Hira-mediated H3.3 incorporation is required for DNA replication and ribosomal RNA transcription in the mouse zygote

Developmental Cell

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 268-279

  Lin, Chih Jen ^a   Koh, FongMing ^a   Wong, Priscilla ^a   Conti, Marco ^a   Ramalho Santos, Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; RIBOSOME PROTEIN; RIBOSOME RNA;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPLICATION; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE ACTIVATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; OOCYTE MATURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA ANALYSIS; RNA ISOLATION; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; TRANSCRIPTION ELONGATION; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA REPLICATION; FERTILIZATION; HISTONE CHAPERONES; HISTONES; MALE; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; SPERMATOZOA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; ZYGOTE;

EID: 84905757826     PISSN: 15345807     EISSN: 18781551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adenot P.G., Mercier Y., Renard J.P., Thompson E.M. Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development 1997, 124:4615-4625.
2. Ahmad K., Henikoff S. The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol. Cell 2002, 9:1191-1200.
3. Akiyama T., Suzuki O., Matsuda J., Aoki F. Dynamic replacement of histone H3 variants reprograms epigenetic marks in early mouse embryos. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002279.
4. Bensaude O. Inhibiting eukaryotic transcription: which compound to choose? How to evaluate its activity?. Transcription 2011, 2:103-108.
5. Bouniol C., Nguyen E., Debey P. Endogenous transcription occurs at the 1-cell stage in the mouse embryo. Exp. Cell Res. 1995, 218:57-62.
6. Bouniol-Baly C., Hamraoui L., Guibert J., Beaujean N., Szöllösi M.S., Debey P. Differential transcriptional activity associated with chromatin configuration in fully grown mouse germinal vesicle oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 1999, 60:580-587.
7. Braude P., Pelham H., Flach G., Lobatto R. Post-transcriptional control in the early mouse embryo. Nature 1979, 282:102-105.
8. Bursać S., Brdovčak M.C., Pfannkuchen M., Orsolić I., Golomb L., Zhu Y., Katz C., Daftuar L., Grabušić K., Vukelić I., et al. Mutual protection of ribosomal proteins L5 and L11 from degradation is essential for p53 activation upon ribosomal biogenesis stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:20467-20472.
9. Bywater M.J., Poortinga G., Sanij E., Hein N., Peck A., Cullinane C., Wall M., Cluse L., Drygin D., Anderes K., et al. Inhibition of RNA polymerase I as a therapeutic strategy to promote cancer-specific activation of p53. Cancer Cell 2012, 22:51-65.
10. Clift D., Schuh M. Restarting life: fertilization and the transition from meiosis to mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14:549-562.
11. Cox S.G., Kim H., Garnett A.T., Medeiros D.M., An W., Crump J.G. An essential role of variant histone H3.3 for ectomesenchyme potential of the cranial neural crest. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002938.
12. de Vries W.N., Binns L.T., Fancher K.S., Dean J., Moore R., Kemler R., Knowles B.B. Expression of Cre recombinase in mouse oocytes: a means to study maternal effect genes. Genesis 2000, 26:110-112.
13. Dorn E.S., Cook J.G. Nucleosomes in the neighborhood: new roles for chromatin modifications in replication origin control. Epigenetics 2011, 6:552-559.
14. Drygin D., Lin A., Bliesath J., Ho C.B., O'Brien S.E., Proffitt C., Omori M., Haddach M., Schwaebe M.K., Siddiqui-Jain A., et al. Targeting RNA polymerase I with an oral small molecule CX-5461 inhibits ribosomal RNA synthesis and solid tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2011, 71:1418-1430.
15. Farley F.W., Soriano P., Steffen L.S., Dymecki S.M. Widespread recombinase expression using FLPeR (flipper) mice. Genesis 2000, 28:106-110.
16. Flaherty S.P., Payne D., Swann N.J., Matthews C.D. Assessment of fertilization failure and abnormal fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 1995, 7:197-210.
