Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 199-219

  Cervero, Robert ^a   Kockelman, Kara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STATISTICS; URBAN PLANNING;

TRAVEL DEMAND;

TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

EID: 0031233750     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Banister, D. and Lichfield, N. (1995) The key issues in transport and urban development. Transport and Urban Development, ed. D. Banister, pp. 1-16. E and FN Spon, London.
2. Calthorpe, P. (1994) The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Cambridge Systematics (1994) The Effects of Land Use and Travel Demand Strategies on Commuting Behavior. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
4. Cervero, R. (1989) America's Suburban Centers: The Land Use-transportation Link. Unwin-Hyman, Boston.
5. Cervero, R. (1991) Land uses and travel at suburban activity centers. Transportation Quarterly 45(4), 479-491.
6. Cervero, R. (1993) Transit-supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC.
7. Cervero, R. (1996) Mixed land uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey. Transportation Research 30(5), 361-377.
8. Cervero, R. and Radisch, C. (1996) Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy 3(3), 127-141.
9. Cervero, R. and Seskin, S. (1995) An Evaluation of the Relationships Between Transit and Urban Form. National Research Council, Transportation Cooperative Research Program, Research Results Digest, Number 7, Washington, DC.
10. Chatterjee, S. and Price, B. (1991) Regression Analysis by Example. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
11. Crane, R. (1996) Cars and drivers in the new suburbs: linking access to travel in neotraditional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(1), 51-65.
12. Dittmar, H. (1995) A broader context for transportation planning: not just an end in itself. Journal of the American Planning Association 61(1), 7-13.
13. Downs, A. (1994) New Visions for Metropolitan America. The Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington, DC.
14. Dunphy, R. and Fisher, K. (1996). Transportation, congestion, and density: new insights. Transportation Research Record, 1552, 89-96
15. Dunteman, G. H. (1984) Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
16. Ewing, R. (1994) Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: a literature review. Environmental and Urban Issues 11(2), 1-15.
17. Ewing, R., Haliyur, P. and Page, G. (1994) Getting around a traditional city, a suburban PUD, and everything in-between. Transportation Research Record 1466, 53-62.
18. Fehr and Peers Associates (1992) Metropolitan Transportation Commission bay area trip rate survey analysis. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, CA.
19. Frank, L. and Pivo, G. (1994) The impacts of mixed use and density on the utilization of three modes of travel: the single occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record 1466, 44-52.
20. Handy, S. (1991) Neo-traditional development: the debate. Berkeley Planning Journal 6, 135-144.
21. Handy, S. (1992) How Land Use Patterns Affect Travel Patterns. Council of Planning Librarians, Chicago.
22. Handy, S. (1993) Regional versus local accessibility: neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environment 18(4), 256-267.
23. Holtzclaw, J. (1990) Manhattanization versus sprawl: how density impacts auto use comparing five bay area communities. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Pedestrian Conference. City of Boulder, Boulder, Colorado. pp. 99-106.
24. Holtzclaw, J. (1994) Residential Patterns and Transit, Auto Dependence, and Costs. Resources Defense Council, San Francisco.
25. Katz, P. (1994) The New Urbanism. McGraw-Hill, New York.
26. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. and Laidet, L. (1994) A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay area. University of California at Davis report prepared for the California Air Resources Board.
27. Levinson, D. and Kumar, A. (1995) A multimodal trip distribution model: structure and application. Transportation Research Record 1446, 124-131.
28. Levinson, H. and Wynn, F. (1963) Effects of density on urban transportation requirements. Highway Research Record 2, 38-64.
29. Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (1989) Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of U.S. cities with a global survey. Journal of the American Planning Association 55(1), 24-37.
30. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. (1993) The Pedestrian Environment: Making the Land Use, Transportation, Air Quality Connection. LUTRAQ Project, Vol. 4A, Portland, Oregon.
31. Pushkarev, B. and Zupan, J. (1977) Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
32. Steiner, R. (1994) Residential density and travel patterns: a review of the literature. Transportation Research Record 1466, 37-43.
33. Thurstone, L. (1947) Multiple Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
34. Untermann, R. (1984) Accommodating the Pedestrian: Adapting Towns and Neighborhoods for Walking and Bicycling. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.