Frequency of bicycle commuting: Internet-based survey analysis

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1878, 2004, Pages 122-130

  Stinson, Monique A ^a   Bhat, Chandra R ^b  

^a Chicago Area Transportation Study   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; AIR QUALITY; AUTOMOBILES; DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TRAFFIC CONTROL; URBAN PLANNING;

BICYCLING; COMMUTING; DEMOGRAPHY; INFRASTRUCTURE;

BICYCLES;

EID: 14044254110     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1878-15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Frank, L. D., P. O. Engelke, and T. L. Schmid. Health and Community Design: The Impact of the Built Environment on Physical Activity. Island Press, Washington, 2003.
2. Moritz, W. E. Survey of North American Bicycle Commuters: Design and Aggregate Results. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 91-101.
3. Deakin, E. A. Utilitarian Cycling: A Case Study of the Bay Area and Assessment of the Market for Commute Cycling. Research Report: FHWA/CA/TP-85/1, UCB-ITS-RR-85-9. University of California at Berkeley; California Department of Transportation; FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1985.
4. Williams, J., and J. Larson. Promoting Bicycle Commuting: Understanding the Customer. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1996, pp. 67-78.
5. Ottawa-Carleton Cycling Advisory Group. Commuter Cycling in Ottawa-Carleton: A Survey. Department of Engineering and Works, City of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1992.
6. Goldsmith, S. Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking Are Not Being Used More Extensively As Travel Modes. Publication No. FHWA-PD-92-041. Federal Highway Administration National Bicycle and Walking Study: Case Study #1, 1992. www.fhwa.dot.gov/safety/fourthlevel/pdf/Case1.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2003.
7. Antonakos, C. L. Environmental and Travel Preferences of Cyclists. In Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 25-33.
8. Everett, M. D. The Determinants of Mass Bicycle Commuting Revisited. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1990, pp. 360-366.
9. Forbes, G. The Hamilton-Wentworth Community Cycling Survey. ITE Journal, Vol. 68, No. 6, 1998, p. 16.
10. Hope, D. Nonrecreational Cycling in Ottawa, Canada. In Transportation Research Record 1441, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 147-150.
11. Beck, M. J. H., and L. H. Immers. Bicycle Ownership and Use in Amsterdam. In Transportation Research Record 1441, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 141-146.
12. Aultman-Hall, L., F. L. Hall, and B. B. Baetz. Analysis of Bicycle Commuter Routes Using Geographic Information Systems: Implications for Bicycle Planning. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 102-110.
13. Tanaboriboon, Y., and G. Ying. Characteristics of Bicycle Users in Shanghai, China. In Transportation Research Record 1396, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 22-29.
14. Hanson, S., and P. Hanson. Evaluating the Impact of Weather on Bicycle Use. In Transportation Research Record 629, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 43-48.
15. Ashley, C., and C. Banister. Cycling to Work from Wards in a Metropolitan Area. 1. Factors Influencing Cycling to Work. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1989, pp. 297-302.
16. Björsson, P. How to Encourage Cycling in Arctic Climate. Presented at Velo-City 2003 Conference, Paris, France, Sept. 2003.
17. Perala, T. Winter Cycling in Finland, Facts and the Future. Presented at Velo-City 2003 Conference, Paris, France, Sept. 2003.
18. Bach, B., and N. Pressman. Urban Design as a Helping Hand to Promote Bike Use: Urban Pattern Based Design Steps. Presented at Vélo Mondial 2000 Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, June 2000.
19. Niemeier, D., G. Rutherford, and J. Ishimaru. An Analysis of Bicyclist Survey Responses from the Puget Sound Area and Spokane. Report 95.4. Washington State Transportation Commission, Olympia, 1995.
20. Nelson, A. C., and D. Allen. If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them: Association Between Bicycle Facilities and Bicycle Commuting. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 79-83.
21. Baltes, M. R. Factors Influencing Nondiscretionary Work Trips by Bicycle Determined from 1990 U.S. Census Metropolitan Statistical Area Data. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 96-101.
22. Rajamani, J., C. R. Bhat, S. Handy, G. Knaap, and Y. Song. Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice After Controlling for Demographic and Level-of-Service Effects. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 158-165.
23. Schwartz, W. L., C. D. Porter, G. C. Payne, J. H. Suhrbier, P. C. Moe, and W. L. Wilkinson III. Guidebook on Methods to Estimate Non-Motorized Travel: Overview of Methods. Publication No. FHWA-RD-98-165. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999, www.fhwa.dot.gov/tfhrc/safety/pubs/vol1/title.htm. Accessed July 29, 2003.
24. Stinson, M. A., and C. R. Bhat. Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 107-115.
25. Stinson, M. A., and C. R. Bhat. A Survey of Commuter Bicyclists' Route Preferences, 2002. members.toast.net/quest/surveys/bikecomm2002.htm. Accessed Nov. 15, 2003.
26. Stinson, M. A., and C. R. Bhat. A Survey of Commuter Bicyclists' Route Preferences, 2002. www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/bicyclists_survey.htm. Accessed Nov. 15, 2003.
27. McKelvey, R. D., and W. Zavonia. A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal-Level Dependent Variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 4, 1975, pp. 103-120.
28. Agyemang-Duah, K., and F. L. Hall. Spatial Transferability of an Ordered Response Model of Trip Generation. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1997, pp. 389-402.
29. Bhat, C. R., and H. Zhao. The Spatial Analysis of Activity Stop Generation. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2002, pp. 557-575.
30. Bhat, C. R., and S. Srinivasan. A Multidimensional Mixed Ordered-Response Model for Analyzing Weekend Activity Participation Accommodating Demographic, Internet Use, Residential Location, and Day of Week/Seasonal Effects. Technical paper. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 2003.