Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data

Transportation

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-109

  Parkin, John ^a   Wardman, Mark ^b   Page, Matthew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bicycle; Census; Journey to work; Logistic regression model; Travel demand modelling

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

BICYCLE ROUTE; CENSUS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODEL; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELLING;

BICYCLES;

CENSUS; CYCLE TRANSPORT; ESTIMATION METHOD; FORECASTING METHOD; JOURNEY TO WORK; MODELING; PLANNING METHOD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 36448937082     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-007-9137-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ashley, C.A., Banister, C.: Cycling to work from wards in a metropolitan area. 1 Factors influencing cycling to work. Traff. Eng. Con. 30(6), 297-302 (1989)
2. Baltes, M.: Factors Influencing Nondiscretionary Work Trips by Bicycle Determined from 1990 US Census Metropolitan Statistical Area Data, pp. 96-101. Transportation research record 1538 TRB, National research council, Washington, DC (1996)
3. Bovy, P.H.L., Den Adel, DEN.: Routekeuzegedrag van fietsers: een analyse met de funktionele meetmethode. Delftse Universitaire Pers, Delft (1985)
4. Bovy, P.H.L., Bradley, M.A.: Route choice analysed with stated preference approaches. Trans. Res. Rec. 1037, 11-20 (1985)
5. British Standards: 6399 Part II Loading for buildings. Code of practice for wind loads (1997)
6. Cervero, R., Radisch, C.: Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighbourhoods. Trans. Pol. 3(3), 127-141 (1996)
7. CROW: Sign up for the Bike - Design Manual for a Cycle Friendly Infrastructure. Centre for research and contract standardisation in civil engineering, The Netherlands (1993)
8. Defra: Department of environment food and rural affairs, Countryside Information System http://www.cis-web.org.uk/home/ (Cited 2003)
9. DfT: National Cycling Strategy. Department for Transport, London www.dft.gov.uk (1996)
10. DfT: The future of transport - a network for 2030. Transport White Paper, July 2004. Department for Transport, London. www.dft.gov.uk (2004)
11. Dill, J., Carr, T.: Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities. Trans. Res. Rec. 1828 (2003)
12. Guthrie, N., Davies, D.G., Gardner, G.: Cyclists' Assessments of Road and Traffic Conditions: The Development of a Cyclability Index. TRL Report 490. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne (2001)
13. Hopkinson, P., Wardman, M.: Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities. Trans. Pol. 3(4), 241-249 (1996)
14. Landis, B.W., Vattikuti, V.R., Brannick, M.T.: Real-time human perceptions toward a bicycle level of service. Trans. Res. Rec. 1578 (1997)
15. LRC: The Travel Behaviour of Different Ethnic Groups in London. London Research Centre, London (1997)
16. Meteorological Office: UK climate and weather statistics http://www.met-office.gov.uk/climate/uk/ (cited 2004)
17. McClintock, H., Cleary, J.: Cycle facilities and cyclists' safety. Trans. Pol. 3 (1/2), 67-77 (1996)
18. Moudon, A.V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A.D., Collier, C.W., Johnson, D., Schmid, T.L., Weather, R.D.: Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Trans. Res. D 11, 245-261 (2005)
19. National Statistics: Transport Statistics Bulletin, National Travel Survey: 2004 SB (05) 30. Department for Transport, London (2005)
20. Nelson, A., Allen, D.: If You Build them, Commuters Will Use them: Association between Bicycle Facilities and Bicycle Commuting, pp. 79-83. Transportation research record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC (1997)
21. Ortúzar, J. de D., Iacobelli, A., Valeze, C.: Estimating demand for a cycleway network. Trans. Res. A 34, 353-373 (2000)
22. Parkin, J.: Comparisons of cycle use for the journey to work from the '81, '91 and 2001 censuses. Traff. Eng. Con. 44(8), 299-302 (2003)
23. Parkin, J., Wardman, M., Page, M.: Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 39, pp. 364-371. (2007). doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.007
24. Pindyck, R.S., Rubinfeld, D.L.: Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)
25. Plaut, P.O.: Non-motorized commuting in the US. Trans. Res. D 10, 347-356 (2005)
26. Rietveld, P., Daniel, VD: Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? Trans. Res. A 38, 531-550 (2004)
27. Stinson, M.A., Bhat, C.R.: Frequency of bicycle commuting: internet-based survey analysis. Transportation Research Board No. 04-3493 (2004)
28. Stinson, M.A., Bhat C.R.: A comparison of the route preferences of experienced and inexperienced bicycle commuters. Transportation Research Board Paper No. 05-1434 (2005)
29. Tilahun, N.Y., Levinson, D.M., Krizek, K.J.: Trails, lanes, or traffic: valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Trans. Res. A (2006)
30. Waldman, J.A.: Cycling in Towns: A Quantitative Investigation. LTR1 Working paper 3. Department for Transport, London (1977) (Out of print)
31. Wardman, M., Hatfield, R., Page, M.: The UK national cycling strategy: can improved facilities meet the targets? Trans. Pol. 4(2), 123-133 (1997)
32. Wardman, M., Tight, M., Page, M.: Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Trans. Res. A 41, 339-350 (2007)
33. Webtag. Guidance on the Appraisal of Walking and Cycling Schemes TAG Unit 3.14.1. Consultation, March. www.webtag.org.uk (2007)