Optimizing the underlying parameters for protein-nanoparticle interaction: Advancement in theoretical simulation

Nanotechnology Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 347-359

  Khan, Syamantak ^a   Nandi, Chayan K ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MANDI   (India)

Author keywords

Docking simulation; Protein adsorption; Protein nanoparticle interaction; Surface chemistry; Time scale

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

APPLICATIONS OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES; COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION; DOCKING SIMULATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES; PROTEIN ADSORPTION; PROTEIN NANOPARTICLES; THEORETICAL SIMULATION; TIME-SCALES;

PROTEINS;

EID: 84906853646     PISSN: 21919089     EISSN: 21919097     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ntrev-2014-0002     Document Type: Article

References (173)

1. Hlady VV, Buijs J. Protein adsorption on solid surfaces. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1996, 7, 72-77.
2. Castner DG, Ratner BD. Biomedical surface science foundations to frontiers. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 28-60.
3. Tsai WB, Grunkemeier JM, McFarland CD, Horbett TA. Platelet adhesion to polystyrene-based surfaces preadsorbed with plasmas selectively depleted in fibrinogen, fibronectin, vitronectin, or von Willebrand's factor. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 60, 348-359.
4. Dee KC, Puleo DA, Bizios R. Tissue-Biomaterials Interactions, Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2002, pp. 45-49.NN 1-7.
5. Latour RA. The Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Taylor & Francis: New York, 2005, pp. 1-15.
6. Hellstrand E, Lynch I, Andersson A, Drakenberg T, Dahlbäck B, Dawson KA, Linse S, Cedervall T. Complete high-density lipoproteins in nanoparticle corona. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 3372-3381.
7. Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EM, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 543-557.
8. Walczyk D, Bombelli FB, Monopoli MP, Lynch I, Dawson KA. What the cell "sees" in bionanoscience. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5761-5768.
9. Aggarwal P, Hall JB, McLeland CB, Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE. Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2009, 61, 428-437.
10. Tenzer S, Docter D, Rosfa S, Wlodarski A, Kuharev J, Rekik A, Knauer SK, Bantz C, Nawroth T, Bier C, Sirirattanapan J, Mann W, Treuel L, Zellner R, Maskos M, Schild H, Stauber RH. Nanoparticle size is a critical physicochemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 7155-7167.
11. Ge C, Du J, Zhao L, Wang L, Liu Y, Li D, Yang Y, Zhou R, Zhao Y, Chai Z, Chen C. Binding of blood proteins to carbon nanotubes reduces cytotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 16968-16973.
12. Ang JC, Lin J-M, Yaron PN, White JW. Protein trapping of silica nanoparticles. Soft Matter 2010, 6, 383-390.
13. Grabinski C, Schaeublin N, Wijaya A, Couto SH, Baxamusa K, Schifferli H, Hussain SM. Effect of gold nanorod surface chemistry on cellular response. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 2870-2879.
14. Arvizo RR, Miranda OR, Thompson MA, Pabelick CM, Bhattacharya R, Robertson JD, Rotello VM, Prakash YS, Mukherjee P. Effect of nanoparticle surface charge at the plasma membrane and beyond. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2543-2548.
15. Cho EC, Au L, Zhang Q, Xia Y. The effects of size, shape and surface functional group of gold nanostructures on their adsorption and internalization by cells. Small 2010, 6, 517-522.
16. Hong R, Han G, Fernández JM, Kim BJ, Forbes NS, Rotello VM. Glutathione-mediated delivery and release using monolayer protected nanoparticle carriers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1078-1079.
17. Nativo P, Prior IA, Brust M. Uptake and intracellular fate of surface-modified gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 1639-1644.
18. Oyelere AK, Chen PC, Huang X, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. Peptide-conjugated gold nanorods for nuclear targeting. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 1490-1497.
19. Verma A, Stellacci F. Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. Small 2010, 6, 12-21.
20. Liang M, Lin IC, Whittaker MR, Minchin RF, Monteiro MJ, Toth I. Cellular uptake of densely packed polymer coatings on gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 403-413.
21. Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 779-786.
22. Geelhood SJ, Horbett TA, Ward WK, Wood MD, Quinn MJ. Passivating protein coatings for implantable glucose sensors evaluation of protein retention. J. Biomed. Mater. Res, Part B Appl. Biomater. 2007, 81, 251-260.
