What is at the end of the road? Understanding discontinuities of on-street bicycle lanes in urban settings

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 55-68

  Krizek, Kevin J ^a   Roland, Rio W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; INTERSECTIONS; RIDING QUALITIES; STRATEGIC PLANNING; URBAN PLANNING;

BICYCLE LANES; CROSSING INTERSECTIONS; SERVICE TOOLKIT;

BICYCLES;

CYCLE TRANSPORT; DESIGN; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

LANES;

EID: 10944228754     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2004.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1999. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
2. C.L. Antonakos Environmental and travel preferences of cyclists Transportation Research Record 1438 1994 25-33
3. Census 2000 Supplemental Survey, 2000. Means of Transportation to work for Workers 16 Years and Older, Summary Table P047. Washington, DC, US Census
4. Chicago Bike Lane Design Guide, 2002. Chicago Bike Lane Design Guide. Available from Accessed July 21, 2004
5. B. Epperson Evaluating suitability of roadways for bicycle use: Towards a cycling level-of-service standard Transportation Research Record 1438 2002 9-16
6. Federal Highway Administration, 1994. The National Bicycling and Walking Study. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
7. Federal Highway Administration, 1998. The Bicycle Compatibility Index: A Level of Service Concept, Implementation Manual. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
8. Federal Highway Administration, 1999. A Comparative Analysis of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes: Final Report. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
9. J. Forester The bikeway controversy Transportation Quarterly 55 2001 7-17
10. D.L. Harkey J.R. Stewart Evaluation of shared-use facilities for bicycles and motor vehicles Transportation Research Record 1578 1997 111-118
11. B.W. Landis Bicycle interaction hazard score: A theoretical model Transportation Research Record 1438 1994 3-8
12. B.W. Landis Bicycle system performance measures ITE Journal February 1996 18-26
13. B.W. Landis V.R. Battikuti R.M. Ottenberg T.A. Petrisch Intersection level of service: The bicycle through movement Transportation Research Record 1828 2003 101-106
14. B.W. Landis V.R. Vatikuti M.T. Brannick Real-time human perceptions: toward a bicycle level of service Transportation Research Record 1578 1997 119-126
15. Lebsack, J.W., 1995. Calculating bicycle stress factors for a bicycle map. In: ITE 65th Annual Meeting
16. D.F. Lott T. Tardiff D.Y. Lott Evaluation by experienced riders of a new bicycle lane in an established bikeway system Transportation Research Record 683 1978 40-46
17. Minnesota Department of Transportation, 1996. Minnesota Bicycle Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN
18. W.E. Moritz Survey of North American bicycle commuters: Design and aggregate results Transportation Research Record 1578 1997 91-101
19. Nabti, J., Ridgway, M., 2002. Innovative Bicycle Treatments: An Informational Report. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC
20. R.B. Noland Perceived risk and modal choice: Risk compensation in transportation systems Accident Analysis and Prevention 27 1995 503-521
21. Pflaum, D.C., 2003. Personal communication
22. J.A.L.D. Pucher Making walking and cycling safer: Lessons from Europe Transportation Quarterly 54 2000 25-50
23. A. Sorton T.W. Walsh Bicycle stress level as a tool to evaluate urban and suburban bicycle compatibility Transportation Research Record 1438 1994 17-24
24. M. Stinson C. Bhat Commuter bicyclist route choice Transportation Research Record 1828 2003 107-115