Erratum to What does standards-based educational reform mean for English language learner populations in primary and secondary schools? [TESOL Quarterly., 48(3), (2014), 433-453] DOI: 10.1002/tesq.183;What does standards-based educational reform mean for english language learner populations in primary and secondary schools?

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 433-453

  Kibler, Amanda ^a   Valdés, Guadalupe ^b   Walqui, Aída ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WestEd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906500892     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.207     Document Type: Erratum

References (94)

1. Abedi, J. (2008). Measuring students' level of English proficiency: Educational significance and assessment requirements. Educational Assessment, 13(2/3), 193-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10627190802394404
2. Abedi, J. & Gandara, P. (2006). Performance of English language learners as a subgroup in large-scale assessment: Interaction of research and policy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 26(5), 36-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00077.x
3. Abedi, J. & Hejri, F. (2004). Effectiveness and validity of NAEP accommodations for students with limited English proficiency. Applied Measurement in Education, 17(4), 371-392.
4. Alimi, M. (2011). Botswana English: Implications for English language teaching and assessment. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(4), 309-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2011.574700
5. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). The Australian Curriculum. Retrieved from www.australiancurriculum.edu.au.
6. Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., & Sato, E. (2007). Standards-to-standards linkage under Title III: Exploring common language demands in ELD and science standards. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 53-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957340709336730
7. Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2014). The role of language learning progressions in improved instruction and assessment of english language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 480-506. doi:10.1002/tesq.176
8. Bailey, A. L., & Huang, B. H. (2011). Do current English language development/proficiency standards reflect the English needed for success in school? Language Testing, 28(3), 343-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532211404187
9. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bunch, G. C., Walqui, A., & Pearson, P. D. (2014). Complex text and new common standards in the United States: Pedagogical implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 533-559. doi:10.1002/tesq.175
11. Bunton, D., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2002). Setting language benchmarks: Whose benchmark? Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12(1), 63-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/japc.12.1.05bun
12. Canagarajah, S. (2014). Theorizing a competence for translingual practice at the contact zone. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education (pp. 78-102). New York: Routledge.
13. Council of Chief State School Officers/CCSSO (2012). Framework for English language proficiency development standards corresponding to the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: CCSSO.
14. Cheng, L., Fox, J., & Zheng, Y. (2007). Student accounts of the Ontario secondary school literacy test: A case for validation. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 69-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.1.069
15. Creese, A. (2005). Teacher collaboration and talk in multilingual classrooms. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16. Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 103-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00986.x
17. Cumming, A. (2009). Language assessment in education: Tests, curricula, and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 90-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190509090084
18. Cumming, A., & Laurier, M. (Eds.). (2007). Language assessment. Special issue of the Canadian Modern Language Review, 64.
19. Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 37-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15434300701348359
20. Davison, C., & McKay, P. (2002). Counting and dis-counting learner group variation: English language and literacy standards in Australia. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12(1), 77-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/japc.12.1.06dav
21. Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 393-415. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00242.x
22. Evans, S. (2008). Classroom language use in Hong Kong's reformed English-medium stream. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29(6), 483-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/jmmd606.0
23. Flores, N., & Schissel, J. L. (2014). Dynamic bilingualism as the norm: Envisioning a heteroglossic approach to standards-based reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 454-479. doi:10.1002/tesq.182
24. Gamson, D. A., Lu, X., & Eckert, S. A. (2013). Challenging the research base of the Common Core State Standards: A historical reanalysis of text complexity. Educational Researcher, 42(7), 381-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13505684
25. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
26. García, O., & Flores, N. (2014). Multilingualism and Common Core State Standards in the United States. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 147-166). New York: Routledge.
27. Griffin, P., & McKay, P. (1992). Assessment and reporting in the ESL language and literacy in schools project. NLLIA ESL development: Language and literacy in schools project: Vol. 2. Canberra: National Languages and Literacy Institute of America.
28. Hammond, J. (2012). Hope and challenge in the Australian curriculum: Implications for EAL students and their teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 223-240.
29. Hammond, J. (2014). An Australian perspective on standards-based education, teacher knowledge, and students of English as an additional language. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 507-532. doi:10.1002/tesq.173
30. Hammond, J., & Derewianka, B. (1999). ESL and literacy education: Revisiting the relationship. Prospect, 14(2), 24-39.