23. Lange K, Grimm S, Rapp M. Chemical modification of parylene C coatings for SAW biosensors. Sens Actuators B 2007, 125, 441-446.
24. Aubin-Tam ME, Zhou H, Hamad-Schifferli K. Structure of cytochrome c at the interface with magnetic CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 554-559.
25. Hall JB, Dobrovolskaia MA, Patri AK, McNeil SE. Characterization of nanoparticles for therapeutics. Nanomedicine 2007, 2, 789-803.
26. Hung CW, Holoman TRP, Kofinas P, Bentley WE. Towards oriented assembly of proteins onto magnetic nanoparticles. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 38, 164-170.
27. Lynch I, Dawson KA. Protein-nanoparticle interactions. Nanotoday 2008, 3, 40-47.
28. Mu Q, Liu W, Xing Y, Zhou H, Li Z, Zhang Y, Ji L, Wang F, Si Z, Zhang B, Yan B. Protein binding by functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes is governed by the surface chemistry of both parties and the nanotube diameter. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 3300-3307.
29. Hartmann M. Ordered mesoporous materials for bioadsorption and biocatalysis. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 4577-4593.
30. Shüler C, Carusa F. Preparation of enzyme multilayers on colloids for biocatalysis. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2000, 21, 750-753.
31. Yang HH, Zhang SQ, Chen XL, Zhuang ZX, Xu JG, Wang XR. Magnetite-containing spherical silica nanoparticles for biocatalysis and bioseparations. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 1316-1321.
32. Yu AM, Liang ZJ, Caruso F. Enzyme multilayer-modified porous membranes as biocatalysts. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 171-175.
33. Goto Y, Matsuno R, Konno T, Takai M, Ishihara K. Polymer nanoparticles covered with phosphorylcholine groups and immobilized with antibody for high-affinity separation of proteins. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 828-833.
34. Salvati A, Pitek AS, Monopoli MP, Prapainop K, Bombelli FB, Hristov DR, Kelly PM, Åberg C, Mahon E, Dawson KA. Transferrin-functionalized nanoparticles lose their targeting capabilities when a biomolecule corona adsorbs on the surface. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 137-143.
35. Kusnezow W, Hoheisel JD. Antibody microarrays promises and problems. Biotechniques Suppl. S. 2002, 33, 14-23.
36. Steinhauer C, Wingren C, Hager AC, Borrebaeck CA. Single framework recombinant antibody fragments designed for protein chip applications. Biotechniques Suppl. S. 2002, 33, 38-45.
37. Shankaran DRM, Miura N. Trends in interfacial design for surface plasmon resonance based immunoassays. J. Phys. D 2007, 40, 7187-7200.
38. Salmain M, Fischer-Durand N, Pradier CM. Infrared optical immunosensor application to the measurement of the herbicide atrazine. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 373, 61-70.
39. Sanchez S, Pumera M, Fabregas E. Carbon nanotube/ polysulfone screen-printed electrochemical immunosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 23, 332-340.
40. Wang HX, Meng S, Guo K, Liu Y, Yang PY, Zhong W, Liu BH. Microfluidic immunosensor based on stable antibodypatterned surface in PMMA microchip. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 447-450.
41. Mahmoudi M, Lynch I, Ejtehadi MR, Monopoli MP, Bombelli FB, Laurent S. Protein nanoparticle interactions opportunities and challenges. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5610-5637.
42. Lacerda SH, Park JJ, Meuse C, Pristinski D, Becker ML, Karim A, Douglas JF. Interaction of gold nanoparticles with common human blood proteins. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 365-379.
43. Maiorano G, Sabella S, Sorce B, Brunetti V, Malvindi MA, Cingolani R, Pompa PP. Effects of cell culture media on the dynamic formation of protein nanoparticle complexes and influence on the cellular response. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7481-7491.
44. Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Berggøard T, Thulin E, Nilsson H, Dawson KA, Linse S. Understanding the nanoparticle protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2050-2055.
45. Lundqvist M, Stigler J, Elia G, Lynch I, Cedervall T, Dawson KA. Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 14265-14270.
