Standards-to-standards linkage under title III: Exploring common language demands in ELD and science standards

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 53-78

  Bailey, Alison L ^a,b   Butler, Frances A ^c   Sato, Edynn ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CRESST ^*  (United States)

^c Language Testing Consultant   (United States)

^d WestEd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248326425     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame2001_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bailey, A. L. (2007). Introduction: Teaching and assessing students learning English in school. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), Language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Bailey, A. L., & Butler, F. A. (2002/2003). An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 611). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
3. Reprinted with modification as Bailey, A. L., & Butler, F. A. (2007). A conceptual framework of academic English language for broad application to education. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), Language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., LaFramenta, C., & Ong, C. (2001/2004). Towards the characterization of academic language in upper elementary science classrooms. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 621). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
5. Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., Stevens, R., & Lord, C. (2007). Further specifying the language demands of school. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), Language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Bailey, A. L., Stevens, R., Butler, F. A., Huang, B., & Miyoshi, J. N. (2005). Using standards and empirical evidence to develop academic English proficiency test items in reading. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 669). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
7. Butler, F. A., Bailey, A. L., Stevens, R., Huang, B., & Lord, C. (2004). Academic English in fifth-grade mathematics, science, and social studies textbooks. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 642). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
8. California Department of Education. (1999). English-language development standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: Author. Retrieved April 21, 2004, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/pn/fd/documents/englangdev-stnd.pdf
9. California Department of Education. (2000). Grade five. In Science content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve (pp. 14-17). Sacramento: Author. Retrieved April 21, 2004, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/pn/fd/documents/sci-stnd.pdf
10. California Department of Education. (2003). Science framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: Author. Retrieved April 13, 2005, from http://www.cde .ca.gov/re/pn/fd/sci- frame-dwnld.asp
11. California Science Teachers Association. (1999). Making connections: A guide to implementing science standards. Sacramento, CA: Author.
12. CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2004). California English Language Development Test. Form D. Monterey, CA: Author.
13. Eckhout, T. J., Plake, B. S., Smith, D. L., & Larsen, A. (2007/this issue). Aligning a state's alternative standards to regular core content standards in reading and mathematics: A case study. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 79-99.
14. Fast, E. F., & Hebbler, S. (2004). A framework for examining validity in state accountability systems. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
15. Herman, J. L. (2004). The effects of testing on instruction. In S. Fuhrman & R. Elmore (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 141-166). New York: Teachers College.
16. Herman, J. L., Webb, N., & Zuniga, S. (2002, April). Alignment and college admissions: The match of expectations, assessments, and educator perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
17. Herman, J. L., Webb, N., & Zuniga, S. (2007/this issue). Measurement issues in the alignment of standards and assessments: A case study. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 101-126.
18. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001a, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 1 U.S.C. (2002).
19. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001b, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 3 U.S.C. (2002).
20. Plake, B. S., Buckendahl, C. W., & Impara, J. C. (2001, June). A comparison of publishers'and teachers' perspectives on the alignment of norm-referenced tests to Nebraska's language-arts content standards. Paper presented at the annual Large-Scale Assessment Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Snowbird, UT.
21. Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3-14.
22. Porter, A., Smithson, J., Blank, R., & Zeidner, T. (2007/this issue). Alignment as a teacher variable. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 27-51.
23. Rothman, R. (2004). Benchmarking and alignment of state standards and testing. In S. Fuhrman & R. Elmore (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 96-114). New York: Teachers College.
24. Scarcella, R., & Zimmerman, C. (1998). Academic words and gender: ESL student performance on a test of academic lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 27-49.
25. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). Language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Shannon, P. D. (n.d.). Lungs in the rib cage. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.lessonplans page.com/SciencePELungs- TheBreathingMachineRevisedVersion25.htm
27. Short, D. J. (1993). Integrating language and culture in middle school American history classes. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and the National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
28. Spanos, G., Rhodes, N. C., Dale, T. C., & Crandall, J. (1988). Linguistic features of mathematical problem solving: Insights and applications. In R. R. Cocking & J. P. Mestre (Eds.), Linguistic and cultural influences on mathematics (pp. 221-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Part II- Final non-regulatory guidance on the Title III state formula grants program: Standards, assessment and accountability (Draft February, 2003). Washington, DC: Office of English Language Acquisition, Author.
30. Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Council of Chief State School Officers and National Institute for Science Education. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
31. Webb, N. L. (1999). Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
32. Webb, N. L. (2007/this issue). Issues related to judging the alignment of curriculum standards and assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 7-25.
33. WestEd. (2004). Alignment study: Louisiana content standards and the Louisiana Alternate Assessment (LAA). San Francisco: Author.
34. Wixson, K. K., Fisk, M. C., Dutro, E., & McDaniel, J. (2002). The alignment of state Standards and assessments in elementary reading (CIERA Rep. No. 3-024). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan School of Education, Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.