17. Gu T.P., Guo F., Yang H., Wu H.P., Xu G.F., Liu W., Xie Z.G., Shi L., He X., Jin S.G., et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 2011, 477:606-610.
18. Haddach M., Schwaebe M.K., Michaux J., Nagasawa J., O'Brien S.E., Whitten J.P., Pierre F., Kerdoncuff P., Darjania L., Stansfield R., et al. Discovery of CX-5461, the First Direct and Selective Inhibitor of RNA Polymerase I, for Cancer Therapeutics. ACS Med Chem Lett 2012, 3:602-606.
19. Hajkova P., Ancelin K., Waldmann T., Lacoste N., Lange U.C., Cesari F., Lee C., Almouzni G., Schneider R., Surani M.A. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature 2008, 452:877-881.
20. Hamatani T., Carter M.G., Sharov A.A., Ko M.S. Dynamics of global gene expression changes during mouse preimplantation development. Dev. Cell 2004, 6:117-131.
21. Hammoud S., Liu L., Carrell D.T. Protamine ratio and the level of histone retention in sperm selected from a density gradient preparation. Andrologia 2009, 41:88-94.
22. Haukenes G., Kalland K.H. Visualisation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis in eukaryotic cells in culture. Methods Cell Sci. 1998, 19:295-302.
23. Howlett S.K. The effect of inhibiting DNA replication in the one-cell mouse embryo. Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol. 1986, 195:499-505.
24. Johnson M.H. The molecular and cellular basis of preimplantation mouse development. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1981, 56:463-498.
25. Kent T., Lapik Y.R., Pestov D.G. The 5' external transcribed spacer in mouse ribosomal RNA contains two cleavage sites. RNA 2009, 15:14-20.
26. Kraushaar D.C., Jin W., Maunakea A., Abraham B., Ha M., Zhao K. Genome-wide incorporation dynamics reveal distinct categories of turnover for the histone variant H3.3. Genome Biol. 2013, 14:R121.
27. Kressler D., Hurt E., Bassler J. Driving ribosome assembly. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1803:673-683.
28. Laferté A., Favry E., Sentenac A., Riva M., Carles C., Chédin S. The transcriptional activity of RNA polymerase I is a key determinant for the level of all ribosome components. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:2030-2040.
29. Lam Y.W., Lamond A.I., Mann M., Andersen J.S. Analysis of nucleolar protein dynamics reveals the nuclear degradation of ribosomal proteins. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:749-760.
30. Latham K.E., Akutsu H., Patel B., Yanagimachi R. Comparison of gene expression during preimplantation development between diploid and haploid mouse embryos. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 67:386-392.
31. Lewis P.W., Müller M.M., Koletsky M.S., Cordero F., Lin S., Banaszynski L.A., Garcia B.A., Muir T.W., Becher O.J., Allis C.D. Inhibition of PRC2 activity by a gain-of-function H3 mutation found in pediatric glioblastoma. Science 2013, 340:857-861.
32. Lin C.J., Conti M., Ramalho-Santos M. Histone variant H3.3 maintains a decondensed chromatin state essential for mouse preimplantation development. Development 2013, 140:3624-3634.
33. Loppin B., Bonnefoy E., Anselme C., Laurençon A., Karr T.L., Couble P. The histone H3.3 chaperone HIRA is essential for chromatin assembly in the male pronucleus. Nature 2005, 437:1386-1390.
34. Maze I., Noh K.M., Soshnev A.A., Allis C.D. Every amino acid matters: essential contributions of histone variants to mammalian development and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15:259-271.
35. Modliński J.A. Haploid mouse embryos obtained by microsurgical removal of one pronucleus. J.Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1975, 33:897-905.
36. Nakamura T., Liu Y.J., Nakashima H., Umehara H., Inoue K., Matoba S., Tachibana M., Ogura A., Shinkai Y., Nakano T. PGC7 binds histone H3K9me2 to protect against conversion of 5mC to 5hmC in early embryos. Nature 2012, 486:415-419.