46. Dutta D, Sundaram SK, Teeguarden JG, Riley BJ, Fifield LS, Jacobs JM, Addleman SR, Kaysen GA, Moudgil BM, Weber TJ. Adsorbed proteins influence the biological activity and molecular targeting of nanomaterials. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 100, 303-315.
47. Lynch I, Dawson KA, Linse S. Detecting cryptic epitopes created by nanoparticles. Sci. STKE 2006, 327, pe14.
48. Treuel L, Malissek M, Gebauer JS, Zellner R. The influence of surface composition of nanoparticles on their interactions with serum albumin. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 3093-3099.
49. Casals E, Pfaller T, Duschl A, Oostingh GJ, Puntes V. Time evolution of the nanoparticle protein corona. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3623-3632.
50. Tsai DH, Delrio FW, Keene AM, Tyner KM, Maccuspie RI, Cho TJ, Zachariah MR, Hackley VA. Adsorption and conformation of serum albumin protein on gold nanoparticles investigated using dimensional measurements and in situ spectroscopic methods. Langmuir 2011, 27, 2464-2477.
51. Monopoli MP, Walczyk D, Campbell A, Elia G, Lynch I, Bombelli FB, Dawson KA. Physical chemical aspects of protein corona relevance to in vitro and in vivo biological impacts of nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2525-2534.
52. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311, 622-627.
53. Vecchio G, Galeone A, Brunetti V, Maiorano G, Sabella S, Cingolani R, Pompa PP. Concentration-dependent, size-independent toxicity of citrate-capped AuNPs in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 2012, 7, e29980.
54. Vecchio G, Galeone A, Brunetti V, Maiorano G, Rizzello L, Sabella S, Cingolani R, Pompa PP. Mutagenic effects of gold nanoparticles induce aberrant phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2012, 8, 1-7.
55. Chen X, Gambhir SS, Cheon J. Theranostic nanomedicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 841-841.
56. Makrodimitris K, Masica DL, Kim ET, Gray JJ. Structure prediction of protein-solid surface interactions reveals a molecular recognition motif of statherin for hydroxyapatite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13713-13722.
57. Gray JJ. The interaction of proteins with solid surfaces. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14, 110-115.
58. Harding MM, Nowicki MW, Walkinshaw MD. Metals in protein structures a review of their principal features. Crystallogr. Rev. 2010, 16, 247-302.
59. Latour RA. Molecular simulation of protein surface interactions benefits, problems, solutions, and future directions. Biointerphases 2008, 3, FC2-FC12.
60. Cohavi O, Corni S, De Rienzo F, Di Felice R, Gottschalk KE, Hoefling M, Kokh D, Molinari E, Schreiber G, Vaskevich A, Wade RC. Protein surface interactions challenging experiments and computations. J. Mol. Recognit. 2009, 23, 259-262.
61. Bachmann M, Goede K, Beck-Sickinger AG, Grundmann M, Irbäck A, Janke W. Microscopic mechanism of specific peptide adhesion to semiconductor substrates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9530-9533.
62. Di Felice R, Corni S. Simulation of peptide surface recognition. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 1510-1519.
63. Khan S, Gupta A, Nandi CK. Controlling the fate of protein corona by tuning surface properties of nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 3747-3752.
64. Muegge I. Selection criteria for drug-like compounds. Med. Res. Rev. 2003, 23, 302-321.
65. Bernard D, Coop A, Mackerell AD. Conformationally sampled pharmacophore for peptidic delta opioid ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 7773-7780.
66. Chen HF. Computational study of the binding mode of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitors. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2008, 71, 434-446.
67. Fischer B, Fukuzawa K, Wenzel W. Receptor-specific scoring functions derived from quantum chemical models improve affinity estimates for in-silico drug discovery. Proteins 2008, 70, 1264-1273.
68. Waszkowycz B. Towards improving compound selection in structure-based virtual screening. Drug. Discov. Today 2008, 13, 219-226.
69. Beck DAC, Daggett V. Methods for molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding/unfolding in solution. Methods 2004, 34, 112-120.
70. Brooks CL III. Simulations of protein folding and unfolding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1998, 8, 222-226.
71. Ferrara P, Apostolakis J, Caflisch A. Thermodynamics and kinetics of folding of two model peptides investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 5000-5010.
