Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods

Transport Policy

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 127-141

  Cervero, Robert ^a   Radisch, Carolyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use; Modal split; Neighborhood design; Travel demand

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; MODAL SPLIT; NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN; NEW URBANISM; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR;

USA, CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, LAFAYETTE; USA, CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, ROCKRIDGE;

EID: 0030428610     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cambridge Systematics (1994) The Effects of Land Use and Travel Demand Strategies on Commuting Behavior, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
2. Cervero, R. (1989) America's Suburban Centers: The Land Use-Transportation Link, Unwin-Hyman, Boston.
3. Cervero, R. (1993) Transit-Supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC.
4. Cervero, R. (1994) 'Ridership impacts of transit-based housing in California', Transport Policy, 2(1) 22-36.
5. Cervero, R. (1996) 'Mixed land uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey', Transportation Research A, 30(5) 361-377.
6. Ewing, R., Haliyur, P. and Page, G. (1994) 'Getting around a traditional city, a suburban PUD, and everything in-between', Transportation Research Record, 1466, 53-62.
7. Fehr and Peers Associates (1992) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Bay Area Trip Rate Survey Analysis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland.
8. Frank, L. and Pivo, G. (1994) 'The impacts of mixed use and density on the utilization of three modes of travel: The single occupant vehicle, transit, and walking', Transportation Research Record, 1466 44-52.
9. Handy, S. (1993) 'Regional versus local accessibility: Neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel', Built Environment, 18(4) 256-67.
10. Hare, P. (1992) 'Junking the clunker: and other strategies for making the suburbs manageable for single-car households', Western Cities, 68(10) 23-29.
11. Holtzclaw, J. (1990) 'Manhattinization versus sprawl: how density impacts auto use comparing five bay area communities', Proceedings of the Eleventh International Pedestrian Conference, Boulder, Colorado, City of Boulder, pp. 99-106.
12. Holtzclaw, J. (1994) Residential Patterns and Transit, Auto Dependence, and Costs, Resources Defense Council, San Francisco.
13. Katz, P. (1994). The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, McGraw-Hill, New York.
14. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P, and Laidet, L. (1994) A Micro-Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area, University of California at Davis, report prepared for the California Air Resources Board, Davis.
15. Levinson, H. and Wynn, F. (1963) 'Effects of density on urban transportation requirements', Highway Research Record, 2 38-64.
16. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas (1993) The Pedestrian Environment: Making the Land Use, Transportation, Air Quality Connection, LUTRAQ Project, Volume 4A, Portland, Oregon.
17. Pushkarev, B. and Zupan, J. (1977) Public Transportation and Land Use Policy Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
18. Rosenbloom, S. (1987) The impact of growing children on their parents' travel behavior: A comparative analysis', Transportation Research Record, 1135, 12-19.
19. Vance, J. (1964) 'Geography and urban evolution in the San Francisco Bay Area'. In F. Kane (ed.) The San Francisco Bay Area: Its Problems and Future, Institute of Governmental Studies, Berkeley.