Comparing the economic value of mountain biking estimated using revealed and stated preference

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 227-236

  Fix, Peter ^a   Loomis, John ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMIC VALUE; MOUNTAIN BIKING; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; TRAVEL COST;

MOAB; USA; UTAH;

EID: 0031834297     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640569811731     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Boyle, K.J. & Bergstrom, J.C. (1992) Benefit transfer studies: myths, pragmatism, and idealism, Water Resources Research, 28(3), pp. 657-663.
2. Brown, W.G. & Nawas, F. (1973) Impact of aggregation on the estimation of outdoor recreation demand functions, American journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(2), pp. 246-249.
3. Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E., Martin, K.M. & Wright, J.L. (1996) Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods, Land Economics, 72(1), pp. 80-99.
4. Cesario, F. (1976) Valuing time in recreation benefit studies, Land Economics, 52, pp. 32-41.
5. Cesario, F.J. & Knetsch, J.L. (1970) Time bias in recreation benefit estimates, Water Resources Research, 6(3), pp. 700-704.
6. Creel, M.D. & Loomis, J.B. (1990) Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, pp. 434-441.
7. Desvousges, W.H., Naughton, M.C. & Parsons, G.R. (1992) Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies, Water Resources Research, 28(3), pp. 675-683.
8. Englin, J. & Shonkwiler, J.S. (1995) Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation, Review of Economics & Statistics, 77(1), pp. 104-112.
9. Freeman, A.M. III (1993) The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods (Washington, DC, Resources for the Future).
10. Hanemann, M.W. (1989) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete data: reply, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(4), pp. 1057-1061.
11. Loomis, J.B. (1988) Contingent valuation using dichotomous choice models, Journal of Leisure Research, 20(1), pp. 46-56.
12. Loomis, J.B. (1990) Comparative reliability of the dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent valuation techniques, Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 18, pp. 78-85.
13. Loomis, J.B. & Walsh, R.G. (1997) Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs, 2nd edition (State College, PA, Venture).
14. Luken, R.A., Johnson, R.F. & Kibler, V. (1992) Benefits and costs of pulp and paper effluent controls under the Clean Water Act, Water Resources Research, 28(3), pp. 665-674.
15. McConnell, K. & Strand, I. (1981) Measuring the cost of time in recreation demand analysis: an application to sportfishing, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), pp. 153-156.
16. Mitchell, R.C. & Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method (Washington, DC, Resources for the Future).
17. Park, T., Loomis, J.B. & Creel, M. (1991) Confidence intervals for evaluating benefit: estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies, Land Economics, 67(1), pp. 64-73.
18. Rosenthal, D.H. (1987) The necessity for substitute prices in recreation demand analysis, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69, pp. 828-837.
19. Rosenthal, D.H., Loomis, J.B. & Peterson. G.L. (1984) The travel cost model: concepts and applications, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-109 (Fort Collins, CO, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station).
20. Sellar, C., Stoll, R. & Chavas, J. (1985) Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: a comparison of nonmarket techniques, Land Economics, 61(2), pp. 156-175.
21. Walsh, R., Johnson, D.M. & McKean, J.R. (1992) Review of outdoor recreation economic demand studies with nonmarket benefit estimates, Colorado Water Resources Research Institute Technical Report No. 54 (Fort Collins, CO, Colorado State University).
22. Willig, R.D. (1976) Consumer surplus without apology, American Economic Review, 66(4), pp. 589-597.