72. Fersht AR, Daggett V. Protein folding and unfolding at atomic resolution. Cell 2002, 108, 573-582.
73. Gnanakaran S, Nymeyer H, Portman J, Sanbonmatsu KY, Garcia AE. Peptide folding simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2003, 13, 168-174.
74. Hofinger S, Almeida B, Hansmann UHE. Parallel tempering molecular dynamics folding simulation of a signal peptide in explicit water. Proteins 2007, 68, 662-669.
75. Jang SM, Kim E, Pak YS. All-atom level direct folding simulation of a betabetaalpha miniprotein. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 105102.
76. Schaeffer RD, Fersht A, Daggett V. Combining experiment and simulation in protein folding closing the gap for small model systems. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 4-9.
77. Wang W, Donini O, Reyes CM, Kollman PA. Biomolecular simulations recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and proteinnucleic acid noncovalent interactions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30, 211-243.
78. Halperin I, Ma BY, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002, 47, 409-443.
79. Ehrlich LP, Nilges M, Wade RC. The impact of protein flexibility on protein-protein docking. Proteins 2005, 58, 126-133.
80. De Grandis V, Bizzarri AR, Cannistraro S. Docking study and free energy simulation of the complex between p53 DNA-binding domain and azurin. J. Mol. Recognit. 2007, 20, 215-226.
81. Costantini S, Colonna G, Facchiano AM. Simulation of conformational changes occurring when a protein interacts with its receptor. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2007, 31, 196-206.
82. Chandrasekaran V, Ambati J, Ambati BK, Taylor EW. Molecular docking and analysis of interactions between vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and SPARC protein. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2007, 26, 775-782.
83. Bond PJ, Sansom MSP. Insertion and assembly of membrane proteins via simulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2697-2704.
84. Efremov RG, Nolde DE, Vergoten G, Arseniev AS. A solvent model for simulations of peptides in bilayers. II. Membranespanning alpha-helices. Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 2460-2471.
85. Hyvonen MT, Oorni K, Kovanen PT, Ala-Korpela M. Changes in a phospholipid bilayer induced by the hydrolysis of a phospholipase A2 enzyme a molecular dynamics simulation study. Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 565-578.
86. Malmsten M. Formation of adsorbed protein layers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 207, 186-199.
87. Morra M. On the molecular basis of fouling resistance. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2000, 11, 547-569.
88. Roth CM, Lenhoff AM. Quantitative modeling of protein adsorption. Surfactant Sci. Ser. 1998, 75, 89-118.
89. Oberholzer MR, Lenhoff AM. Protein adsorption isotherms through colloidal energetics. Langmuir 1999, 15, 3905-3914.
90. Oberholzer MR, Wagner NJ, Lenhoff AM. Grand canonical Brownian dynamics simulation of colloidal adsorption. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 9157-9167.
91. Adamczyk Z, Weronski P, Musial E. Particle adsorption under irreversible conditions kinetics and jamming coverage. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2002, 208, 29-40.
92. Adamczyk Z, Zembala M, Siwek B, Warszynski P. Structure and ordering in localized adsorption of particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1990, 140, 123-137.
93. Adamczyk Z, Siwek B, Zembala M, Belouschek P. Kinetics of localized adsorption of colloid particles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1994, 48, 151-280.
94. Adamczyk Z, Weronski P. Unoriented adsorption of interacting spheroidal particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 189, 348-360.
95. Van Tassel PR, Guemouri L, Ramsden JJ, Tarjus G, Viot P, Talbot J. A particle-level model of irreversible protein adsorption with a postadsorption transition. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 207, 317-323.
96. Brusatori MA, Van Tassel PR. A kinetic model of protein adsorption/surface-induced transition kinetics evaluated by the scaled particle theory. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 219, 333-338.
97. Stahlberg J, Jonsson B. Influence of charge regulation in electrostatic interaction chromatography of proteins. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1536-1544.
98. Szleifer I. Protein adsorption on surfaces with grafted polymers a theoretical approach. Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 595-612.
99. Satulovsky J, Carignano MA, Szleifer I. Kinetic and thermodynamic control of protein adsorption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9037-9041.
100. Fang F, Szleifer I. Kinetics and thermodynamics of protein adsorption a generalized molecular theoretical approach. Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 2568-2589.