37. Nothias J.Y., Miranda M., DePamphilis M.L. Uncoupling of transcription and translation during zygotic gene activation in the mouse. EMBO J. 1996, 15:5715-5725.
38. Paynton B.V., Rempel R., Bachvarova R. Changes in state of adenylation and time course of degradation of maternal mRNAs during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 1988, 129:304-314.
39. Raj A., van den Bogaard P., Rifkin S.A., van Oudenaarden A., Tyagi S. Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:877-879.
40. Ray-Gallet D., Quivy J.P., Scamps C., Martini E.M.D., Lipinski M., Almouzni G. HIRA is critical for a nucleosome assembly pathway independent of DNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 2002, 9:1091-1100.
41. Schneiderman J.I., Orsi G.A., Hughes K.T., Loppin B., Ahmad K. Nucleosome-depleted chromatin gaps recruit assembly factors for the H3.3 histone variant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:19721-19726.
42. Schultz R.M. The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. Hum. Reprod. Update 2002, 8:323-331.
43. Schultz R.M., Wassarman P.M. Specific changes in the pattern of protein synthesis during meiotic maturation of mammalian oocytes invitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74:538-541.
44. Su Y.Q., Sugiura K., Woo Y., Wigglesworth K., Kamdar S., Affourtit J., Eppig J.J. Selective degradation of transcripts during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev. Biol. 2007, 302:104-117.
45. Szenker E., Lacoste N., Almouzni G. A developmental requirement for HIRA-dependent H3.3 deposition revealed at gastrulation in Xenopus. Cell Reports 2012, 1:730-740.
46. Sztein J.M., Farley J.S., Mobraaten L.E. Invitro fertilization with cryopreserved inbred mouse sperm. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 63:1774-1780.
47. Tagami H., Ray-Gallet D., Almouzni G., Nakatani Y. Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell 2004, 116:51-61.
48. Torres-Padilla M.E., Bannister A.J., Hurd P.J., Kouzarides T., Zernicka-Goetz M. Dynamic distribution of the replacement histone variant H3.3 in the mouse oocyte and preimplantation embryos. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2006, 50:455-461.
49. van der Heijden G.W., Dieker J.W., Derijck A.A., Muller S., Berden J.H., Braat D.D., van der Vlag J., de Boer P. Asymmetry in histone H3 variants and lysine methylation between paternal and maternal chromatin of the early mouse zygote. Mech. Dev. 2005, 122:1008-1022.
50. Wang Q.T., Piotrowska K., Ciemerych M.A., Milenkovic L., Scott M.P., Davis R.W., Zernicka-Goetz M. A genome-wide study of gene activity reveals developmental signaling pathways in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev. Cell 2004, 6:133-144.
51. Wassarman P.M., Letourneau G.E. RNA synthesis in fully-grown mouse oocytes. Nature 1976, 261:73-74.
52. White J.K., Gerdin A.K., Karp N.A., Ryder E., Buljan M., Bussell J.N., Salisbury J., Clare S., Ingham N.J., Podrini C., et al. Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell 2013, 154:452-464. Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project.
53. Woolford J.L., Baserga S.J. Ribosome biogenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2013, 195:643-681.
54. Yamanaka S., Blau H.M. Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature 2010, 465:704-712.
55. Yang H., Shi L., Wang B.A., Liang D., Zhong C., Liu W., Nie Y., Liu J., Zhao J., Gao X., et al. Generation of genetically modified mice by oocyte injection of androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells. Cell 2012, 149:605-617.
56. Zatsepina O., Baly C., Chebrout M., Debey P. The step-wise assembly of a functional nucleolus in preimplantation mouse embryos involves the cajal (coiled) body. Dev. Biol. 2003, 253:66-83.
57. Zeng F., Baldwin D.A., Schultz R.M. Transcript profiling during preimplantation mouse development. Dev. Biol. 2004, 272:483-496.
58. Zernicka-Goetz M., Morris S.A., Bruce A.W. Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:467-477.