31. Hawkins, M. (2014). Ontologies of place, creative meaning making and critical cosmopolitan education. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 90-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/curi.12036
32. Hohepa, M. K., & Rau, C. R. (2012). Ngā Whanaketanga: Minimising contradictions and maximising opportunities for teacher learning. Waikato Journal of Education, 17(2), 67-78.
33. Hornberger, N., & Vaish, V. (2009). Multilingual language policy and school linguistic practice: Globalization and English-language teaching in India, Singapore and South Africa. Compare, 39(3), 305-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057920802469663
34. Hu, G., & McKay, S. L. (2012). English language education in East Asia: some recent developments. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(4), 345-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2012.661434
35. Jones, J. M. (2008). Teachers' views and practice: The place of the mother tongue in the implementation of the Kenyan language-in-education policy. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 45-58.
36. Kamwendo, G. H. (2008). The bumpy road to mother tongue instruction in Malawi. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29(5), 353-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/jmmd547.0
37. Kibler, A. K. (2005). Implementation of educational policies for minority language pupils: A comparative case study analysis. Oxford: Symposium Books.
38. Koelsch, N., Chu, H., & Bañuelos, G. R. (2014). Language for learning: Supporting English language learners to meet the challenges of new standards. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 642-650. doi:10.1002/tesq.181
39. Krashen, S. (2014). The common core: A disaster for libraries, a disaster for language arts, a disaster for American education. Knowledge Quest, 42(3), 37-45.
40. Laguardia, A., & Goldman, P. (2007). School reform, standards testing and English language learners. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(2), 111-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603110600700679
41. Leung, C. (1993). National curriculum: ESL in primary education in England: A classroom study. Language and Education, 7(3), 163-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500789309541357
42. Leung, C. (1996). English as additional language within the national curriculum: A study of assessment practices. Prospect, 11(2), 58-68.
43. Leung, C. (2005). English as an additional language policy: Issues of inclusive access and language learning in the mainstream. Prospect, 20(1), 95-113.
44. Leung, C., & Lewkowicz, J. (2006). Expanding horizons and unresolved conundrums: Language testing and assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 211-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40264517
45. Leung, C., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2007). Teacher assessment as policy instrument: Contradictions and capacities. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 6-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15434300701348318
46. Lin, C.-K., & Zhang, J. (2013). Enhancing standard-based validity for ELL population: A perspective from correspondence between standards. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 399-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesq.93
47. Linquanti, R., & Cook, G. (2013). Toward a "common definition of English learner": Guidance for states and state assessment consortia in defining and addressing policy and technical issues and options. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers.
48. Llosa, L. (2011). Standards-based classroom assessments of English proficiency: A review of issues, current developments, and future directions for research. Language Testing, 28(3), 367-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532211404188
49. Llosa, L. (2012) Assessing English learners' progress: Longitudinal invariance of a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(4), 331-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2012.721422
50. Lo Bianco, J., & Wickert, R. (Eds.) (2001). Australian policy activism in language and literacy. Melbourne: Language Australia.
51. Peercy, M. M., & Martin-Beltrán, M. (2012). Envisioning collaboration: Including ESOL students and teachers in the mainstream classroom. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(7), 657-673.
52. Mahoney, K. (2008). Linguistic influences on differential item functioning for second language learners on the national assessment of educational progress. International Journal of Testing, 8(1), 14-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15305050701808615
53. Martiniello, M. (2009). Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment, 14(3/4), 160-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10627190903422906
54. May, S. (Ed.) (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. New York: Routledge.
55. McKay, P. (1995). Developing ESL proficiency descriptions for the school context: The NLLIA ESL Bandscales. In G. Brindley (Ed.), Language assessment in action (pp. 31-63). Sydney: NCELTR.
56. McKay, P. (1999). Standards-based reform through the literacy benchmarks: Comparisons between Australia and the United States. Prospect, 14(2), 52-65.
57. McKay, P. (2001). Why standards? Looking beyond the technicalities of standards-based assessment. Babel, 36(1), 16-21.
58. McKay, P. (2007). The standards movement and ELT for school-aged learners: Cross-national perspectives. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching, Part 1 (pp. 439-496). New York: Springer.
59. McKay, P., & Bond, T. (2002). Validation and calibration of language Australia ESL bandscales: Research proposal to Australia research council. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
60. McKay, P., & Brindley, G. (2007). Educational reform and ESL assessment in Australia: New roles and new tensions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 69-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15434300701348383
61. McKay, P., Coppari, P., Cumming, A., Graves, K., Lopriore, L., & Short, D. J. (2001a). Language standards: An international perspective, Part 1. TESOL Matters, 11(2), 1-4.