101. Asthagiri D, Lenhoff AM. Influence of structural details in modeling electrostatically driven protein adsorption. Langmuir 1997, 13, 6761-6768.
102. Castells V, Yang S, Van Tassel PR. Surface-induced conformational changes in lattice model proteins by Monte Carlo simulation. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 2002, 65, 031912.
103. Sheng Y-J, Tsao H-K, Zhou J, Jiang S. Orientation of a Y-shaped biomolecule adsorbed on a charged surface. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 2002, 66, 011911.
104. Latour RA Jr, Hench LL. A theoretical analysis of the thermodynamic contributions for the adsorption of individual protein residues on functionalized surfaces. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 4633-4648.
105. Latour RA Jr, Rini CJ. Theoretical analysis of adsorption thermodynamics for hydrophobic peptide residues on SAM surfaces of varying functionality. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 60, 564-577.
106. Basalyga DM, Latour RA Jr. Theoretical analysis of adsorption thermodynamics for charged peptide residues on SAM surfaces of varying functionality. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2003, 64, 120-130.
107. Agashe M, Raut V, Stuart SJ, Latour RA. Molecular simulation to characterize the adsorption behavior of a fibrinogen gamma-chain fragment. Genetically engineered gold-binding polypeptides: structure prediction and molecular dynamics. Langmuir 2005, 21, 1103-1117.
108. Braun R, Sarikaya M, Schulten K. Genetically engineered gold-binding polypeptides: structure prediction and molecular dynamics. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2002, 13, 747-757.
109. Dalal P, Knickelbein J, Haymet ADJ, Sonnichsen FD, Madura JD. Hydrogen bond analysis of Type 1 antifreeze protein in water and the ice/water interface. Phys. Chem. Commun. 2001, 4, 32-36.
110. Raut VP, Agashe MA, Stuart SJ, Latour RA. Molecular dynamics simulations of peptide-surface interactions. Langmuir 2005, 21, 1629-1639.
111. Jorov A, Zhorov BS, Yang DS. Theoretical study of interaction of winter flounder antifreeze protein with ice. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1524-1537.
112. Mungikar A, Forciniti D. Effect of cosolvents on the adsorption of peptides at the solid-liquid interface. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 239-251.
113. Noinville V, Vidalmadjar C, Sebille B. Modeling of protein adsorption on polymer surfaces. Computation of adsorption potential. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 1516-1522.
114. Huq NL, Cross KJ, Reynolds EC. Molecular modelling of a multiphosphorylated sequence motif bound to hydroxyapatite surfaces. J. Mol. Model. 2000, 6, 35-47.
115. Yarovsky I, Hearn MTW, Aguilar MI. Molecular simulation of peptide interactions with an RP-HPLC sorbent. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 10962-10970.
116. Cormack AN, Lewis RJ, Goldstein AH. Computer simulation of protein adsorption to a material surface in aqueous solution: biomaterials modeling of a ternary system. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 20408-20418.
117. Madura JD, Wierzbicki A, Harrington JP, Maughon RH, Raymond JA, Sikes CS. Interactions of the D and L-forms of winter flounder antifreeze peptide with the [201] planes of ice. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 417-418.
118. Oren EE, Tamerler C, Sarikaya M. Metal recognition of septapeptides via polypod molecular architecture. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 415-419.
119. Raffaini G, Ganazzoli F. Protein adsorption on the hydrophilic surface of a glassy polymer: a computer simulation study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 2765-2772.
120. Wierzbicki A, Madura JD, Salmon C, Sonnichsen FA. New atom-additive method for calculating partition coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 1006-1010.
121. Schravendijk P, van der Vegt N, Delle Site L, Kremer K. Dual-scale modeling of benzene adsorption onto Ni[111] and Au[111] surfaces in explicit water. ChemPhysChem 2005, 6, 1866-1871.
122. Ghiringhelli LM, Delle Site L. Phenylalanine near inorganic surfaces: conformational statistics vs specific chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2634-2638.
123. Rimola A, Corno M, Zicovich-Wilson CM, Ugliengo P. Ab initio modeling of protein/biomaterial interactions: glycine adsorption at hydroxyapatite surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16181-16183.
