Estimating cycling demand for the journey to work or study in west Edinburgh, Scotland

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1982, 2006, Pages 187-193

  Ryley, Tim ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SURVEYING;

CYCLES; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; HOUSEHOLDS; MODEL ESTIMATION; POPULATION SEGMENTS; TRANSPORT POLICY;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 33947361515     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1982-24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Edinburgh Facts and Figures. Household Structure. City of Edinburgh Council, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1998.
2. Edinburgh's Census 2001 City Comparisons. City Development Department Research Section, City of Edinburgh Council, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2003.
3. Local Transport Strategy 2004-2007. City of Edinburgh Council, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2004.
4. Department of Transport. National Cycling Strategy. HMSO, London, 1996.
5. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone, The Government's White Paper on the Future of Transport. HMSO, London, 1998.
6. Gardner, G., and T. Ryley. Trip End Facilities for Cyclists. Transport Research Laboratory Report 309. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1997.
7. Davies, D. G., M. E. Halliday, M. Mayes, and R. L. Pocock. Attitudes to Cycling - A Qualitative Study and Conceptual Framework. Transport Research Laboratory Report 266. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1997.
8. Davies, D. G., S. Gray, G. Gardner, and G. Harland. A Quantitative Study of the Attitudes of Individuals to Cycling. Transport Research Laboratory Report 481. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 2001.
9. Polak, J., and P. Jones. Using Stated Preference Methods to Examine Traveller Preferences and Responses. In Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change (P. Stopher and M. Lee-Gosselin, eds.), Pergamon, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.
10. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
11. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2000.
12. Katz, R. Modeling Bicycle Demand As a Mainstream Transportation Planning Function. In Transportation Research Record 1502, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 22-28.
13. Eash, R. Destination and Mode Choice Models for Nonmotorized Travel. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1674, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 1-8.
14. Porter, C., J. Suhrbier, and W. L. Schwarte. Forecasting Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: State of the Practice and Research Needs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1674, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 94-101.
15. Turner, S., A. Hottenstein, and G. Shunk. Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Demand Forecasting. A Literature Review. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 1997.
16. Guidebook on Method to Estimate Non-Motorized Travel: Supporting Documentation. Publication No. FHWA-RD-98-166, FHWA, 1999.
17. Bovy, P. H. L., and M. A. Bradley. Route Choice Analyzed with Stated-Preference Approaches. In Transportation Research Record 1037, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 11-20.
18. Hopkinson, P., and M. Wardman. Evaluating the Demand for New Cycling Facilities. Transport Policy, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1996, pp. 241-249.
19. Abraham, J. E., S. McMillan, A. T. Brownlee, and J. D. Hunt. Investigation of Cycling Sensitivities. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
20. Stinson, M., and C. R. Bhat. Analysis of Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice Using a Stated Preference Survey. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
21. Ortuzar, J. D., I. lacobelli, and C. Valeze. Estimating Demand for a Cycle Network. Transportation Research A, Vol. 34, 2000, pp. 353-373.
22. Wardman, M., R. Hatfield, and M. Page. The UK National Cycling Strategy: Can Improved Facilities Meet the Targets? Transport Policy, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1997, pp. 123-133.
23. Wardman, M., C. A. Nash, M. R. Tight, and M. W. Page. Cycling and Urban Mode Choice. Final Report of Economic and Social Research Council Project R000237103. Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon, United Kingdom, 2000.