Report. (accessed 30.07.10). http://www.rgu.ac.uk/sss/research/page.cfm?pge=2532.
19. Dickinson J.E., Kingham S., Copsey S., Hougie D.J.P. Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK?. Transp. Res. Part D 2003, 8(1):53-67.
20. Dill J., Carr T. Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transp. Res. Rec. 2003, 1828:116-123.
21. Dill J., Voros K. Factors affecting bicycling demand: initial survey findings from the Portland region. Transp. Res. Rec. 2007, 2031:9-17.
22. Fix P., Loomis J. Comparing the economic value of mountain biking estimated using revealed and stated preference. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 1998, 41(2):227-236.
23. Forward, S., 1999. Modes of Transport of Short Journeys: Attitudes and Behavior of the Inhabitants of Gothenburg. VTI rapport 437A, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute.
24. Gärling T., Boe O., Golledge R.G. Determinants of thresholds for driving. Trans. Res. Rec. 2000, 1718:68-72.
25. Garrard J., Rose G., Lo S.K. Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. Prev. Med. 2008, 46(1):55-59.
26. Gatersleben B., Appleton K.M. Contemplating cycling to work: attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transp. Res. Part A 2007, 41(4):302-312.
27. Greene, W., 2012. Limdep Version 10.0. Econometric Modeling Guide. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software Inc.
28. Greenwald M.J., Boarnet M.G. Built environment as determinant of walking behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. 2001, 1780:33-42.
29. Guo J.Y., Bhat C.R., Copperman R.B. Effect of the built environment on motorized and non-motorized trip making: substitutive, complementary, or synergistic?. Transp. Res. Rec. 2007, 2010:1-11.
30. Guria J., Leung J., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G. The willingness to accept value of statistical life relative to the willingness to pay value: evidence and policy implications. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2005, 32:113-127.
31. Guthrie, N., Davies, D.G., Gardner, G., 2001. Cyclists' assessments of road and traffic conditions: the development of a cyclability index. TRL Report 490. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
32. Handy S., Weston L., Mokhtarian P.L. Driving by choice or necessity?. Transp. Res. Part A 2005, 39:183-203.
33. Hanley N., Mourato S., Wright R.E. Choice modeling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental evaluation?. J. Econ. Surv. 2001, 15(3):435-462.
34. Heinen E., van Wee B., Maat K. Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Transp. Rev. 2010, 30(1):9-96.
35. Heinizen R.R., Bridges J.F. Comparison of four contingent valuation methods to estimate the economic value of a pneumococcal vaccine in Bangladesh. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 2008, 24(4):481-487.
36. Hensher D. Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice. Transportation 1994, 21(2):107-133.
37. Hillman M. Curbing Shorter Car Journeys: Prioritising the Alternatives 1998, Friends of the Earth, London.
38. Hopkinson P.G., Wardman M. Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities. Transp. Policy 1996, 3:241-249.
39. Hunt J.D., Abraham J.E. Influences on bicycle use. Transportation 2007, 34:453-470.
40. Jensen S.U. How to obtain a healthy journey to school. Transp. Res. Part A 2008, 42:475-486.
41. Kelly C.E., Tight M.R., Page M.W., Hodgson F.C. Techniques for Assessing the Walkability of the Pedestrian Environment 2007, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
42. Kim S., Ulfarsson G.F. Curbing automobile use for sustainable transportation: analysis of mode choice on short home-based trips. Transportation 2008, 35(6):723-737.
43. Kitamura R., Mokhtarian P.L., Laidet L. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in de San Francisco Bay Area. Transp. Plann. Technol. 1997, 24(2):125-158.
44. Kocur, G., Adler, T., Hyman, W., Aunet, B., 1982. Guide to Forecasting Travel Demand with Direct Utility Assessment. Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Report UMTA-NH-11-0001-82-1.
45. Krizek K.J., Roland R. What is at the end of the road? Understanding discontinuities of on-street bicycle lanes in urban settings. Transp. Res. Part D 2005, 10:55-68.
46. Landis B.W., Vattikuti V., Brannick M. Real-time human perceptions: toward a bicyclist level of service. Transp. Res. Rec. 1997, 1578:119-126.
47. Lee-Gosselin, M.E.H., 1995. Scope and potential of interactive stated response data collection methods. In: Conference on Household Travel Surveys: New Concepts and Research Needs, pp. 115-133.