124. Hong G, Heinz H, Naik RR, Farmer BL, Pachter R. Toward understanding amino acid adsorption at metallic interfaces: a density functional theory study. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 1, 388-392.
125. Hoefling M, Iori F, Corni S, Gottschalk KE. The conformations of amino acids on a Gold[111] surface. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 1763-1767.
126. Ludwig J, Vlachos DG. Ab initio molecular dynamics of hydrogen dissociation on metal surfaces using neural networks and novelty sampling. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127 154716.
127. Ramondo F, Bencivenni L, Caminiti R, Pieretti A, Gontrani L. Dimerisation of urea in water solution: a quantum mechanical investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 2206-2215.
128. Li JL, Car R, Tang C, Wingreen NS. Hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen-bond network for a methane pair in liquid water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2626-2630.
129. Matsuura A, Sato H, Houjou H, Saito S, Hayashi T, Sakurai M. Accurate evaluation of the absorption maxima of retinal proteins based on a hybrid QM/MM method. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1623-1630.
130. Berges J, Rickards G, Rauk A, Houee-Levin C. QM/MM study of electron addition on protein disulfide bonds. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 421, 63-67.
131. Riccardi D, Schaefer P, Cui Q. pKa calculations in solution and proteins with QM/MM free energy perturbation simulations: a quantitative test of QM/MM protocols. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 17715-17733.
132. Vila Verde A, Beltramo PJ, Maranas JK. Adsorption of homopolypeptides on gold investigated using atomistic molecular dynamics. Langmuir 2011, 27, 5918-5926.
133. Verde AV, Acres JM, Maranas JK. Investigating the specificity of peptide adsorption on gold using molecular dynamics simulations. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 2118-2128.
134. Yu J, Becker ML, Carri GA. The influence of amino acid sequence and functionality on the binding process of peptides onto gold surfaces. The influence of amino acid sequence and functionality on the binding process of peptides onto gold surfaces. Langmuir 2012, 28, 1408-1417.
135. Ghiringhelli LM, Hess B, van der Vegt NF, Delle Site L. Competing adsorption between hydrated peptides and water onto metal surfaces from electronic to conformational properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13460-13464.
136. Calzolari A, Cicero G, Cavazzoni C, Di Felice R, Catellani A, Corni S. Hydroxyl-rich sheet adhesion to the gold surface in water by first-principle simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4790-4795.
137. Feng J, Slocik JM, Sarikaya M, Naik RR, Farmer BL, Heinz H. Influence of the shape of nanostructured metal surfaces on adsorption of single peptide molecules in aqueous solution. Small 2012, 8, 1049-1059.
138. Brancolini G, Kokh DB, Calzolai L, Wade RC, Corni S. Docking of ubiquitin to gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9863-9878.
139. Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4 automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2785-2791.
140. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould LR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179-5197.
141. MacKerell ADJ, Brooks B, Brooks CLI, Nilsson L, Roux B, Won Y, Karplus M. CHARMM: the energy function and its parametrization with an overview of the program. In Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, P.v.R. Schleyer et al., editors (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1998), by A.D. MacKerell, Jr., B. Brooks, Wiley: New York, 1998, pp. 271-277.
142. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptide. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6474-6487.
143. Scott WRP, Hünenberger PH, Tironi IG, Mark AE, Billeter SR, Fennen J, Torda AE, Huber T, Krüger P, van Gunsteren WF. The GROMOS biomolecular simulation package. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 3596-3607.
144. Allinger NL, Chen K, Lii LH. An improved force field [MM4] for saturated hydrocarbons. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 642-668.
145. Hwang MJ, Stockfisch TP, Hagler AT. Derivation of class II force fields. 2. Derivation and characterization of a class II force field, CFF93, for the alkyl functional group and alkane molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2515-2525.
146. Lee S, Jeong HY, Lee H. Conformational properties of the bisphenol-A polycarbonate using the RMMC method. Comput. Theor. Polym. Sci. 2001, 11, 219-226.
147. McQuaid MJ, Sun H, Rigby D. Development and validation of COMPASS force field parameters for molecules with aliphatic azide chains. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 61-71.
148. Iori F, Di Felice R, Molinari E, Corni S. GolP: an atomistic force-field to describe the interaction of proteins with Au[111] surfaces in water. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 1465-1476.