62. McKay, P., Coppari, P., Cumming, A., Graves, K., Lopriore, L., & Short, D. J. (2001b). Language standards: An international perspective, Part 2. TESOL Matters, 11(3), 11-15.
63. McKay, P., & Graves, K. (2006). Planning and teaching creatively within a required curriculum for school-age learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
64. Menken, K. (2010). NCLB and English language learners: Challenges and consequences. Theory Into Practice, 49(2), 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841003626619
65. Menken, K., & García, O. (Eds.) (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. New York: Routledge.
66. Menken, K., Hudson, T., & Leung, C. (2014). Symposium: Language assessment in standards-based education reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 586-614. doi:10.1002/tesq.180
67. Mislevy, R. J., & Durán, R. P. (2014). A Sociocognitive perspective on assessing EL students in the age of common core and next generation science standards. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 560-585. doi:10.1002/tesq.177
68. Mohan, B., Leung, C. & Davison, C. (Eds.) (2001). English as a second language in the mainstream. Harlow: Pearson.
69. Moore, H. (1996). Telling what is real: Competing views in assessing ESL development. Linguistics and Education, 8, 189-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(96)90014-5
70. Myers, M. (1994). Problems and issues facing the national standards project in English. Education and Urban Society, 26(2), 141-157.
71. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
72. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
73. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
74. Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A. D., (2011). Social inclusion and metrolingual practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(4), 413-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.573065
75. Palincsar, A. S., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2014). Focusing on language and meaning while learning with text. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 616-623. doi:10.1002/tesq.178
76. Pawan, F., & Ortloff, J. H. (2011). Sustaining collaboration: English-as-a-second-language, and content-area teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 463-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.016
77. Pompa, D., & Hakuta, K. (2012, January). Critical policy levers for effective implementation of common core state standards for ELLs. Paper presented at the Understanding Language Conference, Stanford, CA.
78. Ravitch, D. (2014, January). Common core: Past, present, future. Paper presented at Modern Language Association Annual Convention, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from: http://dianeravitch.net/2014/01/18/my-speech-about-common-core-to-mla/
79. Ricento, T. (Ed.) (2000). Ideology, politics, and language policies: Focus on English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
80. Rosenkrans, K., Sherris, A., & Chatry-Komarek, M. (2012). Education reform and the expansion of mother-tongue education in Ghana. International Review of Education, 58, 593-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11159-012-9312-6
81. Scott, C., & Erduran, S. (2004). Learning from international frameworks for assessment: EAL descriptors in Australia and the USA. Language Testing, 21(3), 409-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt290oa
82. Shohamy, E. (2011). Assessing multilingual competencies: Adopting construct valid assessment policies. Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 418-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01210.x
83. Sure, K. (2003). Establishing a national standard and English language curriculum change in Kenya. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(2), 197-211.
84. Taylor, S. K., & Snodden, K. (Eds.). (2013). Plurilingualism in TESOL: Promising Controversies. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 439-445. doi:10.1002/tesq.127
85. Teasdale, A., & Leung, C. (2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: A case of paradigm crossing? Language Testing, 17(2), 163-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/026553200672041197
86. Troia, G. A., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2013). The common core state standards and evidence-based educational practices: The case of writing. School Psychology Review, 42(3), 343-357.
87. Tsui, A. B. M. (Ed.). (2002). Maintaining and setting standards and language variation in the Asian Pacific region. Special Issue. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12(1).
88. Tsui, A. B. M., & Andrews, S. (2002). Setting standards and language variation: A dilemma for language education. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/japc.12.1.02tsu
89. Valdés, G., Kibler, A. K., & Walqui, A. (2014). Changes in the expertise of ESL professionals: Knowledge and action in an era of new standards. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
90. Verplaetse, L. S. (2014). Using big questions to apprentice students into language-rich classroom practices. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 632-641. doi:10.1002/tesq.179
91. Wesche, M. B., & Skehan, P. (2002). Communicative, task-based, and content-based language instruction. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 207-228). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
92. Wiley, T. G., & Hartung-Cole, E. (1998). Model standards for English language development: National trends and a local response. Education, 119(2), 205-221.
93. Wolf, M. K., & Leon, S. (2009). An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14(3/4), 139-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10627190903425883
94. Wong Fillmore, L. (2014). English language learners at the crossroads of educational reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 624-632. doi:10.1002/tesq.174