48. Lindsey G., Knaap G. Willingness to pay for urban greenway projects. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 1999, 65(3):297-313.
49. Litman, T.A., 2008. Valuing service quality improvements in transportation planning. In: Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers.
50. Lohmann G., Rölle D. Ich würde ja Rad fahren aber...!", Veränderungen der Verkehrsmittelnutzung von dem Hintergrund der ipsativen Handlungstheorie. ''I'd ride a bike but...!'', changes in transport use from the background of the ipsative theory of behaviour. Umweltpsychologie 2005, 9(1):46-61.
51. Loukopoulos P., Gärling T. Are car users too lazy to walk?. Transp. Res. Rec. 2005, 1926:206-211.
52. Mackerron G., Egerton C., Gaskell C., Parpia A., Mourato A. Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-) flying young adults in the UK. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1372-1381.
53. Mackett R.L. Why do people use their cars for short trips?. Transportation 2003, 30:329-349.
54. Martens K. Promoting bike-and-ride: the Dutch experience. Transp. Res. Part A 2007, 41:326-338.
55. Menghini G., Carrasco N., Schüssler N., Axhausen K.W. Route choice of cyclists in Zurich. Transp. Res. Part A 2010, 44:754-765.
56. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, 2004. Mobiliteitseffecten Lokale Fietsmaatregelen [Mobility effects of local bike actions]. Rotterdam: Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat [MinVenW].
57. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method 1989, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
58. Moudon A.V., Lee C., Cheadle A.D., Collier C.W., Johnson D., Schmid T.L., Weather R.D. Cycling and the built environment: a US perspective. Transp. Res. Part D 2005, 10:245-261.
59. Nankervis M. The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting. Transp. Res. Part A 1999, 33:417-431.
60. Noland R.B., Kunreuther H. Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips. Transp. Policy 1995, 2(1):67-79.
61. Ortúzar J.deD., Iacobelli A., Valeze C. Estimating the demand for a cycle-way network. Transp. Res. Part A 2000, 34:353-373.
62. Parkin J., Ryley T., Jones T. On barriers to cycling: an exploration of quantitative analyses. Cycling and Society 2007, 83-96. Ashgate, London. D. Horton, P. Rosen, P. Cox (Eds.).
63. Parkin J., Wardman M., Page M. Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation 2008, 35:93-109.
64. Pearce D., Özdemiroglu E., et al. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques 2002, Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London.
65. Plaut P.O. Non-motorized commuting in the US. Transp. Res. Part D 2005, 10:347-356.
66. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C. The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Change 1984, Dow Jones/Irwin, Homewood, IL.
67. Pucher J., Buehler R. Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transp. Policy 2006, 13(3):265-279.
68. Pucher J., Komanoff C., Schimek P. Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transp. Res. Part A 1999, 33(7/8):625-654.
69. Pucher J., Dill J., Handy S. Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev. Med. 2010, 50:106-125.
70. Räsänen M., Summala H. Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions: an in-depth study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 1998, 30(5):657-666.
71. Rastogi, R., 2009. Scale factor estimation using maximum information procedure. In: Presented at the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January 11-15.
72. Rastogi R. Willingness to shift to walk or bicycle for accessing suburban rail - a case study in Mumbai, India. J. Urban Plann. Develop. 2010, 136(3):3-10.
73. Rastogi R., Krishna Rao K.V. Survey design for studying transit access behavior in Mumbai City. India J. Transp. Eng. 2002, 128(1):68-79.
74. Rastogi R., Krishna Rao K.V. Defining transits accessibility with environmental inputs. Transp. Res. Part D 2003, 8(5):383-396.
75. Rietveld P., Daniel V. Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter. Transp. Res. Part A 2004, 38:531-550.
76. Rodríguez D.A., Joo J. The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transp. Res. Part D 2004, 9(2):151-173.
77. Rose G., Marfurt H. Travel behaviour change impacts of a major ride to work day event. Transp. Res. Part A 2007, 41:351-364.
78. Ryley T.J. Estimating cycling demand for the journey to work or study in West Edinburgh, Scotland. Transp. Res. Rec. 2006, 1982:87-193.
79. Saelesminde K. Cost-benefit analyses of walking and cycling track networks taking into account insecurity, health effects and external costs of motorized traffic. Transp. Res. Part A 2004, 41:351-364.
80. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. What affects commute mode choice: neighbourhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods. J. Transp. Geogr. 2005, 13:83-99.
81. Shriver K. Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behavior in four Austin neighborhoods. Transp. Res. Rec. 1997, 1578:64-75.
82. Sisiopiku V.P., Akin D. Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey data. Transp. Res. Part F 2003, 6:249-274.
83. Southworth M. Designing the walkable city. J. Urban Plann. Develop. 2005, 131(4):246-257.
84. Srinivasan S., Ferreira J. Travel behavior at the household level: understanding linkages with residential choice. Transp. Res. Part D 2002, 7:225-242.
85. Stangeby, I., 1997. Attitudes towards walking and cycling instead of using a car. TØI-Report 370. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
86. Stinson, M.A., Bhat, C.R., 2003. An analysis of commuter bicyclist route choice using stated preference survey. In: Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
87. Stinson M.A., Bhat C.R. Frequency of bicycle commuting: internet-based survey analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2004, 1878:122-130.
88. Stinson, M.A., Bhat, C.R., 2005. A Comparison of the Route Preferences of Experienced and Inexperienced Bicycle Commuters. In Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
89. Su J.G., Winters M., Nunes M., Brauer M. Designing a route planner to facilitate and promote cycling in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Transp. Res. Part A 2010, 44:495-505.
90. Taylor D., Mahmassani H. Analysis of stated preferences for intermodal bicycle-transit interfaces. Transp. Res. Rec. 1996, 1556:86-95.
91. Tilahun N.Y., Levinson D.M., Krizek K.J. Trails, lanes, or traffic: valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transp. Res. Part A 2007, 41(4):287-301.
92. Timperio A., Ball K., Salmon J., Roberts R., Giles-Corti B., Baur C.A., Crawford D. Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2006, 30(1):45-51.
93. Trawen, A., Hjalte, K., 2000. Conjoint analysis versus Contingent valuation: estimating risk values and death risk equivalents in road traffic. In: Presented at the European Transport Conference, Cambridge, September.
94. Twaddle H., Hall F., Bracic B. Latent bicycle commuting demand and the effects of gender on commuter cycling and accident rates. Transp. Res. Rec. 2010, 2190:28-36.
95. Vandenbulcke G., Dujardin C., Thomas I., de Geus B., Degraeuwe B., Meeusen R., Panis L.I. Cycle commuting in Belgium: spatial determinants and "re-cycling" strategies. Transp. Res. Part A 2011, 45:118-137.
96. Verplanken B., Aarts H., van Knippenberg A. Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 27(5):539-560.
97. WALCYNG, 1997. How to Enhance Walking and Cycling Instead of Shorter Car Trips and to Make these Modes Safer, (accessed 02.11.10). http://cordis.europa.eu/transport/src/walcyng.htm.
98. Walton, D., Sunseri, S., 2006. Impediments to walking as a mode choice (Land Transport New Zealand Research Report, No. 313). Lower Hutt: Opus International Consultants.
99. Walton, D., Sunseri, S., 2007. Impediments to walking as a mode choice. Land Transport NZ Research Report 329.
100. Wardman M., Hartfield R., Page M. The UK national cycling strategy: can improved facilities meet the targets?. Transp. Policy 1997, 4(2):123-133.
101. Wardman M., Tight M., Page M. Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transp. Res. Part A 2007, 41:339-350.
102. Witlox F., Tindemans H. Evaluating bicycle-car transport mode competitiveness in an urban environment: an activity-based approach. World Transp. Policy Pract. 2004, 10(4):32-42.
103. Xing Y., Handy S.L., Mokhtarian P.L. Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities. Transp. Res. Part D 2010, 15(2):73-81.
104. Yi, M., Feeney, K., Adams, D., García, C., Chandra, P., 2011. Valuing cycling - Evaluating the economic benefits of providing dedicated cycle ways at a strategic network level. In: Australasian Transport Research Forum 2011 Proceedings 28-30 September, Adelaide, Australia.
105. Zacharias J. Non-motorized transportation in four Shanghai districts. Int. Plann. Stud. 2005, 10(3-4):323-340.
106. Zahran S., Brody S.D., Maghelal P., Prelog A., Lacy M. Cycling and walking: explaining the spatial distribution of healthy modes of transportation in the United States. Transp. Res. Part D 2008, 13(7):62-470.