149. Kokh DB, Corni S, Winn PJ, Hoefling M, Gottschalk KE, Kay E, Wade RC. ProMetCS: an atomistic force field for modeling protein-metal surface interactions in a continuum aqueous solvent. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 1753-1768.
150. Wright LB, Rodger PM, Corni S, Walsh TR. GolP-CHARMM: first-principles based force fields for the interaction of proteins with Au[111] and Au[100]. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 1616-1630.
151. Glattli A, Daura X, van Gunsteren WF. J. Chem. Phys. Derivation of an improved simple point charge model for liquid water: SPC/A and SPC/L. 2002, 116, 9811-9828.
152. Mark P, Nilsson L. Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 9954-9960.
153. Jorgensen WL, Jenson C. Temperature dependence of TIP3P, SPC, and TIP4P water from NPT Monte Carlo simulations: seeking temperatures of maximum density. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1179-1186.
154. Horn HW, Swope WC, Pitera JW. Characterization of the TIP4P-Ew water model: vapor pressure and boiling point. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 194504.
155. Mahoney MW, Jorgensen WL. Diffusion constant of the TIP5P model of liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 363-366.
156. Rick SW, Stuart SJ, Bader JS, Berne BJ. Fluctuating charge force fields for aqueous solutions. J. Mol. Liq. 1995, 65-66, 31-40.
157. Garemyr R, Elofsson A. Study of the electrostatics treatment in molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 1999, 37, 417-428.
158. Bertonati C, Honig B, Alexov E. Poisson-Boltzmann calculations of nonspecific salt effects on protein-protein binding free energies. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 1891-1899.
159. Bashford D, Case DA. Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2000, 51, 129-152.
160. Feig M, Brooks CL III. Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14, 217-224.
161. Morriss-Andrews A, Bellesia G, Shea JE. ß-sheet propensity controls the kinetic pathways and morphologies of seeded peptide aggregation. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 137, 145104.
162. Li R, Chen R, Chen P, Wen Y, Ke PC, Cho SS. Computational and experimental characterizations of silver nanoparticleapolipoprotein biocorona. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 13451-13456.
163. Ding F, Radic S, Chen R, Chen P, Geitner NK, Brownc JM, Ke PC. Direct observation of a single nanoparticle-ubiquitin corona formation. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9162-9169.
164. Nanda KK, Maisels A, Kruis FE, Fissan H, Stappert S. Higher surface energy of free nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 106102.
165. Roach P, Farrar D, Perry CC. Surface tailoring for controlled protein adsorption: effect of topography at the nanometer scale and chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3939-3945.
166. Mandal HS, Kraatz HB. Effect of the surface curvature on the secondary structure of peptides adsorbed on nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6356-6357.
167. Goy-López S, Juárez J, Alatorre-Meda M, Casals E, Puntes VF, Taboada P, Mosquera V. Physicochemical characteristics of protein-NP bioconjugates: the role of particle curvature and solution conditions on human serum albumin conformation and fibrillogenesis inhibition. Langmuir 2012, 28, 9113-9126.
168. Vertegel AA, Siegel RW, Dordick JS. Silica nanoparticle size influences the structure and enzymatic activity of adsorbed lysozyme. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6800-6807.
169. Shrivastava S, Nuffer JH, Siegel RW, Dordick JS. Positionspecific chemical modification and quantitative proteomics disclose protein orientation adsorbed on silica nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1583-1587.
170. Araci ZO, Runge AF, Doherty WJ III, Saavedra SS. Correlating molecular orientation distributions and electrochemical kinetics in subpopulations of an immobilized protein film. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1572-1573.
171. Deng ZJ, Liang M, Toth I, Monteiro MJ, Minchin RF. Molecular interaction of poly[acrylic acid] gold nanoparticles with human fibrinogen. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8962-8969.
172. Calzolai L, Franchini F, Gilliland D, Rossi F. Proteinnanoparticle interaction: identification of the ubiquitin-gold nanoparticle interaction site. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3101-3105.
173. Milani S, Bombelli FB, Pitek AS, Dawson KA, Rädler J. Reversible versus irreversible binding of transferrin to polystyrene nanoparticles: soft and hard corona. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2532-2541.